From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A51B5C433DB for ; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 16:13:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F096A64DC4 for ; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 16:13:34 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org F096A64DC4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:33868 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6FLx-0007Wa-TU for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 11:13:33 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35918) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6FKw-00072N-H9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 11:12:30 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([63.128.21.124]:30414) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6FKt-0007mV-P3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 11:12:29 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1612109545; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/j+Zjll2kbbDasMODKwZPcNmLazi6q4NpcAEHcCfmtQ=; b=Xud0Pp5yHNV6/8Bf5+fTA1wwcpRqZVrRn6/yOOlz1pi2riCHljyCqwOLNRyMHWoIF84Qkh wf63AmfFf1QW/sPjRQRjfsEDEWmWK+trZIu4sCUMcs3bmOBTGcnbQKAtfTFHHYCdlMhQ8A RvcDH1gRy5MmBXBGU7LBFisRN0d2RlY= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-218-s84SLo8AODO0VSeRKqRARA-1; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 11:12:23 -0500 X-MC-Unique: s84SLo8AODO0VSeRKqRARA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E63851005504; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 16:12:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.114.62] (ovpn-114-62.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.114.62]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 771342BFEC; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 16:12:19 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] hw/arm/smmuv3: Fix addr_mask for range-based invalidation To: Zenghui Yu , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org, peter.maydell@linaro.org References: <20210130043220.1345-1-yuzenghui@huawei.com> From: Auger Eric Message-ID: Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2021 17:12:18 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210130043220.1345-1-yuzenghui@huawei.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=eric.auger@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=63.128.21.124; envelope-from=eric.auger@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -31 X-Spam_score: -3.2 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.351, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.079, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Hi Zenghui, On 1/30/21 5:32 AM, Zenghui Yu wrote: > When handling guest range-based IOTLB invalidation, we should decode the TG > field into the corresponding translation granule size so that we can pass > the correct invalidation range to backend. Set @granule to (tg * 2 + 10) to > properly emulate the architecture. > > Fixes: d52915616c05 ("hw/arm/smmuv3: Get prepared for range invalidation") > Signed-off-by: Zenghui Yu > --- > * From v1: > - Fix the compilation error > > hw/arm/smmuv3.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/hw/arm/smmuv3.c b/hw/arm/smmuv3.c > index bbca0e9f20..98b99d4fe8 100644 > --- a/hw/arm/smmuv3.c > +++ b/hw/arm/smmuv3.c > @@ -801,7 +801,7 @@ static void smmuv3_notify_iova(IOMMUMemoryRegion *mr, > { > SMMUDevice *sdev = container_of(mr, SMMUDevice, iommu); > IOMMUTLBEvent event; > - uint8_t granule = tg; > + uint8_t granule; > > if (!tg) { > SMMUEventInfo event = {.inval_ste_allowed = true}; > @@ -821,6 +821,8 @@ static void smmuv3_notify_iova(IOMMUMemoryRegion *mr, > return; > } > granule = tt->granule_sz; > + } else { > + granule = tg * 2 + 10; > } > > event.type = IOMMU_NOTIFIER_UNMAP; > Acked-by: Eric Auger Thanks Eric