qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
	qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Jason J . Herne" <jjherne@linux.ibm.com>,
	Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-5.2 v2 3/9] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Introduce ENODEV define and remove guards of others
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2020 15:27:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e279b0f7-daf7-8a9e-3009-a1677637ce90@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200806105349.632-4-thuth@redhat.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1210 bytes --]

On 8/6/20 12:53 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> Remove the "#ifndef E..." guards from the defines here - the header
> guard S390_CCW_H at the top of the file should avoid double definition,
> and if the error code is defined in a different file already, we're in
> trouble anyway, then it's better to see the error at compile time instead
> of hunting weird behavior during runtime later.
> Also define ENODEV - we will use this in a later patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>

Would it make sense to use the errno.h numbers for the defines?

Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>

> ---
>  pc-bios/s390-ccw/s390-ccw.h | 6 ++----
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/s390-ccw.h b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/s390-ccw.h
> index 36b884cced..dbc4c64851 100644
> --- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/s390-ccw.h
> +++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/s390-ccw.h
> @@ -27,12 +27,10 @@ typedef unsigned long long __u64;
>  #define false 0
>  #define PAGE_SIZE 4096
>  
> -#ifndef EIO
>  #define EIO     1
> -#endif
> -#ifndef EBUSY
>  #define EBUSY   2
> -#endif
> +#define ENODEV  3
> +
>  #ifndef NULL
>  #define NULL    0
>  #endif
> 



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-08-06 13:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-06 10:53 [PATCH for-5.2 v2 0/9] Continue booting in case the first device is not bootable Thomas Huth
2020-08-06 10:53 ` [PATCH for-5.2 v2 1/9] pc-bios/s390-ccw/Makefile: Compile with -std=gnu99, -fwrapv and -fno-common Thomas Huth
2020-08-06 10:53 ` [PATCH for-5.2 v2 2/9] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Move ipl-related code from main() into a separate function Thomas Huth
2020-08-06 10:53 ` [PATCH for-5.2 v2 3/9] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Introduce ENODEV define and remove guards of others Thomas Huth
2020-08-06 11:06   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-08-06 13:27   ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2020-08-27  9:10     ` Thomas Huth
2020-08-06 10:53 ` [PATCH for-5.2 v2 4/9] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Move the inner logic of find_subch() to a separate function Thomas Huth
2020-08-06 11:14   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-08-06 13:28   ` Janosch Frank
2020-08-06 10:53 ` [PATCH for-5.2 v2 5/9] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Do not bail out early if not finding a SCSI disk Thomas Huth
2020-08-06 11:20   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-08-06 10:53 ` [PATCH for-5.2 v2 6/9] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Scan through all devices if no boot device specified Thomas Huth
2020-08-06 10:53 ` [PATCH for-5.2 v2 7/9] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Allow booting in case the first virtio-blk disk is bad Thomas Huth
2020-08-06 10:53 ` [PATCH for-5.2 v2 8/9] pc-bios/s390-ccw/main: Remove superfluous call to enable_subchannel() Thomas Huth
2020-08-06 11:21   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-08-06 10:53 ` [PATCH for-5.2 v2 9/9] tests/qtest/cdrom: Add more s390x-related boot tests Thomas Huth
2020-08-06 11:23   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-08-06 11:58     ` Thomas Huth
2020-08-06 13:11       ` Cornelia Huck
2020-08-06 13:34   ` Janosch Frank

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e279b0f7-daf7-8a9e-3009-a1677637ce90@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=walling@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).