From: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
To: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Cc: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] tests/functional/s390x: Add reverse debugging test for s390x
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2025 12:57:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d569827e7ef381842771738fae6c8f8bb30062ad.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f5a9796601bb90f754be75b9366149aafa2a9bb0.camel@linux.ibm.com>
On Mon, 2025-12-01 at 12:17 +0100, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> On Mon, 2025-12-01 at 10:36 +0000, Alex Bennée wrote:
> > Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> writes:
> >
> > > On Sun, 2025-11-30 at 20:03 +0100, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 2025-11-30 at 19:32 +0100, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> > > > > On Sun, 2025-11-30 at 16:47 +0000, Alex Bennée wrote:
> > > > > > Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> writes:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, 2025-11-28 at 18:25 +0100, Ilya Leoshkevich
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Fri, 2025-11-28 at 14:39 +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > > > > > > > > From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > We just have to make sure that we can set the
> > > > > > > > > endianness to
> > > > > > > > > big
> > > > > > > > > endian,
> > > > > > > > > then we can also run this test on s390x.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> > > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > > Marked as RFC since it depends on the fix for this
> > > > > > > > > bug
> > > > > > > > > (so
> > > > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > cannot
> > > > > > > > > be merged yet):
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/a0accce9-6042-4a7b-a7c7-218212818891@redhat.com
> > > > > > > > > /
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > tests/functional/reverse_debugging.py | 4
> > > > > > > > > +++-
> > > > > > > > > tests/functional/s390x/meson.build | 1 +
> > > > > > > > > tests/functional/s390x/test_reverse_debug.py | 21
> > > > > > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > > > > > 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > > > > > > create mode 100755
> > > > > > > > > tests/functional/s390x/test_reverse_debug.py
[...]
> > > I believe now I at least understand what the race is about:
> > >
> > > - cpu_post_load() fires the TOD timer immediately.
> > >
> > > - s390_tod_load() schedules work for firing the TOD timer.
> >
> > Is this a duplicate of work then? Could we just rely on one or the
> > other? If you drop the cpu_post_load() tweak then the vmstate load
> > helper should still ensure everything works right?
>
> Getting rid of it fixes the problem and makes sense anyway.
Hmm, on the other hand, this appears to have been done this way
deliberately:
commit 7c12f710bad60dc7e509da4e80c77e952ef0490c
Author: David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>
Date: Wed Jun 27 15:44:09 2018 +0200
s390x/tcg: rearm the CKC timer during migration
If the CPU data is migrated after the TOD clock, the CKC timer of a
CPU
is not rearmed. Let's rearm it when loading the CPU state.
Introduce tcg-stub.c just like kvm-stub.c for tcg specific stubs.
I guess introducing a dependency on migration order is indeed not great
for maintainability.
> > > - If rr loop sees work and then timer, we get one timer callback.
> > >
> > > - If rr loop sees timer and then work, we get two timer
> > > callbacks.
> >
> > If the timer is armed we should expect at least to execute a few
> > instructions before triggering the timer, unless it was armed ready
> > expired.
>
> Yes, it is armed expired.
>
>
> Isn't it a deficiency in record-replay that work and timers are not
> ordered relative to each other? Can't it bite us somewhere else?
[...]
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-01 11:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-28 13:39 [RFC PATCH] tests/functional/s390x: Add reverse debugging test for s390x Thomas Huth
2025-11-28 17:25 ` Ilya Leoshkevich
2025-11-29 21:33 ` Ilya Leoshkevich
2025-11-30 16:47 ` Alex Bennée
2025-11-30 18:32 ` Ilya Leoshkevich
2025-11-30 19:03 ` Ilya Leoshkevich
2025-11-30 22:59 ` Ilya Leoshkevich
2025-12-01 10:36 ` Alex Bennée
2025-12-01 11:17 ` Ilya Leoshkevich
2025-12-01 11:57 ` Ilya Leoshkevich [this message]
2025-12-01 12:43 ` Alex Bennée
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d569827e7ef381842771738fae6c8f8bb30062ad.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).