qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
	Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
	Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay@linux.ibm.com>,
	Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.ibm.com>,
	Viktor Mihajlovski <mihajlov@linux.ibm.com>,
	Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] s390/ipl: sync back loadparm
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:42:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dfa98eb8-bf78-9d61-121c-61ee211e6bc5@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200309133223.100491-1-pasic@linux.ibm.com>

On 09.03.20 14:32, Halil Pasic wrote:
> We expose loadparm as a r/w machine property, but if loadparm is set by
> the guest via DIAG 308, we don't update the property. Having a
> disconnect between the guest view and the QEMU property is not nice in
> itself, but things get even worse for SCSI, where under certain
> circumstances (see 789b5a401b "s390: Ensure IPL from SCSI works as
> expected" for details) we call s390_gen_initial_iplb() on resets
> effectively overwriting the guest/user supplied loadparm with the stale
> value.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
> Fixes: 7104bae9de ("hw/s390x: provide loadparm property for the machine")
> Reported-by: Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Viktor Mihajlovski <mihajlov@linux.ibm.com>
> Tested-by: Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay@linux.ibm.com>

Thanks applied with the reverse xmas tree change.



      parent reply	other threads:[~2020-03-10  8:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-09 13:32 [PATCH v2 1/1] s390/ipl: sync back loadparm Halil Pasic
2020-03-09 13:44 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-09 14:27   ` Halil Pasic
2020-03-09 14:48     ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-10  8:42 ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dfa98eb8-bf78-9d61-121c-61ee211e6bc5@de.ibm.com \
    --to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mhartmay@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mihajlov@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mimu@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).