From: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
Damien Hedde <dhedde@kalrayinc.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, Klaus Jensen <its@irrelevant.dk>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Titouan Huard <thuard@kalrayinc.com>,
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: NVME hotplug support ?
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 07:52:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <de06e322-37e9-4788-97a2-c9f16a68cd2e@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <499096d7-1b4d-471b-9abf-5b6f72bb7990@suse.de>
Hi Hannes,
[+Markus as QOM/QDev rubber duck]
On 23/1/24 13:40, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 1/23/24 11:59, Damien Hedde wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We are currently looking into hotplugging nvme devices and it is
>> currently not possible:
>> When nvme was introduced 2 years ago, the feature was disabled.
>>> commit cc6fb6bc506e6c47ed604fcb7b7413dff0b7d845
>>> Author: Klaus Jensen
>>> Date: Tue Jul 6 10:48:40 2021 +0200
>>>
>>> hw/nvme: mark nvme-subsys non-hotpluggable
>>> We currently lack the infrastructure to handle subsystem
>>> hotplugging, so
>>> disable it.
>>
>> Do someone know what's lacking or anyone have some tips/idea of what
>> we should develop to add the support ?
>>
> Problem is that the object model is messed up. In qemu namespaces are
> attached to controllers, which in turn are children of the PCI device.
> There are subsystems, but these just reference the controller.
>
> So if you hotunplug the PCI device you detach/destroy the controller and
> detach the namespaces from the controller.
> But if you hotplug the PCI device again the NVMe controller will be
> attached to the PCI device, but the namespace are still be detached.
>
> Klaus said he was going to fix that, and I dimly remember some patches
> floating around. But apparently it never went anywhere.
>
> Fundamental problem is that the NVMe hierarchy as per spec is
> incompatible with the qemu object model; qemu requires a strict
> tree model where every object has exactly _one_ parent.
The modelling problem is not clear to me.
Do you have an example of how the NVMe hierarchy should be?
Thanks,
Phil.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-24 6:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-23 10:59 NVME hotplug support ? Damien Hedde
2024-01-23 11:15 ` Klaus Jensen
2024-01-23 12:40 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-01-24 6:52 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [this message]
2024-01-24 7:47 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-01-29 13:13 ` Damien Hedde
2024-01-29 13:37 ` Klaus Jensen
2024-01-29 15:35 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-02-05 13:33 ` Damien Hedde
2024-01-24 7:39 ` Klaus Jensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=de06e322-37e9-4788-97a2-c9f16a68cd2e@linaro.org \
--to=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=dhedde@kalrayinc.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=its@irrelevant.dk \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuard@kalrayinc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).