From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DzFn3-0007w8-FA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 11:31:51 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DzFmv-0007tB-Nu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 11:31:45 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DzFmv-0007s3-HT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 11:31:41 -0400 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1DzFp8-00029I-FO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 11:33:58 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1DzFch-00032t-DC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 17:21:07 +0200 Received: from 212.204.94.5 ([212.204.94.5]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 17:21:07 +0200 Received: from Rudi by 212.204.94.5 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 17:21:07 +0200 From: Rudi Lippert Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 17:25:54 +0200 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Sender: news Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: Re: no start on amd64 (was "Nothing happens") Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hey! Looks like there really is an SDL problem. I'm not capable of writing a test program, but I tried sdlroids. It hangs in status S+ right after starting it. After I found out about this, I rebuilt libsdl (Gentoo package), but it didn't help. What's next? Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, 31 Jul 2005, Rudi Lippert wrote: > >> Is there anything else that might help understanding the problem? > > Do you have other programs running, which use SDL? Sorry, the configure > output does not help here. > >> Btw: Qemu is not even taking up CPU. > > That's right. It hangs in a select() when waiting for writable buffers. > That can mean a whole lot of anything. I doubt that you'll find out, > unless you're writing a small test program yourself, just initializing > SDL. > > Ciao, > Dscho