From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HXLGz-0006Ke-9Q
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Mar 2007 13:52:25 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HXLGy-0006KR-1t
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Mar 2007 13:52:24 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HXLGx-0006KO-US
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Mar 2007 12:52:23 -0500
Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.244])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <jonathan.kalbfeld@gmail.com>) id 1HXLEF-0005EB-1G
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Mar 2007 13:49:35 -0400
Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id d40so1214616and
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fri, 30 Mar 2007 10:49:34 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <db7b3ca90703301049m26787017pe589e2f53aa3bff4@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 10:49:34 -0700
From: "Jonathan Kalbfeld" <jonathan.kalbfeld@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] add a simple 24mhz clock for the versatile
In-Reply-To: <200703301828.56471.paul@codesourcery.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_58992_30248815.1175276974356"
References: <460D3F4D.10400@windriver.com>
	<200703301828.56471.paul@codesourcery.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

------=_Part_58992_30248815.1175276974356
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

If you're ok you can shift it left 4 bits, then add half that result then
shift right 10 bits.

Of course, you'll only get 23.4Mhz that way :-)

jonathan

On 3/30/07, Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>
> > + uint64_t now = qemu_get_clock(vm_clock);
> > + return (uint32_t)(now*.024);
>
> We should be able to do this without resorting to floating point
> arithmetic.
>
> Paul
>
>
>


-- 
--
Jonathan Kalbfeld
+1 323 620 6682

------=_Part_58992_30248815.1175276974356
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

If you&#39;re ok you can shift it left 4 bits, then add half that result then shift right 10 bits.<br><br>Of course, you&#39;ll only get 23.4Mhz that way :-)<br><br>jonathan<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 3/30/07, 
<b class="gmail_sendername">Paul Brook</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:paul@codesourcery.com">paul@codesourcery.com</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
&gt; + uint64_t now = qemu_get_clock(vm_clock);<br>&gt; + return (uint32_t)(now*.024);<br><br>We should be able to do this without resorting to floating point arithmetic.<br><br>Paul<br><br><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all">
<br>-- <br>--<br>Jonathan Kalbfeld<br>+1 323 620 6682

------=_Part_58992_30248815.1175276974356--