From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PULL v7 000/151] Meson-based build system
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 00:08:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e020de7b-2ec6-c2ac-97f1-3da9d874fd45@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3689e853-b267-a553-a78f-d906618512db@redhat.com>
On 19/08/20 23:59, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 8/19/20 4:32 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> The following changes since commit
>> d0ed6a69d399ae193959225cdeaa9382746c91cc:
>>
>> Update version for v5.1.0 release (2020-08-11 17:07:03 +0100)
>>
>> are available in the Git repository at:
>>
>> https://gitlab.com/bonzini/qemu.git tags/for-upstream
>
> Unrelated to the pull request proper, but I note in MAINTAINERS that you
> have listed:
>
> T: git https://github.com/bonzini/qemu.git scsi-next
>
> Have you switched to gitlab as your personal mirroring preference, and
> if so, should MAINTAINERS be updated?
Yes, but also I've not used a scsi-next branch for years. :)
>> for you to fetch changes up to 2eddb3c65821dce76433d5da6f3e6419349d1b77:
>>
>> docs: convert build system documentation to rST (2020-08-19
>> 16:13:30 -0400)
>>
>> v6->v7:
>> * new patch to preserve compatibility symlinks from previous binary
>> locations
>> * fixed cut-and-paste error in linux-user/mips/meson.build
>> * preserve compatibility check-block target even if no block tests are
>> defined
>
> FWIW: I haven't done any review or testing of the earlier iterations of
> this series. But since it will be landing soon, I merged this tag to an
> incremental build tree that was previously sitting on a finished 5.1
> build (sources in qemu/, VPATH build in qemu/build/), typed 'make' then
> 'make check', and everything finished successfully at least for my
> typical setup. So good job on getting this massive rewrite in while
> still preserving at least the common 'make' interface.
I must admit I was a bit lazy with incremental builds until Peter
pressed me for it, and I must say it wasn't _that_ hard to do, with a
fresh mind. I tried a bunch of touch&&make scenarios and they all
worked fine. It always helps to steal tricks from Autoconf's bag, since
QEMU's "./config.status --skip-meson" is basically the same as
Autoconf's "./config.status --recheck".
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-19 22:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-19 21:32 [PULL v7 000/151] Meson-based build system Paolo Bonzini
2020-08-19 21:59 ` Eric Blake
2020-08-19 22:08 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2020-08-20 10:33 ` Peter Maydell
2020-08-20 11:52 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-08-20 14:54 ` Peter Maydell
2020-08-20 16:02 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-08-20 16:10 ` Peter Maydell
2020-08-21 6:15 ` Howard Spoelstra
2020-08-21 10:58 ` Howard Spoelstra
2020-08-21 12:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-08-21 16:11 ` Howard Spoelstra
2020-08-21 16:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-08-24 16:18 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e020de7b-2ec6-c2ac-97f1-3da9d874fd45@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).