From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 252A5C433E0 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 11:14:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E278B206C3 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 11:14:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="P+4lBt4e" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E278B206C3 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:49416 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k55l7-000532-6N for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 07:14:29 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40002) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k55jt-0004L1-Cj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 07:13:13 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.120]:39542 helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k55jq-0008Gu-Tq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 07:13:12 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1597057988; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=mQaWuwsKY1CkB3RoWdMj8nWtPsmvygs0LzEasqRc1dM=; b=P+4lBt4eEnXDnRCrj1d28j1EL1xwwAXd/r9+nipxS38B7HKHI/9c0HSBDE9gP0rNlY08h5 JEaZM3UjmFCpsYP7H29U3cjmL4OscejP3yrfw0n45S6tLbbo75yUCyEXjKb0XOC6h0WKhh +Ym3cda/kWX31Npr+mUBL3JmDpa00no= Received: from mail-wr1-f71.google.com (mail-wr1-f71.google.com [209.85.221.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-514-mm46pGTAMN2I0UaPNrlzWQ-1; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 07:13:07 -0400 X-MC-Unique: mm46pGTAMN2I0UaPNrlzWQ-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f71.google.com with SMTP id b8so4099737wrr.2 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 04:13:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=mQaWuwsKY1CkB3RoWdMj8nWtPsmvygs0LzEasqRc1dM=; b=QtdDE32vOTHru/hGItd3GAjActji/Mk2bMYupAefdW4QEgSN75dbbkGjAjvGkHMqs8 LK5HGlDABSTrB3hrH/XsUfVsFGwNiYOkqmw0I4nIgEnFdnj5lk1WZskhQvAcyvRtYSLy 56F0TCzmQdHg48O6wOjfqjeRxTYeUSJf4YZIbSCpUdZ7yB7iLnJak8dKTasedSUSREd3 uzxFqRShCUc5Ho5sPLpjZynnOw+wQ78PBq9wXmQA7FsDedEZWh+AjP2Rx1qaztkvNNUI YlHFynslJeI3GxBHFxvmZlyCom9wAKHbxarv0lcZjOHIZWpK0ScotfCxyJ04j1zhYMT1 BcNQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532gKXpalpq3EjMTBTG8qsi9gJfZbmSQF2yb3BrtbT7j+SSLou1w mglyyANbFKX+ef1aVJJaeeWD4bvPzgqUTRbrCwLvYHqxYiNipv5StpgU4CDK2tTvFE4dsr4zL/U amzKvUB3WQdE+alw= X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c20a:: with SMTP id x10mr26744249wmi.177.1597057986115; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 04:13:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwERIwF5qhuWeBWmiY43T3PQLMru1sZFOI+cR4jLjXRJPXY7EyWV4pVYbFqQlzxsbeRUr09tA== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c20a:: with SMTP id x10mr26744230wmi.177.1597057985868; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 04:13:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:b07:6468:f312:5d6c:f50:4462:5103? ([2001:b07:6468:f312:5d6c:f50:4462:5103]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s131sm21427151wme.17.2020.08.10.04.13.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 10 Aug 2020 04:13:05 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] acceptance: update asset hashes for the Bionic aarch64 installer To: =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= , qemu-devel@nongnu.org References: <20200809223741.56570-1-pbonzini@redhat.com> <13b3586c-4d0e-76bc-4716-b6ee88e9686a@redhat.com> <06ed9cc7-2204-395c-2395-d5c750c75635@redhat.com> <606d1faa-1920-de51-9197-95b79466331d@redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 13:13:04 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <606d1faa-1920-de51-9197-95b79466331d@redhat.com> Content-Language: en-US Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=pbonzini@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=205.139.110.120; envelope-from=pbonzini@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/08/10 05:06:51 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -30 X-Spam_score: -3.1 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Maydell , alex.bennee@linaro.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 10/08/20 11:35, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >> That seems overkill but yeah the tests should have used >> 20101020ubuntu543.15 instead of current. I think this should get into rc4. > As our CI is not yet gating, I don't think this justifies delaying the > release (except if there is a critical bugfix on the list). It is not gating, but it means that acceptance test for 5.1.0 will be broken forever for everyone that attempts to run them. Paolo > Maybe it is acceptable to simply merge the CI test fixes before the > release tag, as no code/binary is affected... >