From: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org,
Eduardo Habkost <eduardo@habkost.net>,
Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>,
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
Cc: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
"Yanan Wang" <wangyanan55@huawei.com>,
"Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Ilya Leoshkevich" <iii@linux.ibm.com>,
"Cleber Rosa" <crosa@redhat.com>,
"Wainer dos Santos Moschetta" <wainersm@redhat.com>,
"Beraldo Leal" <bleal@redhat.com>,
"Pierre Morel" <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v22 15/20] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology polarization
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2023 16:47:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <da5bf95b465a6f1f0d7769a286be1787a49c6989.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <529821b9-71f1-a137-172a-e697feaf6abd@redhat.com>
On Thu, 2023-09-07 at 11:02 +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 01/09/2023 17.58, Nina Schoetterl-Glausch wrote:
> > From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
> >
> > Polarization is changed on a request from the guest.
> > Let's verify the polarization is accordingly set by QEMU.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
> > Co-developed-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > tests/avocado/s390_topology.py | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/avocado/s390_topology.py b/tests/avocado/s390_topology.py
> > index 3a54fe2e00..d7ee36cb89 100644
> > --- a/tests/avocado/s390_topology.py
> > +++ b/tests/avocado/s390_topology.py
> > @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ class S390CPUTopology(QemuSystemTest):
> > The polarization is changed on a request from the guest.
> > """
> > timeout = 90
> > + event_timeout = 10
> >
> > KERNEL_COMMON_COMMAND_LINE = ('printk.time=0 '
> > 'root=/dev/ram '
> > @@ -103,6 +104,14 @@ def kernel_init(self):
> > '-initrd', initrd_path,
> > '-append', kernel_command_line)
> >
> > + def system_init(self):
> > + self.log.info("System init")
> > + exec_command_and_wait_for_pattern(self,
> > + """ mount proc -t proc /proc;
> > + mount sys -t sysfs /sys;
> > + /bin/cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/dispatching """,
>
> Is the /bin/ prefix really required here?
No, /bin is a symlink to /usr/bin and that's in PATH.
Not sure why Pierre did it this way, might be a remnant of some other
vm image/initrd.
I'll remove it.
>
> > + '0')
> > +
> > def test_single(self):
> > """
> > This test checks the simplest topology with a single CPU.
> > @@ -198,3 +207,39 @@ def test_hotplug_full(self):
> > self.check_topology(3, 1, 1, 1, 'high', False)
> > self.check_topology(4, 1, 1, 1, 'medium', False)
> > self.check_topology(5, 2, 1, 1, 'high', True)
> > +
> > +
> > + def guest_set_dispatching(self, dispatching):
> > + exec_command(self,
> > + f'echo {dispatching} > /sys/devices/system/cpu/dispatching')
> > + self.vm.event_wait('CPU_POLARIZATION_CHANGE', self.event_timeout)
> > + exec_command_and_wait_for_pattern(self,
> > + '/bin/cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/dispatching', dispatching)
>
> dito?
>
> > +
> > + def test_polarization(self):
> > + """
> > + This test verifies that QEMU modifies the entitlement change after
> > + several guest polarization change requests.
> > +
> > + :avocado: tags=arch:s390x
> > + :avocado: tags=machine:s390-ccw-virtio
> > + """
> > + self.kernel_init()
> > + self.vm.launch()
> > + self.wait_until_booted()
> > +
> > + self.system_init()
> > + res = self.vm.qmp('query-s390x-cpu-polarization')
> > + self.assertEqual(res['return']['polarization'], 'horizontal')
> > + self.check_topology(0, 0, 0, 0, 'medium', False)
> > +
> > + self.guest_set_dispatching('1');
> > + res = self.vm.qmp('query-s390x-cpu-polarization')
> > + self.assertEqual(res['return']['polarization'], 'vertical')
> > + self.check_topology(0, 0, 0, 0, 'medium', False)
> > +
> > + self.guest_set_dispatching('0');
> > + res = self.vm.qmp('query-s390x-cpu-polarization')
> > + self.assertEqual(res['return']['polarization'], 'horizontal')
> > + self.check_topology(0, 0, 0, 0, 'medium', False)
>
> Anyway:
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-08 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-01 15:57 [PATCH v22 00/20] s390x: CPU Topology Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-01 15:57 ` [PATCH v22 01/20] CPU topology: extend with s390 specifics Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-05 9:01 ` Thomas Huth
2023-09-01 15:57 ` [PATCH v22 02/20] s390x/cpu topology: add topology entries on CPU hotplug Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-05 12:28 ` Thomas Huth
2023-09-01 15:57 ` [PATCH v22 03/20] target/s390x/cpu topology: handle STSI(15) and build the SYSIB Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-04 18:23 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-05 13:26 ` Thomas Huth
2023-09-05 15:25 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-06 8:21 ` Thomas Huth
2023-09-06 12:12 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-06 14:53 ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-09-01 15:57 ` [PATCH v22 04/20] s390x/sclp: reporting the maximum nested topology entries Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-01 15:57 ` [PATCH v22 05/20] s390x/cpu topology: resetting the Topology-Change-Report Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-01 15:57 ` [PATCH v22 06/20] s390x/cpu topology: interception of PTF instruction Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-01 15:57 ` [PATCH v22 07/20] target/s390x/cpu topology: activate CPU topology Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-01 15:58 ` [PATCH v22 08/20] qapi/s390x/cpu topology: set-cpu-topology qmp command Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-06 8:56 ` Thomas Huth
2023-09-01 15:58 ` [PATCH v22 09/20] machine: adding s390 topology to query-cpu-fast Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-06 9:10 ` Thomas Huth
2023-09-01 15:58 ` [PATCH v22 10/20] machine: adding s390 topology to info hotpluggable-cpus Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-06 9:14 ` Thomas Huth
2023-09-01 15:58 ` [PATCH v22 11/20] qapi/s390x/cpu topology: CPU_POLARIZATION_CHANGE qapi event Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-01 15:58 ` [PATCH v22 12/20] qapi/s390x/cpu topology: query-cpu-polarization qmp command Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-01 15:58 ` [PATCH v22 13/20] docs/s390x/cpu topology: document s390x cpu topology Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-07 8:15 ` Thomas Huth
2023-09-01 15:58 ` [PATCH v22 14/20] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology core Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-04 18:44 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-07 8:27 ` Thomas Huth
2023-09-08 14:27 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-01 15:58 ` [PATCH v22 15/20] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology polarization Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-04 19:43 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-07 9:02 ` Thomas Huth
2023-09-08 14:47 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch [this message]
2023-09-01 15:58 ` [PATCH v22 16/20] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology entitlement tests Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-04 19:51 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-07 9:05 ` Thomas Huth
2023-09-08 18:30 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-01 15:58 ` [PATCH v22 17/20] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology test dedicated CPU Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-04 19:54 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-07 10:08 ` Thomas Huth
2023-09-01 15:58 ` [PATCH v22 18/20] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology test socket full Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-01 15:58 ` [PATCH v22 19/20] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology dedicated errors Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-01 15:58 ` [PATCH v22 20/20] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology bad move Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=da5bf95b465a6f1f0d7769a286be1787a49c6989.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=nsg@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=bleal@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=crosa@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=wainersm@redhat.com \
--cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).