From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: jrossi@linux.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
Cc: jjherne@linux.ibm.com, alifm@linux.ibm.com, farman@linux.ibm.com,
mjrosato@linux.ibm.com, zycai@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Split virtio-ccw and generic virtio
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 11:23:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <da4df4ea-91b6-4dbc-9588-15db3f55b802@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251020162023.3649165-3-jrossi@linux.ibm.com>
Hi Jared!
On 20/10/2025 18.20, jrossi@linux.ibm.com wrote:
> From: Jared Rossi <jrossi@linux.ibm.com>
>
> Separate the CCW specific virtio routines and create generic wrappers for easier
> reuse of existing virtio functions with non-CCW devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jared Rossi <jrossi@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> hw/s390x/ipl.h | 5 -
> include/hw/s390x/ipl/qipl.h | 6 +
> pc-bios/s390-ccw/iplb.h | 4 -
> pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio-ccw.h | 25 ++++
> pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio-scsi.h | 2 +-
> pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio.h | 11 +-
> pc-bios/s390-ccw/main.c | 13 +-
> pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio-blkdev.c | 57 +++++---
> pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio-ccw.c | 240 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio-net.c | 5 +-
> pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio-scsi.c | 7 +-
> pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio.c | 209 +++++----------------------
> pc-bios/s390-ccw/Makefile | 3 +-
> 13 files changed, 367 insertions(+), 220 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio-ccw.h
> create mode 100644 pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio-ccw.c
>
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/ipl.h b/hw/s390x/ipl.h
> index 505cded490..aec2244321 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/ipl.h
> +++ b/hw/s390x/ipl.h
> @@ -103,11 +103,6 @@ QEMU_BUILD_BUG_MSG(offsetof(S390IPLState, iplb) & 3, "alignment of iplb wrong");
> #define DIAG308_PV_STORE 9
> #define DIAG308_PV_START 10
>
> -#define S390_IPL_TYPE_FCP 0x00
> -#define S390_IPL_TYPE_CCW 0x02
> -#define S390_IPL_TYPE_PV 0x05
> -#define S390_IPL_TYPE_QEMU_SCSI 0xff
> -
> #define S390_IPLB_HEADER_LEN 8
> #define S390_IPLB_MIN_PV_LEN 148
> #define S390_IPLB_MIN_CCW_LEN 200
> diff --git a/include/hw/s390x/ipl/qipl.h b/include/hw/s390x/ipl/qipl.h
> index 6824391111..aadab87c2e 100644
> --- a/include/hw/s390x/ipl/qipl.h
> +++ b/include/hw/s390x/ipl/qipl.h
> @@ -20,6 +20,12 @@
> #define LOADPARM_LEN 8
> #define NO_LOADPARM "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"
>
> +#define S390_IPL_TYPE_FCP 0x00
> +#define S390_IPL_TYPE_CCW 0x02
> +#define S390_IPL_TYPE_PCI 0x04
> +#define S390_IPL_TYPE_PV 0x05
> +#define S390_IPL_TYPE_QEMU_SCSI 0xff
> +
> /*
> * The QEMU IPL Parameters will be stored at absolute address
> * 204 (0xcc) which means it is 32-bit word aligned but not
> diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/iplb.h b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/iplb.h
> index 08f259ff31..926e8eed5d 100644
> --- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/iplb.h
> +++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/iplb.h
> @@ -23,10 +23,6 @@ extern QemuIplParameters qipl;
> extern IplParameterBlock iplb __attribute__((__aligned__(PAGE_SIZE)));
> extern bool have_iplb;
>
> -#define S390_IPL_TYPE_FCP 0x00
> -#define S390_IPL_TYPE_CCW 0x02
> -#define S390_IPL_TYPE_QEMU_SCSI 0xff
This patch is doing quite a bit of different changes at once, making it hard
to review ... It would be nice if you could at least move the
"S390_IPL_TYPE_*" movement into a separate patch.
> diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio-ccw.h b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio-ccw.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..366c4812af
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio-ccw.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
> +/*
> + * Virtio definitions for CCW devices
> + *
> + * Copyright 2025 IBM Corp.
> + * Author(s): Jared Rossi <jrossi@linux.ibm.com>
> + *
> + * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef VIRTIO_CCW_H
> +#define VIRTIO_CCW_H
> +
> +/* main.c */
> +extern SubChannelId blk_schid;
> +
> +/* virtio-ccw.c */
> +int run_ccw(VDev *vdev, int cmd, void *ptr, int len, bool sli);
> +int drain_irqs_ccw(SubChannelId schid);
> +bool virtio_ccw_is_supported(SubChannelId schid);
> +int virtio_ccw_run(VDev *vdev, int vqid, VirtioCmd *cmd);
> +long virtio_ccw_notify(SubChannelId schid, int vq_idx, long cookie);
> +int virtio_ccw_setup(VDev *vdev);
> +int virtio_ccw_reset(VDev *vdev);
> +
> +#endif
> diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio-scsi.h b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio-scsi.h
> index c5612e16a2..7a37f8b45a 100644
> --- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio-scsi.h
> +++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio-scsi.h
> @@ -69,6 +69,6 @@ static inline bool virtio_scsi_response_ok(const VirtioScsiCmdResp *r)
>
> int virtio_scsi_read_many(VDev *vdev,
> unsigned long sector, void *load_addr, int sec_num);
> -int virtio_scsi_setup_device(SubChannelId schid);
> +int virtio_scsi_setup_device(void);
>
> #endif /* VIRTIO_SCSI_H */
> diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio.h b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio.h
> index 597bd42358..1c1017a0db 100644
> --- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio.h
> +++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio.h
> @@ -109,6 +109,8 @@ struct VRing {
> };
> typedef struct VRing VRing;
>
> +char *virtio_get_ring_area(void);
> +
>
> /***********************************************
> * Virtio block *
> @@ -138,6 +140,9 @@ typedef struct VRing VRing;
> /* Barrier before this op. */
> #define VIRTIO_BLK_T_BARRIER 0x80000000
>
> +/* For device bus switches */
> +extern int ipl_type;
> +
> /* This is the first element of the read scatter-gather list. */
> struct VirtioBlkOuthdr {
> /* VIRTIO_BLK_T* */
> @@ -236,6 +241,7 @@ struct VDev {
> int cmd_vr_idx;
> void *ring_area;
> long wait_reply_timeout;
> + VirtioDevType type;
> VirtioGDN guessed_disk_nature;
> SubChannelId schid;
> SenseId senseid;
> @@ -268,8 +274,9 @@ struct VirtioCmd {
> };
> typedef struct VirtioCmd VirtioCmd;
>
> +void vring_init(VRing *vr, VqInfo *info);
> bool vring_notify(VRing *vr);
> -int drain_irqs(SubChannelId schid);
> +int drain_irqs(VRing *vr);
> void vring_send_buf(VRing *vr, void *p, int len, int flags);
> int vr_poll(VRing *vr);
> int vring_wait_reply(void);
> @@ -282,7 +289,7 @@ int virtio_net_init(void *mac_addr);
> void virtio_net_deinit(void);
>
> /* virtio-blkdev.c */
> -int virtio_blk_setup_device(SubChannelId schid);
> +int virtio_blk_setup_device(void);
> int virtio_read(unsigned long sector, void *load_addr);
> unsigned long virtio_load_direct(unsigned long rec_list1, unsigned long rec_list2,
> void *load_addr);
> diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/main.c b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/main.c
> index 76bf743900..7299b8911f 100644
> --- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/main.c
> +++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/main.c
> @@ -19,11 +19,12 @@
> #include "virtio-scsi.h"
> #include "dasd-ipl.h"
>
> -static SubChannelId blk_schid = { .one = 1 };
> +SubChannelId blk_schid = { .one = 1 };
> static char loadparm_str[LOADPARM_LEN + 1];
> QemuIplParameters qipl;
> IplParameterBlock iplb __attribute__((__aligned__(PAGE_SIZE)));
> bool have_iplb;
> +int ipl_type;
Having two new global variables to pass around information is somewhat ugly...
> static uint16_t cutype;
> LowCore *lowcore; /* Yes, this *is* a pointer to address 0 */
>
> @@ -216,7 +217,7 @@ static bool find_boot_device(void)
> VDev *vdev = virtio_get_device();
> bool found = false;
>
> - switch (iplb.pbt) {
> + switch (ipl_type) {
> case S390_IPL_TYPE_CCW:
> vdev->scsi_device_selected = false;
... could we maybe set up vdev->schid here already (or in virtio_setup
below) ...
> debug_print_int("device no. ", iplb.ccw.devno);
> @@ -245,15 +246,15 @@ static int virtio_setup(void)
> vdev->is_cdrom = false;
> int ret;
>
> - switch (vdev->senseid.cu_model) {
> + switch (vdev->type) {
> case VIRTIO_ID_NET:
> puts("Network boot device detected");
> return 0;
> case VIRTIO_ID_BLOCK:
> - ret = virtio_blk_setup_device(blk_schid);
> + ret = virtio_blk_setup_device();
... and then simply pass vdev as parameter to virtio_blk_setup_device() here ...
> break;
> case VIRTIO_ID_SCSI:
> - ret = virtio_scsi_setup_device(blk_schid);
> + ret = virtio_scsi_setup_device();
... and here.
Then we don't have to make blk_schid global.
(Please also make this as a separate patch first, since this one here is
already quite complicated).
Would it also be possible to store ipl_type in the VDev, so we don't have to
make this variable global?
> break;
> default:
> puts("\n! No IPL device available !\n");
> @@ -316,11 +317,13 @@ void main(void)
> css_setup();
> have_iplb = store_iplb(&iplb);
> if (!have_iplb) {
> + ipl_type = S390_IPL_TYPE_CCW; /* Assume CCW for probing */
> boot_setup();
> probe_boot_device();
> }
>
> while (have_iplb) {
> + ipl_type = iplb.pbt;
> boot_setup();
> if (have_iplb && find_boot_device()) {
> ipl_boot_device();
> diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio-blkdev.c b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio-blkdev.c
> index 4b819dd80f..df6a6d5b70 100644
> --- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio-blkdev.c
> +++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio-blkdev.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include "s390-ccw.h"
> #include "virtio.h"
> +#include "virtio-ccw.h"
> #include "virtio-scsi.h"
>
> #define VIRTIO_BLK_F_GEOMETRY (1 << 4)
> @@ -40,9 +41,10 @@ static int virtio_blk_read_many(VDev *vdev, unsigned long sector, void *load_add
> VRING_DESC_F_WRITE | VRING_HIDDEN_IS_CHAIN);
>
> /* Now we can tell the host to read */
> + vring_notify(vr);
Why is there suddenly a new call to vring_notify() popping up here? ... if
it's necessary now, this deserves a separate patch, I think.
> vring_wait_reply();
>
> - if (drain_irqs(vr->schid)) {
> + if (drain_irqs(vr)) {
> /* Well, whatever status is supposed to contain... */
> status = 1;
> }
> @@ -53,14 +55,14 @@ int virtio_read_many(unsigned long sector, void *load_addr, int sec_num)
> {
> VDev *vdev = virtio_get_device();
>
> - switch (vdev->senseid.cu_model) {
> + switch (vdev->type) {
> case VIRTIO_ID_BLOCK:
> return virtio_blk_read_many(vdev, sector, load_addr, sec_num);
> case VIRTIO_ID_SCSI:
> return virtio_scsi_read_many(vdev, sector, load_addr, sec_num);
> + default:
> + return -1;
> }
> -
> - return -1;
> }
>
> unsigned long virtio_load_direct(unsigned long rec_list1, unsigned long rec_list2,
> @@ -119,7 +121,7 @@ void virtio_assume_iso9660(void)
> {
> VDev *vdev = virtio_get_device();
>
> - switch (vdev->senseid.cu_model) {
> + switch (vdev->type) {
> case VIRTIO_ID_BLOCK:
> vdev->guessed_disk_nature = VIRTIO_GDN_SCSI;
> vdev->config.blk.blk_size = VIRTIO_ISO_BLOCK_SIZE;
> @@ -129,6 +131,8 @@ void virtio_assume_iso9660(void)
> case VIRTIO_ID_SCSI:
> vdev->scsi_block_size = VIRTIO_ISO_BLOCK_SIZE;
> break;
> + default:
> + panic("Virtio device type mismatch for iso9660 IPL");
> }
> }
>
> @@ -139,13 +143,15 @@ void virtio_assume_eckd(void)
> vdev->guessed_disk_nature = VIRTIO_GDN_DASD;
> vdev->blk_factor = 1;
> vdev->config.blk.physical_block_exp = 0;
> - switch (vdev->senseid.cu_model) {
> + switch (vdev->type) {
> case VIRTIO_ID_BLOCK:
> vdev->config.blk.blk_size = VIRTIO_DASD_DEFAULT_BLOCK_SIZE;
> break;
> case VIRTIO_ID_SCSI:
> vdev->config.blk.blk_size = vdev->scsi_block_size;
> break;
> + default:
> + panic("Virtio device type mismatch for ECKD IPL");
> }
> vdev->config.blk.geometry.heads = 15;
> vdev->config.blk.geometry.sectors =
> @@ -162,8 +168,7 @@ bool virtio_ipl_disk_is_valid(void)
> return true;
> }
>
> - return (vdev->senseid.cu_model == VIRTIO_ID_BLOCK ||
> - vdev->senseid.cu_model == VIRTIO_ID_SCSI) &&
> + return (vdev->type == VIRTIO_ID_BLOCK || vdev->type == VIRTIO_ID_SCSI) &&
> blksize >= 512 && blksize <= 4096;
> }
>
> @@ -171,41 +176,44 @@ int virtio_get_block_size(void)
> {
> VDev *vdev = virtio_get_device();
>
> - switch (vdev->senseid.cu_model) {
> + switch (vdev->type) {
> case VIRTIO_ID_BLOCK:
> return vdev->config.blk.blk_size;
> case VIRTIO_ID_SCSI:
> return vdev->scsi_block_size;
> + default:
> + return 0;
> }
> - return 0;
> }
>
> uint8_t virtio_get_heads(void)
> {
> VDev *vdev = virtio_get_device();
>
> - switch (vdev->senseid.cu_model) {
> + switch (vdev->type) {
> case VIRTIO_ID_BLOCK:
> return vdev->config.blk.geometry.heads;
> case VIRTIO_ID_SCSI:
> return vdev->guessed_disk_nature == VIRTIO_GDN_DASD
> ? vdev->config.blk.geometry.heads : 255;
> + default:
> + return 0;
> }
> - return 0;
> }
>
> uint8_t virtio_get_sectors(void)
> {
> VDev *vdev = virtio_get_device();
>
> - switch (vdev->senseid.cu_model) {
> + switch (vdev->type) {
> case VIRTIO_ID_BLOCK:
> return vdev->config.blk.geometry.sectors;
> case VIRTIO_ID_SCSI:
> return vdev->guessed_disk_nature == VIRTIO_GDN_DASD
> ? vdev->config.blk.geometry.sectors : 63;
> + default:
> + return 0;
> }
> - return 0;
> }
>
> uint64_t virtio_get_blocks(void)
> @@ -213,24 +221,29 @@ uint64_t virtio_get_blocks(void)
> VDev *vdev = virtio_get_device();
> const uint64_t factor = virtio_get_block_size() / VIRTIO_SECTOR_SIZE;
>
> - switch (vdev->senseid.cu_model) {
> + switch (vdev->type) {
> case VIRTIO_ID_BLOCK:
> return vdev->config.blk.capacity / factor;
> case VIRTIO_ID_SCSI:
> return vdev->scsi_last_block / factor;
> + default:
> + return 0;
> }
> - return 0;
> }
>
> -int virtio_blk_setup_device(SubChannelId schid)
> +int virtio_blk_setup_device()
> {
> VDev *vdev = virtio_get_device();
>
> - vdev->guest_features[0] = VIRTIO_BLK_F_GEOMETRY | VIRTIO_BLK_F_BLK_SIZE;
> - vdev->schid = schid;
> - virtio_setup_ccw(vdev);
> -
> puts("Using virtio-blk.");
>
> - return 0;
> + vdev->guest_features[0] = VIRTIO_BLK_F_GEOMETRY | VIRTIO_BLK_F_BLK_SIZE;
> + switch (ipl_type) {
> + case S390_IPL_TYPE_QEMU_SCSI:
> + case S390_IPL_TYPE_CCW:
> + vdev->schid = blk_schid;
> + return virtio_ccw_setup(vdev);
> + }
> +
> + return 1;
> }
> diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio-ccw.c b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio-ccw.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..1d6e8532f6
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio-ccw.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,240 @@
> +/*
> + * Virtio functionality for CCW devices
> + *
> + * Copyright 2025 IBM Corp.
> + * Author(s): Jared Rossi <jrossi@linux.ibm.com>
Since you're copying over functions from another file, I think it would make
sense to add the copyright statement from the other file here, too.
> + * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> + */
> +
> +#include <string.h>
> +#include "s390-ccw.h"
> +#include "cio.h"
> +#include "virtio.h"
> +#include "virtio-ccw.h"
> +#include "virtio-scsi.h"
> +#include "bswap.h"
> +#include "helper.h"
> +#include "s390-time.h"
> +
> +/* virtio spec v1.0 para 4.3.3.2 */
> +static long kvm_hypercall(unsigned long nr, unsigned long param1,
> + unsigned long param2, unsigned long param3)
> +{
> + register unsigned long r_nr asm("1") = nr;
> + register unsigned long r_param1 asm("2") = param1;
> + register unsigned long r_param2 asm("3") = param2;
> + register unsigned long r_param3 asm("4") = param3;
> + register long retval asm("2");
> +
> + asm volatile ("diag %%r2,%%r4,0x500"
> + : "=d" (retval)
> + : "d" (r_nr), "0" (r_param1), "r"(r_param2), "d"(r_param3)
> + : "memory", "cc");
> +
> + return retval;
> +}
> +
> +bool virtio_ccw_is_supported(SubChannelId schid)
> +{
> + VDev *vdev = virtio_get_device();
> + vdev->schid = schid;
> + memset(&vdev->senseid, 0, sizeof(vdev->senseid));
> +
> + /*
> + * Run sense id command.
> + * The size of the senseid data differs between devices (notably,
> + * between virtio devices and dasds), so specify the largest possible
> + * size and suppress the incorrect length indication for smaller sizes.
> + */
> + if (run_ccw(vdev, CCW_CMD_SENSE_ID, &vdev->senseid, sizeof(vdev->senseid),
> + true)) {
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + vdev->type = vdev->senseid.cu_model;
> +
> + if (vdev->senseid.cu_type == 0x3832) {
> + switch (vdev->type) {
> + case VIRTIO_ID_BLOCK:
> + case VIRTIO_ID_SCSI:
> + case VIRTIO_ID_NET:
> + return true;
> + default:
> + return false;
> + }
> + }
> + return false;
> +}
You copied the is_supported() function to the new file, but also kept the
original. As far as I can see, virtio_ccw_is_supported() is not used at all
in your new code, so you could remove that here again? Or remove the
original function and only use this one here?
> +int drain_irqs_ccw(SubChannelId schid)
> +{
> + Irb irb = {};
> + int r = 0;
> +
> + while (1) {
> + /* FIXME: make use of TPI, for that enable subchannel and isc */
> + if (tsch(schid, &irb)) {
> + /* Might want to differentiate error codes later on. */
> + if (irb.scsw.cstat) {
> + r = -EIO;
> + } else if (irb.scsw.dstat != 0xc) {
> + r = -EIO;
> + }
> + return r;
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> +long virtio_ccw_notify(SubChannelId schid, int vq_idx, long cookie)
> +{
> + return kvm_hypercall(KVM_S390_VIRTIO_CCW_NOTIFY, *(u32 *)&schid,
> + vq_idx, cookie);
> +}
> +
> +int virtio_ccw_run(VDev *vdev, int vqid, VirtioCmd *cmd)
> +{
> + VRing *vr = &vdev->vrings[vqid];
> + int i = 0;
> +
> + do {
> + vring_send_buf(vr, cmd[i].data, cmd[i].size,
> + cmd[i].flags | (i ? VRING_HIDDEN_IS_CHAIN : 0));
> + } while (cmd[i++].flags & VRING_DESC_F_NEXT);
> +
> + vring_wait_reply();
> + if (drain_irqs(vr)) {
> + return -1;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int run_ccw(VDev *vdev, int cmd, void *ptr, int len, bool sli)
> +{
> + Ccw1 ccw = {};
> +
> + ccw.cmd_code = cmd;
> + ccw.cda = (long)ptr;
> + ccw.count = len;
> +
> + if (sli) {
> + ccw.flags |= CCW_FLAG_SLI;
> + }
> +
> + return do_cio(vdev->schid, vdev->senseid.cu_type, ptr2u32(&ccw), CCW_FMT1);
> +}
As far as I can see, run_ccw() is now only used in the new file, so you
could make this function "static".
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-21 9:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-20 16:20 [PATCH 0/7] s390x: Add support for virtio-blk-pci IPL device jrossi
2025-10-20 16:20 ` [PATCH 1/7] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Fix Misattributed Function Prototypes jrossi
2025-10-20 16:50 ` Thomas Huth
2025-10-20 18:57 ` Jared Rossi
2025-10-20 16:20 ` [PATCH 2/7] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Split virtio-ccw and generic virtio jrossi
2025-10-21 9:23 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2025-10-22 19:44 ` Jared Rossi
2025-10-20 16:20 ` [PATCH 3/7] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Introduce CLP Architecture jrossi
2025-10-21 5:24 ` Thomas Huth
2025-10-21 9:30 ` Thomas Huth
2025-10-20 16:20 ` [PATCH 4/7] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Introduce PCI device IPL format jrossi
2025-10-21 6:42 ` Thomas Huth
2025-10-23 17:31 ` Farhan Ali
2025-10-23 17:56 ` Farhan Ali
2025-10-23 18:19 ` Jared Rossi
2025-10-20 16:20 ` [PATCH 5/7] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Add support for virtio-blk-pci IPL jrossi
2025-10-21 11:11 ` Thomas Huth
2025-10-22 16:40 ` Zhuoying Cai
2025-10-22 18:57 ` Jared Rossi
2025-10-23 18:16 ` Farhan Ali
2025-10-20 16:20 ` [PATCH 6/7] s390x: Build IPLB for virtio-pci devices jrossi
2025-10-21 14:08 ` Thomas Huth
2025-10-22 19:35 ` Jared Rossi
2025-10-20 16:20 ` [PATCH 7/7] tests/qtest: Add s390x PCI boot test to cdrom-test.c jrossi
2025-10-21 14:09 ` Thomas Huth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=da4df4ea-91b6-4dbc-9588-15db3f55b802@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=alifm@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jrossi@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=zycai@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).