qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com>
To: Wang Xingang <wangxingang5@huawei.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: xieyingtai@huawei.com, peter.maydell@linaro.org,
	cenjiahui@huawei.com, mst@redhat.com, shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com,
	qemu-arm@nongnu.org, imammedo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC RESEND PATCH 2/4] hw/pci: Add iommu option for pci root bus
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 11:24:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d5cac8e3-2584-e904-0d1f-92058b45975e@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1614414831-39712-3-git-send-email-wangxingang5@huawei.com>

Hi Xingang,

On 2/27/21 9:33 AM, Wang Xingang wrote:
> From: Xingang Wang <wangxingang5@huawei.com>
> 
> This add iommu option for pci root bus, including primary bus
> and pxb root bus. Default option is set to true, and the option
> is valid only if the iommu option for machine is properly set.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xingang Wang <wangxingang5@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jiahui Cen <cenjiahui@huawei.com>
> ---
>  hw/arm/virt.c                       | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c |  6 ++++++
>  hw/pci/pci.c                        |  2 +-
>  include/hw/arm/virt.h               |  1 +
>  4 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/virt.c
> index 371147f3ae..0c9e549759 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/virt.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/virt.c
> @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@
>  #include "hw/virtio/virtio-iommu.h"
>  #include "hw/char/pl011.h"
>  #include "qemu/guest-random.h"
> +#include "include/hw/pci/pci_bus.h"
>  
>  #define DEFINE_VIRT_MACHINE_LATEST(major, minor, latest) \
>      static void virt_##major##_##minor##_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, \
> @@ -1232,6 +1233,10 @@ static void create_smmu(const VirtMachineState *vms,
>  
>      dev = qdev_new("arm-smmuv3");
>  
> +    if (vms->primary_bus_iommu) {
> +        bus->flags |= PCI_BUS_IOMMU;
> +    }
> +
>      object_property_set_link(OBJECT(dev), "primary-bus", OBJECT(bus),
>                               &error_abort);
>      sysbus_realize_and_unref(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(dev), &error_fatal);
> @@ -2305,6 +2310,20 @@ static void virt_set_iommu(Object *obj, const char *value, Error **errp)
>      }
>  }
>  
> +static bool virt_get_primary_bus_iommu(Object *obj, Error **errp)
> +{
> +    VirtMachineState *vms = VIRT_MACHINE(obj);
> +
> +    return vms->primary_bus_iommu;
> +}
> +
> +static void virt_set_primary_bus_iommu(Object *obj, bool value, Error **errp)
> +{
> +    VirtMachineState *vms = VIRT_MACHINE(obj);
> +
> +    vms->primary_bus_iommu = value;
> +}
> +
>  static CpuInstanceProperties
>  virt_cpu_index_to_props(MachineState *ms, unsigned cpu_index)
>  {
> @@ -2629,6 +2648,13 @@ static void virt_machine_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
>                                            "Set the IOMMU type. "
>                                            "Valid values are none and smmuv3");
>  
> +    object_class_property_add_bool(oc, "primary_bus_iommu",
> +                                  virt_get_primary_bus_iommu,
> +                                  virt_set_primary_bus_iommu);
> +    object_class_property_set_description(oc, "primary_bus_iommu",
> +                                          "Set on/off to enable/disable "
> +                                          "iommu for primary bus");
> +
>      object_class_property_add_bool(oc, "ras", virt_get_ras,
>                                     virt_set_ras);
>      object_class_property_set_description(oc, "ras",
> @@ -2696,6 +2722,9 @@ static void virt_instance_init(Object *obj)
>      /* Default disallows iommu instantiation */
>      vms->iommu = VIRT_IOMMU_NONE;
>  
> +    /* Iommu is enabled by default for primary bus */
> +    vms->primary_bus_iommu = true;
> +
>      /* Default disallows RAS instantiation */
>      vms->ras = false;
>  
> diff --git a/hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c b/hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c
> index aedded1064..0412656265 100644
> --- a/hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c
> +++ b/hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c
> @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ struct PXBDev {
>  
>      uint8_t bus_nr;
>      uint16_t numa_node;
> +    bool iommu;
>  };
>  
>  static PXBDev *convert_to_pxb(PCIDevice *dev)
> @@ -254,6 +255,10 @@ static void pxb_dev_realize_common(PCIDevice *dev, bool pcie, Error **errp)
>      bus->address_space_io = pci_get_bus(dev)->address_space_io;
>      bus->map_irq = pxb_map_irq_fn;
>  
> +    if (pxb->iommu) {
> +        bus->flags |= PCI_BUS_IOMMU;
> +    }
> +
>      PCI_HOST_BRIDGE(ds)->bus = bus;
>  
>      pxb_register_bus(dev, bus, &local_err);
> @@ -301,6 +306,7 @@ static Property pxb_dev_properties[] = {
>      /* Note: 0 is not a legal PXB bus number. */
>      DEFINE_PROP_UINT8("bus_nr", PXBDev, bus_nr, 0),
>      DEFINE_PROP_UINT16("numa_node", PXBDev, numa_node, NUMA_NODE_UNASSIGNED),
> +    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("iommu", PXBDev, iommu, true),
looks a bit odd to me that we have a property for the PXE-PCIe extra
root complex and not for the gpex device. Wouldn't it make sense to add
one for the GPEX too? In the positive you still could have a machine
option that would force the GPEX property value?
>      DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
>  };
>  
> diff --git a/hw/pci/pci.c b/hw/pci/pci.c
> index a9ebef8a35..dc969989c9 100644
> --- a/hw/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/hw/pci/pci.c
> @@ -2712,7 +2712,7 @@ AddressSpace *pci_device_iommu_address_space(PCIDevice *dev)
>  
>          iommu_bus = parent_bus;
>      }
> -    if (iommu_bus && iommu_bus->iommu_fn) {
> +    if (pci_bus_has_iommu(bus) && iommu_bus && iommu_bus->iommu_fn) {
>          return iommu_bus->iommu_fn(bus, iommu_bus->iommu_opaque, devfn);
>      }
>      return &address_space_memory;
> diff --git a/include/hw/arm/virt.h b/include/hw/arm/virt.h
> index ee9a93101e..babe829486 100644
> --- a/include/hw/arm/virt.h
> +++ b/include/hw/arm/virt.h
> @@ -147,6 +147,7 @@ struct VirtMachineState {
>      OnOffAuto acpi;
>      VirtGICType gic_version;
>      VirtIOMMUType iommu;
> +    bool primary_bus_iommu;
>      VirtMSIControllerType msi_controller;
>      uint16_t virtio_iommu_bdf;
>      struct arm_boot_info bootinfo;
> 
Thanks

Eric



  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-10 10:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-27  8:33 [RFC RESEND PATCH 0/4] hw/arm/virt-acpi-build: Introduce iommu option for pci root bus Wang Xingang
2021-02-27  8:33 ` [RFC RESEND PATCH 1/4] pci: Add PCI_BUS_IOMMU property Wang Xingang
2021-03-10 10:25   ` Auger Eric
2021-03-11 11:59     ` Wang Xingang
2021-02-27  8:33 ` [RFC RESEND PATCH 2/4] hw/pci: Add iommu option for pci root bus Wang Xingang
2021-03-10 10:24   ` Auger Eric [this message]
2021-03-11 12:24     ` Wang Xingang
2021-03-14 12:11       ` Auger Eric
2021-02-27  8:33 ` [RFC RESEND PATCH 3/4] hw/pci: Add pci_root_bus_max_bus Wang Xingang
2021-02-27  8:33 ` [RFC RESEND PATCH 4/4] hw/arm/virt-acpi-build: Add explicit idmap info in IORT table Wang Xingang
2021-03-09 10:44 ` [RFC RESEND PATCH 0/4] hw/arm/virt-acpi-build: Introduce iommu option for pci root bus Wang Xingang
2021-03-09 14:36 ` Auger Eric
2021-03-10  2:13   ` Wang Xingang
2021-03-10 10:18     ` Auger Eric
2021-03-11 11:57       ` Wang Xingang
2021-03-14 12:02         ` Auger Eric

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d5cac8e3-2584-e904-0d1f-92058b45975e@redhat.com \
    --to=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=cenjiahui@huawei.com \
    --cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com \
    --cc=wangxingang5@huawei.com \
    --cc=xieyingtai@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).