From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52463) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cHnqu-0006EW-1i for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 03:26:52 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cHnqq-0002zl-Tr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 03:26:52 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59178) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cHnqq-0002xx-Nm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 03:26:48 -0500 References: <20161214142518.10504-1-stefanha@redhat.com> <20161215063226-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20161215075028.GD26169@stefanha-x1.localdomain> <1481793479.21413.6.camel@redhat.com> <20161215170523-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <1481819150.21413.21.camel@redhat.com> <20161215202505-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20161215211838-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> From: Thomas Huth Message-ID: Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 09:26:43 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161215211838-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] regression in 2.8: unable to exit screen grab in SDL mode List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Gerd Hoffmann Cc: Kevin Wolf , Stefan Hajnoczi , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi , Cole Robinson On 15.12.2016 20:19, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 09:15:27PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 05:25:50PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>>>>>> The problem always reproduces for me: >>>>>>> - start qemu with -sdl >>>>>>> - wait for guest to boot >>>>>>> - click anywhere within guest screen >>>>>>> - message "press ctrl+alt to exit capture" appears on screen, >>>>>>> but pressing that immediately restarts capture again >>> >>> [ 2.6 good, 2.7, 2.8 bad ] >>> >>>> I'd say SDL is mostly useless with this bug. >>>> >>>> Do we fix this or disable SDL altogether? >>> >>> Well, it can't be *that* bad, otherwise it would not went unnoticed for >>> a whole release cycle. >> >> That's what I'm saying, maybe no one uses SDL anymore. It's maybe not as common as the GTK interface, but as far as I know people still use the SDL interface. For example here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/922076 ... so I would recommend to keep the SDL code in QEMU. Thomas