qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
	"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@gmail.com>
Cc: "QEMU Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <f4bug@amsat.org>,
	"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	"Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: Should we maybe move Cirrus-CI jobs away from Gitlab again?
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 20:40:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dc108d7d-297b-5a84-68dd-12da3a0e68d0@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YzM5i5QP7NQq4OHV@redhat.com>

On 27/09/2022 19.57, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 01:36:20PM -0400, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> On Tue, 27 Sept 2022 at 11:54, Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 11:44:45AM -0400, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 27 Sept 2022 at 05:02, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>> now that Gitlab is giving us pressure on the amount of free CI minutes, I
>>>>> wonder whether we should maybe move the Cirrus-CI jobs out of the gitlab-CI
>>>>> dashboard again? We could add the jobs to our .cirrus-ci.yml file instead,
>>>>> like we did it in former times...
>>>>>
>>>>> Big advantage would be of course that the time for those jobs would not
>>>>> count in the Gitlab-CI minutes anymore. Disadvantage is of course that they
>>>>> do not show up in the gitlab-CI dashboard anymore, so there is no more
>>>>> e-mail notification about failed jobs, and you have to push to github, too,
>>>>> and finally check the results manually on cirrus-ci.com ...
>>>>
>>>> My understanding is that .gitlab-ci.d/cirrus.yml uses a GitLab CI job
>>>> to run the cirrus-run container image that forwards jobs to Cirrus-CI.
>>>> So GitLab CI resources are consumed waiting for Cirrus-CI to finish.
>>>>
>>>> This shouldn't affect gitlab.com/qemu-project where there are private
>>>> runners that do not consume GitLab CI minutes.
>>>>
>>>> Individual developers are affected though because they most likely
>>>> rely on the GitLab shared runner minutes quota.
>>>
>>> NB, none of the jobs should ever be run automatically anymore in
>>> QEMU CI pipelines. It always requires the maintainer to set the
>>> env var when pushing to git, to explicitly create a pipeline.
>>> You can then selectively start each individual job as desired.
>>
>> Cirrus CI is not automatically started when pushing to a personal
>> GitLab repo? If starting it requires manual action anyway then I think
>> nothing needs to be changed here.
> 
> No pipeline at all is created unless you do
> 
>    git push -o ci.variable=QEMU_CI=1 <your-fork-remote>
> 
> that creates the pipeliune but doesn't run any jobs - they're manual
> start.

Yes, sure, the jobs are not started automatically. But I *do* want to run 
the jobs before sending pull requests - but since the gitlab-CI minutes are 
now very limited, I'd like to avoid burning these minutes via gitlab and 
start those jobs directly on cirrus-ci.com again. For that the jobs would 
need to be moved to our .cirrus-ci.yml file again.

Well, maybe we could also have both, jobs via cirrus-run for those who want 
to see them in their gitlab-CI dashboard, and via .cirrus-ci.yml for those 
who want to avoid burning CI minutes on Gitlab. It's a little bit of 
double-maintenance, but maybe acceptable?

  Thomas



  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-27 18:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-27  8:22 Should we maybe move Cirrus-CI jobs away from Gitlab again? Thomas Huth
2022-09-27 15:44 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-09-27 15:54   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-09-27 17:36     ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-09-27 17:57       ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-09-27 18:40         ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2022-09-27 18:47           ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-09-27 19:04             ` Thomas Huth
2022-09-27 19:10               ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-09-28  6:32                 ` Thomas Huth
2022-09-28  7:10                 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-09-28  7:24           ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-09-28 12:27             ` Alex Bennée
2022-09-28 12:56               ` Stefan Hajnoczi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dc108d7d-297b-5a84-68dd-12da3a0e68d0@redhat.com \
    --to=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=f4bug@amsat.org \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).