Re: [PATCH 00/11] fix memory leak while kset_register() fails

[Luben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@amd.com>]

On 2022-10-21 05:56, Yang Yingliang wrote:
> 
> On 2022/10/21 17:08, Luben Tuikov wrote:
>> On 2022-10-21 04:59, Yang Yingliang wrote:
>>> On 2022/10/21 16:36, Greg KH wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 04:24:23PM +0800, Yang Yingliang wrote:
>>>>> On 2022/10/21 13:37, Greg KH wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 01:29:31AM -0400, Luben Tuikov wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2022-10-20 22:20, Yang Yingliang wrote:
>>>>>>>> The previous discussion link:
>>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flore.kernel.org%2Flkml%2F0db486eb-6927-927e-3629-958f8f211194%40huawei.com%2FT%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cluben.tuikov%40amd.com%7C2597f1097c204be54c7c08dab34a8654%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C638019429914730071%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=NNVCtbTxI5uzxxJA9mKvnsy8d3jyudtl1u4CTcm3tsU%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>> The very first discussion on this was here:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.spinics.net%2Flists%2Fdri-devel%2Fmsg368077.html&data=05%7C01%7Cluben.tuikov%40amd.com%7C2597f1097c204be54c7c08dab34a8654%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C638019429914886316%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=ByCQk0qGktyyoNQg8IFj5AGxmaeWOXnbIA4rFnX%2B6%2BA%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please use this link, and not the that one up there you which quoted above,
>>>>>>> and whose commit description is taken verbatim from the this link.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> kset_register() is currently used in some places without calling
>>>>>>>> kset_put() in error path, because the callers think it should be
>>>>>>>> kset internal thing to do, but the driver core can not know what
>>>>>>>> caller doing with that memory at times. The memory could be freed
>>>>>>>> both in kset_put() and error path of caller, if it is called in
>>>>>>>> kset_register().
>>>>>>> As I explained in the link above, the reason there's
>>>>>>> a memory leak is that one cannot call kset_register() without
>>>>>>> the kset->kobj.name being set--kobj_add_internal() returns -EINVAL,
>>>>>>> in this case, i.e. kset_register() fails with -EINVAL.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thus, the most common usage is something like this:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 	kobj_set_name(&kset->kobj, format, ...);
>>>>>>> 	kset->kobj.kset = parent_kset;
>>>>>>> 	kset->kobj.ktype = ktype;
>>>>>>> 	res = kset_register(kset);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So, what is being leaked, is the memory allocated in kobj_set_name(),
>>>>>>> by the common idiom shown above. This needs to be mentioned in
>>>>>>> the documentation, at least, in case, in the future this is absolved
>>>>>>> in kset_register() redesign, etc.
>>>>>> Based on this, can kset_register() just clean up from itself when an
>>>>>> error happens?  Ideally that would be the case, as the odds of a kset
>>>>>> being embedded in a larger structure is probably slim, but we would have
>>>>>> to search the tree to make sure.
>>>>> I have search the whole tree, the kset used in bus_register() - patch #3,
>>>>> kset_create_and_add() - patch #4
>>>>> __class_register() - patch #5,  fw_cfg_build_symlink() - patch #6 and
>>>>> amdgpu_discovery.c - patch #10
>>>>> is embedded in a larger structure. In these cases, we can not call
>>>>> kset_put() in error path in kset_register()
>>>> Yes you can as the kobject in the kset should NOT be controling the
>>>> lifespan of those larger objects.
>>>>
>>>> If it is, please point out the call chain here as I don't think that
>>>> should be possible.
>>>>
>>>> Note all of this is a mess because the kobject name stuff was added much
>>>> later, after the driver model had been created and running for a while.
>>>> We missed this error path when adding the dynamic kobject name logic,
>>>> thank for looking into this.
>>>>
>>>> If you could test the patch posted with your error injection systems,
>>>> that could make this all much simpler to solve.
>>> The patch posted by Luben will cause double free in some cases.
>> Yes, I figured this out in the other email and posted the scenario Greg
>> was asking about.
>>
>> But I believe the question still stands if we can do kset_put()
>> after a *failed* kset_register(), namely if more is being done than
>> necessary, which is just to free the memory allocated by
>> kobject_set_name().
> The name memory is allocated in kobject_set_name() in caller,  and I 
> think caller
> free the memory that it allocated is reasonable, it's weird that some 
> callers allocate
> some memory and use function (kset_register) failed, then it free the 
> memory allocated
> in callers,  I think use kset_put()/kfree_const(name) in caller seems 
> more reasonable.

kset_put() would work only in implementations, such as amdgpu_discovery.c,
where the ktype.release is defined and it frees the embedding object in
which the kset is embedded.

Depending on the implementation, you may need to call kfree_const(name).

And this is why this needs to be documented in kset_register(), as I noted
in the review earlier.

Regards,
Luben