From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>, He Chen <he.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] x86: Allow to set NUMA distance for different NUMA nodes
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2017 10:09:22 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d93b2ebb-c5a3-a774-30fd-2d92c7703549@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170303135704.GX2778@thinpad.lan.raisama.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2547 bytes --]
On 03/03/2017 07:57 AM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>> With this patch, when a user wants to create a guest that contains
>> several vNUMA nodes and also wants to set distance among those nodes,
>> the QEMU command would like:
>>
>> ```
>> -object memory-backend-ram,size=1G,prealloc=yes,host-nodes=0,policy=bind,id=node0 \
>> -numa node,nodeid=0,cpus=0,memdev=node0,distance=10,distance=21,distance=31,distance=41 \
>
> It would be nice to have a more intuitive syntax to represent
> ordered lists in QemuOpts. But this is what we have today.
>
Markus has the discussion on representing arrays via the command line;
particularly since this array is very tightly coupled to the order in
which values are presented, it may be worth having:
-numa
node,nodeid=0,cpus=0,memdev=nod0,distance.0=10,distance.1=21,distance.2=31,distance.3=41
with the explicit distance.0= suffixes to distance making it more
obvious that we are dealing with an array.
> I think the proposal makes sense. I would like the semantics of the new option
> to be documented at qapi-schema.json and qemu-options.hx.
>
> I would call the new NumaNodeOptions field "distances", as it is
> a list of distances.
Indeed, Markus is trying (with his work on -blockdev for 2.9) to get the
command line to a point where it is identical to the QMP code, by
reusing qapi-schema.json, so we should very much keep that in mind with
whatever we add to -numa in 2.10.
> but in the future we could support something like:
>
> -numa node,nodeid=0,cpus=0,memdev=node0 \
> -numa node,nodeid=1,cpus=1,memdev=node1 \
> -numa node,nodeid=2,cpus=2,memdev=node2 \
> -numa node,nodeid=3,cpus=3,memdev=node3 \
> -numa distances,distances[0][0]=10,distances[0][1]=21,distances[0][2]=31,distances[0][3]=41,\
> distances[1][0]=21,distances[1][1]=10,distances[1][2]=21,distances[1][3]=31,\
> distances[2][0]=31,distances[2][1]=21,distances[2][2]=10,distances[2][3]=21,\
> distances[3][0]=41,distances[3][1]=31,distances[3][2]=21,distances[3][3]=10
Except that [] requires special shell quoting, so the proposal would be
more like:
-numa distances.0.0=10,distances.0.1=21
Right now, QMP doesn't support 2-D arrays (although this may be a good
reason to introduce support), so that's also something to think about
(not insurmountable, but makes the task more complex).
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 604 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-03 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-03 5:01 [Qemu-devel] [RFC] x86: Allow to set NUMA distance for different NUMA nodes He Chen
2017-03-03 5:19 ` no-reply
2017-03-03 13:57 ` Eduardo Habkost
2017-03-03 16:09 ` Eric Blake [this message]
2017-03-03 16:26 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2017-03-03 16:47 ` Eduardo Habkost
2017-03-03 16:52 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2017-03-03 17:10 ` Eduardo Habkost
2017-03-03 17:12 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2017-03-07 1:50 ` He Chen
2017-03-07 7:37 ` Markus Armbruster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d93b2ebb-c5a3-a774-30fd-2d92c7703549@redhat.com \
--to=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=he.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).