From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
"Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: "Kevin Wolf" <kwolf@redhat.com>,
"xiaoqiang zhao" <zxq_yx_007@163.com>,
"Marc-André Lureau" <marcandre.lureau@gmail.com>,
QEMU <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, "Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] sockets: Attempt to drain the abstract socket swamp
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2020 09:57:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d76e90fb-3646-66ae-0efc-dfcbc187896e@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zh40no5a.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>
On 02/11/20 09:44, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>> Reverting the feature requires rough consensus and a patch.
>>>
>>> I can provide a patch, but let's give everybody a chance to object
>>> first.
> Daniel, do you object, yes or no?
I think we should keep the patch, especially since you have cleaned up
everything already. The interaction with namespaces is interesting.
Abstract sockets also do not have the usual issue with needing to unlink
the socket before bind(), because they are cleaned up automatically when
their last file descriptor is closed, including on SIGKILL.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-02 8:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-29 13:38 [PATCH 00/11] sockets: Attempt to drain the abstract socket swamp Markus Armbruster
2020-10-29 13:38 ` [PATCH 01/11] test-util-sockets: Plug file descriptor leak Markus Armbruster
2020-10-29 17:59 ` Eric Blake
2020-10-29 13:38 ` [PATCH 02/11] test-util-sockets: Correct to set has_abstract, has_tight Markus Armbruster
2020-10-29 18:36 ` Eric Blake
2020-10-29 13:38 ` [PATCH 03/11] test-util-sockets: Clean up SocketAddress construction Markus Armbruster
2020-10-29 18:43 ` Eric Blake
2020-10-30 9:36 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-10-30 14:06 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-10-29 13:38 ` [PATCH 04/11] test-util-sockets: Factor out test_socket_unix_abstract_one() Markus Armbruster
2020-10-29 18:52 ` Eric Blake
2020-10-29 13:38 ` [PATCH 05/11] test-util-sockets: Synchronize properly, don't sleep(1) Markus Armbruster
2020-10-29 18:54 ` Eric Blake
2020-10-30 6:40 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-10-29 13:38 ` [PATCH 06/11] test-util-sockets: Test the complete abstract socket matrix Markus Armbruster
2020-10-29 19:19 ` Eric Blake
2020-10-30 9:33 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-10-30 14:14 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-10-29 13:38 ` [PATCH 07/11] sockets: Fix default of UnixSocketAddress member @tight Markus Armbruster
2020-10-29 17:39 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-10-29 18:05 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-10-30 6:58 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-10-29 19:34 ` Eric Blake
2020-10-30 6:54 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-10-29 13:38 ` [PATCH 08/11] sockets: Fix socket_sockaddr_to_address_unix() for abstract sockets Markus Armbruster
2020-10-29 17:47 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-10-30 8:56 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-10-29 19:38 ` Eric Blake
2020-10-30 9:04 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-10-30 12:39 ` Eric Blake
2020-10-29 13:38 ` [PATCH 09/11] char-socket: Fix qemu_chr_socket_address() " Markus Armbruster
2020-10-29 19:41 ` Eric Blake
2020-10-30 9:09 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-10-29 13:38 ` [PATCH 10/11] sockets: Bypass "replace empty @path" for abstract unix sockets Markus Armbruster
2020-10-29 19:42 ` Eric Blake
2020-10-29 13:38 ` [PATCH 11/11] sockets: Make abstract UnixSocketAddress depend on CONFIG_LINUX Markus Armbruster
2020-10-29 19:54 ` Eric Blake
2020-10-30 9:25 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-10-29 13:53 ` [PATCH 00/11] sockets: Attempt to drain the abstract socket swamp Marc-André Lureau
2020-10-30 10:11 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-10-30 10:20 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-11-02 8:44 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-11-02 8:57 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2020-11-02 9:18 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-11-02 9:59 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-11-02 10:02 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-11-02 11:58 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-10-29 18:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-10-30 10:12 ` Markus Armbruster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d76e90fb-3646-66ae-0efc-dfcbc187896e@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=marcandre.lureau@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=zxq_yx_007@163.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).