From: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: pasic@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, thuth@redhat.com,
cohuck@redhat.com, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] virtio-ccw: move vhost_ccw_scsi to a separate file
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 16:09:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d8d2bbd5021076bdba444d31a6da74f507baede3.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220328143019.682245-3-pbonzini@redhat.com>
On Mon, 2022-03-28 at 16:30 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Remove unecessary use of #ifdef CONFIG_VHOST_SCSI, instead just use a
> separate file and a separate rule in meson.build.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> ---
> hw/s390x/meson.build | 1 +
> hw/s390x/vhost-scsi-ccw.c | 64
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> hw/s390x/virtio-ccw-scsi.c | 47 ----------------------------
> 3 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 hw/s390x/vhost-scsi-ccw.c
>
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/meson.build b/hw/s390x/meson.build
> index 28484256ec..feefe0717e 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/meson.build
> +++ b/hw/s390x/meson.build
> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ virtio_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_VIRTIO_SERIAL',
> if_true: files('virtio-ccw-serial.c'
> if have_virtfs
> virtio_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_VIRTIO_9P', if_true: files('virtio-
> ccw-9p.c'))
> endif
> +virtio_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_VHOST_SCSI', if_true: files('vhost-scsi-
> ccw.c'))
> virtio_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_VHOST_VSOCK', if_true: files('vhost-
> vsock-ccw.c'))
> virtio_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_VHOST_USER_FS', if_true: files('vhost-
> user-fs-ccw.c'))
> s390x_ss.add_all(when: 'CONFIG_VIRTIO_CCW', if_true: virtio_ss)
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/vhost-scsi-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/vhost-scsi-ccw.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..b68ddddd1c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/hw/s390x/vhost-scsi-ccw.c
Entries exist in the "virtio-ccw" section of MAINTAINERS for the two
vhost files that live in hw/s390x/ today (also covered by the wildcard
entry for vhost). I'd guess this means we should add another to cover
the new file?
Besides that, looks fine.
Reviewed-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
Thanks,
Eric
> @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
> +/*
> + * vhost ccw scsi implementation
> + *
> + * Copyright 2012, 2015 IBM Corp.
> + * Author(s): Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
> + *
> + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2
> or (at
> + * your option) any later version. See the COPYING file in the top-
> level
> + * directory.
> + */
> +
> +#include "qemu/osdep.h"
> +#include "hw/qdev-properties.h"
> +#include "hw/virtio/virtio.h"
> +#include "qapi/error.h"
> +#include "qemu/module.h"
> +#include "virtio-ccw.h"
> +
> +static void vhost_ccw_scsi_realize(VirtioCcwDevice *ccw_dev, Error
> **errp)
> +{
> + VHostSCSICcw *dev = VHOST_SCSI_CCW(ccw_dev);
> + DeviceState *vdev = DEVICE(&dev->vdev);
> +
> + qdev_realize(vdev, BUS(&ccw_dev->bus), errp);
> +}
> +
> +static void vhost_ccw_scsi_instance_init(Object *obj)
> +{
> + VHostSCSICcw *dev = VHOST_SCSI_CCW(obj);
> +
> + virtio_instance_init_common(obj, &dev->vdev, sizeof(dev->vdev),
> + TYPE_VHOST_SCSI);
> +}
> +
> +static Property vhost_ccw_scsi_properties[] = {
> + DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("max_revision", VirtioCcwDevice, max_rev,
> + VIRTIO_CCW_MAX_REV),
> + DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
> +};
> +
> +static void vhost_ccw_scsi_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void
> *data)
> +{
> + DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
> + VirtIOCCWDeviceClass *k = VIRTIO_CCW_DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
> +
> + k->realize = vhost_ccw_scsi_realize;
> + device_class_set_props(dc, vhost_ccw_scsi_properties);
> + set_bit(DEVICE_CATEGORY_STORAGE, dc->categories);
> +}
> +
> +static const TypeInfo vhost_ccw_scsi = {
> + .name = TYPE_VHOST_SCSI_CCW,
> + .parent = TYPE_VIRTIO_CCW_DEVICE,
> + .instance_size = sizeof(VHostSCSICcw),
> + .instance_init = vhost_ccw_scsi_instance_init,
> + .class_init = vhost_ccw_scsi_class_init,
> +};
> +
> +static void virtio_ccw_scsi_register(void)
> +{
> + type_register_static(&vhost_ccw_scsi);
> +}
> +
> +type_init(virtio_ccw_scsi_register)
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw-scsi.c b/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw-scsi.c
> index 6e4beef700..fa706eb550 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw-scsi.c
> +++ b/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw-scsi.c
> @@ -70,56 +70,9 @@ static const TypeInfo virtio_ccw_scsi = {
> .class_init = virtio_ccw_scsi_class_init,
> };
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_VHOST_SCSI
> -
> -static void vhost_ccw_scsi_realize(VirtioCcwDevice *ccw_dev, Error
> **errp)
> -{
> - VHostSCSICcw *dev = VHOST_SCSI_CCW(ccw_dev);
> - DeviceState *vdev = DEVICE(&dev->vdev);
> -
> - qdev_realize(vdev, BUS(&ccw_dev->bus), errp);
> -}
> -
> -static void vhost_ccw_scsi_instance_init(Object *obj)
> -{
> - VHostSCSICcw *dev = VHOST_SCSI_CCW(obj);
> -
> - virtio_instance_init_common(obj, &dev->vdev, sizeof(dev->vdev),
> - TYPE_VHOST_SCSI);
> -}
> -
> -static Property vhost_ccw_scsi_properties[] = {
> - DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("max_revision", VirtioCcwDevice, max_rev,
> - VIRTIO_CCW_MAX_REV),
> - DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
> -};
> -
> -static void vhost_ccw_scsi_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void
> *data)
> -{
> - DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
> - VirtIOCCWDeviceClass *k = VIRTIO_CCW_DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
> -
> - k->realize = vhost_ccw_scsi_realize;
> - device_class_set_props(dc, vhost_ccw_scsi_properties);
> - set_bit(DEVICE_CATEGORY_STORAGE, dc->categories);
> -}
> -
> -static const TypeInfo vhost_ccw_scsi = {
> - .name = TYPE_VHOST_SCSI_CCW,
> - .parent = TYPE_VIRTIO_CCW_DEVICE,
> - .instance_size = sizeof(VHostSCSICcw),
> - .instance_init = vhost_ccw_scsi_instance_init,
> - .class_init = vhost_ccw_scsi_class_init,
> -};
> -
> -#endif
> -
> static void virtio_ccw_scsi_register(void)
> {
> type_register_static(&virtio_ccw_scsi);
> -#ifdef CONFIG_VHOST_SCSI
> - type_register_static(&vhost_ccw_scsi);
> -#endif
> }
>
> type_init(virtio_ccw_scsi_register)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-29 20:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-28 14:30 [PATCH 0/4] virtio-ccw: remove device declarations from virtio-ccw.h Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-28 14:30 ` [PATCH 1/4] s390x: follow qdev tree to detect SCSI device on a CCW bus Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-29 12:45 ` Thomas Huth
2022-03-31 0:21 ` Halil Pasic
2022-03-28 14:30 ` [PATCH 2/4] virtio-ccw: move vhost_ccw_scsi to a separate file Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-29 13:34 ` Thomas Huth
2022-03-29 20:09 ` Eric Farman [this message]
2022-03-31 11:46 ` Halil Pasic
2022-04-04 14:43 ` Cornelia Huck
2022-03-28 14:30 ` [PATCH 3/4] virtio-ccw: move device type declarations to .c files Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-30 7:11 ` Thomas Huth
2022-03-31 12:14 ` Halil Pasic
2022-03-28 14:30 ` [PATCH 4/4] virtio-ccw: do not include headers for all virtio devices Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-30 7:12 ` Thomas Huth
2022-03-31 13:50 ` Halil Pasic
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d8d2bbd5021076bdba444d31a6da74f507baede3.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).