Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] pseries NUMA distance calculation

[Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>]

On 10/8/20 6:13 AM, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Wed,  7 Oct 2020 14:28:44 -0300
> Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> This forth version is based on review comments and suggestion
> 
> Series for SLOF ? ;-) ;-) ;-)


hahahaha sad thing is that a typo in "fourth" is the only viable
way for me to send a Forth series. SLOF is too damn hard!




> 
>> from David in v3.
>>
>> changes from v3:
>> - patch 4:
>>      * copied the explanation in spapr_numa_define_associativity_domains()
>>        to the commit message
>>      * return numa_level directly instead of calculating a temp
>>        value in spapr_numa_get_numa_level()
>>      * we're now setting assoc_src in all n_levels above it in
>>        spapr_numa_define_associativity_domains()
>> - patch 5:
>>      * changed the documentation as suggested by David
>>
>> v3 link: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-09/msg10443.html
>>
>> Daniel Henrique Barboza (5):
>>    spapr: add spapr_machine_using_legacy_numa() helper
>>    spapr_numa: forbid asymmetrical NUMA setups
>>    spapr_numa: change reference-points and maxdomain settings
>>    spapr_numa: consider user input when defining associativity
>>    specs/ppc-spapr-numa: update with new NUMA support
>>
>>   capstone                      |   2 +-
>>   docs/specs/ppc-spapr-numa.rst | 235 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>   hw/ppc/spapr.c                |  12 ++
>>   hw/ppc/spapr_numa.c           | 185 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>   include/hw/ppc/spapr.h        |   2 +
>>   5 files changed, 419 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>
>