Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] s390x: improve subchannel error handling (vfio)

[Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>]

On 7/5/21 12:39 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> This is a followup on the first version (which I had sent out in May,
> and which kind of fell through the cracks.) While the first patch
> is mostly unchanged, I added a second patch to address some possible
> problems with the generated unit exceptions; non-vfio subchannels
> are not affected by this.
> 
> As before, this works on the good path, and I have not managed to
> actually get my system to exercise the error path :(

Sorry for the silence, was out of office for a bit and Eric is 
unavailable -- Anyway the code LGTM and matches what I see in the POPs, 
I'd be willing to ACK but I'd feel better if we could exercise the error 
paths before merging.

@Jared/@Mike, you've both had eyes on this area of code recently, would 
one of you be willing to take a crack at a tested-by (non-zero CCs on 
HSCH/CSCH + also drive the sch_gen_unit_exception path)?

> 
> v1->v2:
> - add comments regarding -ENODEV/-EACCES handling
> - add second patch
> 
> Cornelia Huck (2):
>    vfio-ccw: forward halt/clear errors
>    css: fix actl handling for unit exceptions
> 
>   hw/s390x/css.c         | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>   hw/vfio/ccw.c          |  4 ++--
>   include/hw/s390x/css.h |  3 ++-
>   3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>