From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2183CC33C8C for ; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 14:17:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E014620731 for ; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 14:17:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="FbY4pDHk" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E014620731 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:52312 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ioTBp-0007Ct-1m for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 09:17:05 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60589) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ioTAz-0006gZ-9A for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 09:16:15 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ioTAy-0006y9-8t for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 09:16:13 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-x743.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::743]:37775) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ioTAs-0006eZ-9a; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 09:16:06 -0500 Received: by mail-qk1-x743.google.com with SMTP id 21so39537693qky.4; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 06:16:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4GeIjC3aEEZC33G7wpjwbmQhBnrZvM32nlecyXy0AJI=; b=FbY4pDHkiECQAvlvcVnGsBOOnb6RGORc/9gS9zL4nndXWBXNPlc5Zmxsn9ipeDnDe8 2QPcBEW6CjMeKz0/i6kahVJcA/pUUZIFfITLO8vOQAfsDdgv3FFLrfdxCwwtpggV2W3+ Thki8j3BREqp08tynaA0teCqEHHMFe1nYPBb2se+s2jjBRcHD6j+g3IQgPfh4zwD9zOE pwpqpS3FNsCMK2XnFFk7O8QCY6VDVRPZrr01WEN4cIwk5Mn067evdH2YjRUK3mBrkhcA kkD9fo0kTsjr24IeuUVgMRLfPIi3jOxd94qjzgT3KpKLiEG74h9aLKKwVx+cXgoQrUQD K+vQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=4GeIjC3aEEZC33G7wpjwbmQhBnrZvM32nlecyXy0AJI=; b=e4WmCi7q+1oHRboL+2RaTSL8lIw6K3RDkWRdK/o3Pf1bz+CKK1MpL7/RjtW5qyp3hh EHgHjGRcY0Qn48/n182S+Vg6poOeO139aFBRjWxTL+XZ2LvKnX9MmXLGS5Pfl4Mh4HqE 9G2AZlQM5iHw+F5OjVvqtCye8Az7XfgUnmCa9UeqbkNEOeMcVF3K70GSa5U2A2BJ8b7y sMP2gvgbBvaSqUILtB0rS9yWsfZdn4gHXfETDWCKjM4RNC6ir5EPsAa9FQniZPsAdXsJ gOvJEQp17lE5StD5j9I3x1Sv4tnB17p4V10RVqnOQ6hHXXp1LTa2O0PuFkn43PEkhj8B Au4Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVvFeZYbszJLdAQkAFsegf9exLeLi3ZKvn7Ip+TZP3ajPc9CIea FQnkjo7cyrj81evL9ps5vBs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzNjkd5aFRJ/ZJT7ZGE1I47NFeG4dZLdoY9Hn9Zl0zrHg4nrla9kBoPYQoXekhkUcWzzgDjgQ== X-Received: by 2002:a37:9ec2:: with SMTP id h185mr81561040qke.14.1578320164403; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 06:16:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2804:431:c7c6:655b:9e1c:e865:3705:e1df? ([2804:431:c7c6:655b:9e1c:e865:3705:e1df]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k1sm19672896qtq.86.2020.01.06.06.16.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 06 Jan 2020 06:16:04 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH qemu] spapr: Kill SLOF To: Alexey Kardashevskiy , qemu-devel@nongnu.org References: <20200103074404.30853-1-aik@ozlabs.ru> <3cf3e733-199a-61ba-7aaa-05e9546cd4d9@ozlabs.ru> From: Daniel Henrique Barboza Message-ID: Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2020 11:15:57 -0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3cf3e733-199a-61ba-7aaa-05e9546cd4d9@ozlabs.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4864:20::743 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Jose Ricardo Ziviani , Fabiano Rosas , Sam Bobroff , Michael Ellerman , Michael Roth , Nicholas Piggin , Paul Mackerras , qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?Leonardo_Augusto_Guimar=c3=a3es_Garcia?= , Leonardo Bras , David Gibson Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Hey, On 1/5/20 8:38 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > Another version is coming, I'll start putting fewer people in the cc: > list, watch qemu-ppc@nongnu.org for further updates if interested. Thanks, Question: does Petitboot already replaces SLOF in every possible scenario for all the spapr machine features? Or is Petitboot 'good enough' to get the ball rolling and then we'll incrementally improve Petitboot/spapr code to add the missing bits? I am asking because this "SLOF-less" feature is something we'll want to expose on Libvirt - users will sure enjoy enjoy the shorter boot time - and I want to brace for impact when users starts opening bugs about the SLOF-less machine missing stuff that the SLOF version does. Thanks, DHB