From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1N3EDP-0007rS-3m
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:29:51 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1N3EDK-0007lq-Fn
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:29:50 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=51259 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N3EDJ-0007lk-Vk
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:29:46 -0400
Received: from mail-bw0-f212.google.com ([209.85.218.212]:50618)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <dustin.kirkland@gmail.com>) id 1N3EDJ-00064N-RN
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:29:46 -0400
Received: by bwz4 with SMTP id 4so1675991bwz.2
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:29:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: dustin.kirkland@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <d9c105ea0910281222u76a61a2by3cc924e85d40a865@mail.gmail.com>
References: <d9c105ea0910281222u76a61a2by3cc924e85d40a865@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:29:44 -0500
Message-ID: <d9c105ea0910281229s209d383bjf797e40f69745b51@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dustin Kirkland <kirkland@canonical.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu-kvm-0.11 regression,
	crashes on older guests with virtio network
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>

On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Dustin Kirkland <kirkland@canonical.com> w=
rote:
> I have not reproduced the problem:
> =A0a) by saturating the guest's outgoing network
> =A0b) with newer guests ( >=3D 2.6.27 )
> =A0c) on kvm-84 on the host

 d) or by using e1000, or rtl8139 NIC models.

:-Dustin