Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] s390x/pv: Introduce a s390_pv_check() helper for runtime

[Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>]

On 16/01/2023 18.46, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> From: Cédric Le Goater <clg@redhat.com>
> 
> If a secure kernel is started in a non-protected VM, the OS will hang
> during boot without giving a proper error message to the user.
> 
> Perform the checks on Confidential Guest support at runtime with an
> helper called from the service call switching the guest to protected
> mode.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@redhat.com>
> ---
> 
>    In s390_pv_check(), drop the call to s390_pv_guest_check() since
>    init time has already checked the same conditions. However, to
>    report an error when the machine is not protected and the kernel
>    secure, we still need s390_pv_check().

Basically Ack for this patch ... I'm just wondering whether we should maybe 
use a different name for the function. We now have s390_pv_guest_check() and 
390_pv_check() ... hard to distinguish. Maybe we should call them 
s390_pv_initial_check() and s390_pv_runtime_check() (or 
s390_pv_diag308_check()) or something similar instead?

  Thomas