From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1Cefev-0003gV-70
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 15:22:05 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1Cefeo-0003fJ-TY
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 15:22:01 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Cefeo-0003f4-N8
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 15:21:58 -0500
Received: from [64.233.184.201] (helo=wproxy.gmail.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CefR8-0006ck-6N
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 15:07:50 -0500
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so124635wri
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 12:07:48 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <da63183704121512076248f40a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 21:07:48 +0100
From: Piotras <piotras@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] page fault during ins
In-Reply-To: <200412151836.iBFIakwR001964@imap.tools.intra>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <200412151836.iBFIakwR001964@imap.tools.intra>
Reply-To: Piotras <piotras@gmail.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Juergen Keil <jk@tools.de>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Leo Whitman confirmed your results.

No luck this time;-(


Regards,

Piotrek

On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 19:36:46 +0100 (CET), Juergen Keil <jk@tools.de> wrote:
> > Maybe someone who experiences the problem could check the attached
> > patch? The patch is not really correct, but chances are it could help.
> 
> > diff -ru qemu-0.6.1/target-i386/translate.c
> > qemu-0.6.1-A-prepare/target-i386/translate.c
> > --- qemu-0.6.1/target-i386/translate.c        2004-11-14 21:51:33.000000000 +0100
> > +++ qemu-0.6.1-A-prepare/target-i386/translate.c      2004-12-14 17:32:29.000000000 +0100
> > @@ -874,8 +874,10 @@
> >
> >  static inline void gen_ins(DisasContext *s, int ot)
> >  {
> > -    gen_op_in_DX_T0[ot]();
> >      gen_string_movl_A0_EDI(s);
> > +    /* XXX: this is not correct, find another solution to avoid side-effect on restart (mmu fault) */
> > +    gen_op_st_T0_A0[ot + s->mem_index]();
> > +    gen_op_in_DX_T0[ot]();
> >      gen_op_st_T0_A0[ot + s->mem_index]();
> >      gen_op_movl_T0_Dshift[ot]();
> >      if (s->aflag) {
> 
> I seems this patch doesn't help.  I just tried a W2K install on a 1G
> qemu qcow HDD (host OS: Solaris x86), and got the "disk full" problem.