qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Cédric Le Goater" <clg@redhat.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Vinayak Kale <vkale@nvidia.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com,
	avihaih@nvidia.com, acurrid@nvidia.com, cjia@nvidia.com,
	zhiw@nvidia.com, targupta@nvidia.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] vfio/pci: migration: Skip config space check for Vendor Specific Information in VSC during restore/load
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 14:40:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d8cc4405-fe9c-4b47-be76-708a72d4b1a1@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <10a42156-067e-4dc1-8467-b840595b38fa@redhat.com>

Hello Vinayak,

On 3/28/24 10:30, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 3/27/24 21:52, Alex Williamson wrote:
>> On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 16:11:37 -0400
>> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 11:39:15AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 12:12:10 +0530
>>>> Vinayak Kale <vkale@nvidia.com> wrote:
>>>>> In case of migration, during restore operation, qemu checks config space of the
>>>>> pci device with the config space in the migration stream captured during save
>>>>> operation. In case of config space data mismatch, restore operation is failed.
>>>>>
>>>>> config space check is done in function get_pci_config_device(). By default VSC
>>>>> (vendor-specific-capability) in config space is checked.
>>>>>
>>>>> Due to qemu's config space check for VSC, live migration is broken across NVIDIA
>>>>> vGPU devices in situation where source and destination host driver is different.
>>>>> In this situation, Vendor Specific Information in VSC varies on the destination
>>>>> to ensure vGPU feature capabilities exposed to the guest driver are compatible
>>>>> with destination host.
>>>>>
>>>>> If a vfio-pci device is migration capable and vfio-pci vendor driver is OK with
>>>>> volatile Vendor Specific Info in VSC then qemu should exempt config space check
>>>>> for Vendor Specific Info. It is vendor driver's responsibility to ensure that
>>>>> VSC is consistent across migration. Here consistency could mean that VSC format
>>>>> should be same on source and destination, however actual Vendor Specific Info
>>>>> may not be byte-to-byte identical.
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch skips the check for Vendor Specific Information in VSC for VFIO-PCI
>>>>> device by clearing pdev->cmask[] offsets. Config space check is still enforced
>>>>> for 3 byte VSC header. If cmask[] is not set for an offset, then qemu skips
>>>>> config space check for that offset.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Vinayak Kale <vkale@nvidia.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Version History
>>>>> v2->v3:
>>>>>      - Config space check skipped only for Vendor Specific Info in VSC, check is
>>>>>        still enforced for 3 byte VSC header.
>>>>>      - Updated commit description with live migration failure scenario.
>>>>> v1->v2:
>>>>>      - Limited scope of change to vfio-pci devices instead of all pci devices.
>>>>>
>>>>>   hw/vfio/pci.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>   1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Acked-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> A very reasonable way to do it.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
>>>
>>> Merge through the VFIO tree I presume?
>>
>> Yep, Cédric said he´d grab it for 9.1.  Thanks,

Could you please resend an update of this change adding a machine
compatibility property for migration ?

Thanks,

C.



  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-29 12:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-22  6:42 [PATCH v3] vfio/pci: migration: Skip config space check for Vendor Specific Information in VSC during restore/load Vinayak Kale
2024-03-27 17:39 ` Alex Williamson
2024-03-27 20:11   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-03-27 20:52     ` Alex Williamson
2024-03-28  9:30       ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-04-29 12:40         ` Cédric Le Goater [this message]
2024-04-30 10:10           ` Vinayak Kale

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d8cc4405-fe9c-4b47-be76-708a72d4b1a1@redhat.com \
    --to=clg@redhat.com \
    --cc=acurrid@nvidia.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=avihaih@nvidia.com \
    --cc=cjia@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=targupta@nvidia.com \
    --cc=vkale@nvidia.com \
    --cc=zhiw@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).