From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51909) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ff53a-0002NG-EL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 11:04:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ff53X-00039g-Av for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 11:04:58 -0400 Received: from mail-pl0-x22a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c01::22a]:39435) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ff53X-00039H-2h for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 11:04:55 -0400 Received: by mail-pl0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id p23-v6so4119724plo.6 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 08:04:54 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Richard Henderson References: <5368d20b-2b39-2fee-8851-f749f97071f8@vivier.eu> From: Richard Henderson Message-ID: Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 08:04:50 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] tcg_register_jit_int() interface problem List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Aleksandar Markovic , Laurent Vivier , Peter Maydell Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , Petar Jovanovic , Riku Voipio , Stefan Markovic On 07/16/2018 04:36 AM, Aleksandar Markovic wrote: > The problem is, this means there will be separate executables for QEMU for MIPS > and QEMU for nanoMIPS. Would that be acceptable from overall QEMU design point > of view? Peter, Richard? I really don't imagine how you would *not* have different executables. NanoMIPS and MIPS III cannot be run on the same machine, surely? r~