From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
libvir-list@redhat.com,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
"Reinoud Zandijk" <reinoud@netbsd.org>,
"Ryo ONODERA" <ryoon@netbsd.org>,
"Brad Smith" <brad@comstyle.com>, "Stefan Weil" <sw@weilnetz.de>,
"Maxim Levitsky" <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
"Sean Christopherson" <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/about/deprecated: Deprecate 32-bit host systems
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 20:49:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dbe6f1de-b67e-5ece-cc27-698da4387677@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b55b506e-5a73-329a-24ee-14eafc5a95c1@redhat.com>
On 17/02/2023 17.38, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 2/17/23 11:47, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 11:36:41AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>> I feel the discussion petered out without a conclusion.
>>>
>>> I don't think letting the status quo win by inertia is a good outcome
>>> here.
>>>
>>> Which 32-bit hosts are still useful, and why?
>>
>> Which 32-bit hosts does Linux still provide KVM support for.
>
> All except ARM: MIPS, x86, PPC and RISC-V.
>
> I would like to remove x86, but encountered some objections.
So if I got that right:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/b8fa9561295bb6af2b7fcaa8125c6a3b89b305c7.camel@redhat.com/
... the objection is mainly that some kernel developers want to keep the
code around for easier testing of nested 32-bit guests L1 hypervisors.
If that's the only use case that is still around for the 32-bit KVM x86
kernel code, I guess it should also be fine to use older versions of QEMU in
those L1 hypervisor guests (assuming you have to use an older 32-bit Linux
distro for this anyway).
So unless I got that wrong, there is really nobody around anymore who needs
an *upstream* QEMU for running 32-bit x86 KVM hosts, is there?
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I think we can really deprecated at
least qemu-system-i386 and qemu-system-arm now, can't we?
Thanks,
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-17 19:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-30 11:44 [RFC PATCH] docs/about/deprecated: Deprecate 32-bit host systems Thomas Huth
2023-01-30 11:47 ` Peter Maydell
2023-01-30 12:01 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-01-30 12:22 ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-30 12:43 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-01-30 13:07 ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-30 19:19 ` Richard Henderson
2023-01-30 23:14 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-01-30 23:33 ` Richard Henderson
2023-01-31 0:19 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-01-30 20:45 ` Alex Bennée
2023-02-05 22:12 ` Mark Cave-Ayland
2023-04-04 14:00 ` Thomas Huth
2023-04-04 14:20 ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-04-04 15:58 ` BALATON Zoltan
2023-04-04 14:32 ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-04-04 15:42 ` BALATON Zoltan
2023-04-05 8:01 ` Thomas Huth
2023-04-05 11:54 ` BALATON Zoltan
2023-04-05 12:51 ` Thomas Huth
2023-04-04 15:50 ` BALATON Zoltan
2023-04-05 21:01 ` Mark Cave-Ayland
2023-02-22 9:11 ` Bernhard Beschow
2023-02-22 9:51 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-02-22 12:28 ` Reinoud Zandijk
2023-02-22 13:37 ` Alex Bennée
2023-02-17 10:36 ` Markus Armbruster
2023-02-17 10:40 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-02-17 10:45 ` Claudio Fontana
2023-02-17 10:47 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-02-17 11:05 ` Stefan Weil via
2023-02-17 11:43 ` Markus Armbruster
2023-02-17 11:47 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-02-19 11:27 ` Reinoud Zandijk
2023-02-19 12:12 ` Stefan Weil via
2023-02-17 16:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-02-17 17:43 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-02-17 18:57 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-18 22:54 ` Jiaxun Yang
2023-02-17 19:49 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2023-02-17 16:06 ` Reinoud Zandijk
2023-02-17 17:20 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-02-17 18:22 ` Richard Henderson
2023-02-19 11:07 ` Reinoud Zandijk
2023-02-17 11:09 ` Claudio Fontana
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dbe6f1de-b67e-5ece-cc27-698da4387677@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=brad@comstyle.com \
--cc=libvir-list@redhat.com \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=reinoud@netbsd.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=ryoon@netbsd.org \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=sw@weilnetz.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).