From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56017) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dijrk-0000Zp-JR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 18 Aug 2017 12:11:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dijrg-0003d0-HL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 18 Aug 2017 12:11:20 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:55310) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dijrg-0003cl-B5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 18 Aug 2017 12:11:16 -0400 References: <20170818114353.13455-1-david@redhat.com> <20170818114353.13455-9-david@redhat.com> From: Thomas Huth Message-ID: Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 18:11:09 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170818114353.13455-9-david@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 for-2.11 08/18] target/s390x: move gtod_*() declarations to s390-virtio.h List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: David Hildenbrand , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: rth@twiddle.net, Aurelien Jarno , cohuck@redhat.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= Suggesting to add a patch description like: "The functions are not used in target/s390x/ so a header in hw/s390x/ is a better place" ? On 18.08.2017 13:43, David Hildenbrand wrote: > Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand > --- > hw/s390x/s390-virtio.h | 2 ++ > target/s390x/cpu.h | 3 --- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Anyway: Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth