From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EX6Ax-0005GU-8h
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 19:08:23 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EX6Av-0005Fg-63
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 19:08:22 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EX6Au-0005FK-FF
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 19:08:20 -0500
Received: from [64.233.184.194] (helo=wproxy.gmail.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EX6Au-0005Fe-CW
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 19:08:20 -0500
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i34so2624wra
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 16:08:19 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <e1843770511011608r1106d13cg786a3b08f663113b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 19:08:19 -0500
From: Julien Lancien <calexicoz@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Bug report
In-Reply-To: <e1843770511011607m1cda6256o37102cf17cc75fea@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <e1843770511011548w26a3a3d2g32e47a24de4ab941@mail.gmail.com>
	<cd8ecdef0511011600y7260f308u1da5cc6421f9747a@mail.gmail.com>
	<e1843770511011607m1cda6256o37102cf17cc75fea@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 11/1/05, Karl Magdsick <kmagnum@gmail.com> wrote:
> gcc 4.x is known not to compile qemu, due to a register allocation bug in=
 gcc.
>
> Also, the current qemu code generator is an ugly hack that relies on some
> specifics of gcc 3.x function implementation.  There is work being done
> on a _real_ code generator for qemu.

I saw that there is a binary distribution for linux-i386, however,
I'ld like to also get kqemu. Is there a way to do that without getting
gcc 3 ?

Thanks.

Ps: this is a forward, I forgot to copy the ml.