From: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
To: "Max Reitz" <mreitz@redhat.com>, "Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
"Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iotests: Do not run the iotests during "make check" anymore
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2019 19:51:19 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e2463f58-f5f0-7391-0e70-bc2f9970bdfa@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1bf47905-9237-eff6-9a3e-d1693a3d597a@redhat.com>
On 10/2/19 11:50 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 02.10.19 17:10, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 02/10/2019 17.03, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 04:21:46PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>>> Running the iotests during "make check" is causing more headaches than
>>>> benefits for the block layer maintainers, so let's disable the iotests
>>>> during "make check" again.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> tests/Makefile.include | 2 +-
>>>> tests/qemu-iotests/group | 2 +-
>>>> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> I don't have any objection to removing from 'make check', but I feel
>>> like this commit should be modifying the travis.yml config so that
>>> it explicitly runs the block tests, otherwise we're loosing automated
>>> CI and the block tests will increase their rate of bitrot again.
>>
>> I was planning to send a separate patch for that (once my Travis builds
>> are through...), but if it is preferred, I can also send a v2 of this
>> patch here where I include that change.
>>
>> Max, any preferences?
>
> I don’t mind either way. I don’t think we’re in danger of you
> forgetting to send the Travis patch.
>
> As for running the tests on macOS: Good question. I’d just let them run
> now and maybe see later whether that decision hurts. macOS has its own
> filesystem, so it may be worth testing there.
>
> Max
>
There are absolutely known bugs and problems using APFS that we have not
fixed.
--js
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-02 23:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-02 14:21 [PATCH] iotests: Do not run the iotests during "make check" anymore Thomas Huth
2019-10-02 14:39 ` Max Reitz
2019-10-02 15:03 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-10-02 15:10 ` Thomas Huth
2019-10-02 15:50 ` Max Reitz
2019-10-02 23:51 ` John Snow [this message]
2019-10-07 13:03 ` Max Reitz
2019-10-07 19:10 ` John Snow
2019-10-02 17:32 ` Alex Bennée
2019-10-02 17:46 ` Thomas Huth
2019-10-07 10:00 ` Max Reitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e2463f58-f5f0-7391-0e70-bc2f9970bdfa@redhat.com \
--to=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).