From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, philmd@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
mst@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-5.0 7/8] acpi: cpuhp: add CPHP_GET_CPU_ID_CMD command
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2019 16:46:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e3752033-f407-aab2-61b3-a304b15a4e6e@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191206161540.1664aace@redhat.com>
On 12/06/19 16:15, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Dec 2019 14:03:01 +0100
> Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On 12/04/19 18:05, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>>> Extend CPU hotplug interface to return architecture specific
>>> identifier for current CPU in 2 registers:
>>> - lower 32 bits existing ACPI_CPU_CMD_DATA_OFFSET_RW
>>> - upper 32 bits in new ACPI_CPU_CMD_DATA2_OFFSET_R at
>>> offset 0.
>>
>> OK.
>>
>>> Target user is UEFI firmware, which needs a way to enumerate
>>> all CPUs (including possible CPUs) to allocate and initialize
>>> CPU structures on boot.
>>
>> (1) This is correct in general, but if we want to keep this description,
>> then it should be moved to the commit message of the previous patch.
>> CPHP_GET_CPU_ID_CMD is not needed for the purpose described above -- it
>> will be necessary for handling the hotplug SMI.
>>
>> For the boot time allocation / initialization, the "enumerating present
>> and possible CPUs" workflow is necessary, and that is documented in the
>> previous patch in this series.
>>
>> So if we want to keep this paragraph, we should move it to the previous
>> patch's commit message.
>>
>>> (for x86: it needs APIC ID and later command will be used to
>>> retrieve ARM's MPIDR which serves the similar to APIC ID purpose)
>>
>> (2) I would suggest some punctuation, to make this clearer. How about:
>>
>>> On x86, guest UEFI firmware will use CPHP_GET_CPU_ID_CMD for fetching
>>> the APIC ID when handling the hotplug SMI.
>>>
>>> Later, CPHP_GET_CPU_ID_CMD will be used on ARM to retrieve MPIDR,
>>> which serves a purpose similar to the x86 APIC ID.
>
> How about following commit message:
>
> Firmware can enumerate present at boot APs by broadcasting wakeup IPI,
> so that woken up secondary CPUs could register them-selves.
> However in CPU hotplug case, it would need to know architecture
> specific CPU IDs for possible and hotplugged CPUs so it could
> prepare enviroment for and wake hotplugged AP.
>
> Reuse and extend existing CPU hotplug interface to return architecture
> specific ID for currently selected CPU in 2 registers:
> - lower 32 bits in ACPI_CPU_CMD_DATA_OFFSET_RW
> - upper 32 bits in ACPI_CPU_CMD_DATA2_OFFSET_R
>
> On x86, firmware will use CPHP_GET_CPU_ID_CMD for fetching the APIC ID
> when handling hotplug SMI.
>
> Later, CPHP_GET_CPU_ID_CMD will be used on ARM to retrieve MPIDR,
> which serves the similar to APIC ID purpose.
>
> [...]
>
Looks fine to me, thank you!
Laszlo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-06 17:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-04 17:05 [PATCH for-5.0 0/8] q35: CPU hotplug with secure boot, part 1+2 Igor Mammedov
2019-12-04 17:05 ` [PATCH for-5.0 1/8] q35: implement 128K SMRAM at default SMBASE address Igor Mammedov
2019-12-05 10:43 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-12-04 17:05 ` [PATCH for-5.0 2/8] tests: q35: MCH: add default SMBASE SMRAM lock test Igor Mammedov
2019-12-04 17:05 ` [PATCH for-5.0 3/8] acpi: cpuhp: spec: clarify 'CPU selector' register usage and endianness Igor Mammedov
2019-12-05 11:50 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-12-04 17:05 ` [PATCH for-5.0 4/8] acpi: cpuhp: spec: fix 'Command data' description Igor Mammedov
2019-12-05 12:17 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-12-06 11:09 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-12-06 12:00 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-12-04 17:05 ` [PATCH for-5.0 5/8] acpi: cpuhp: spec: clarify store into 'Command data' when 'Command field' == 0 Igor Mammedov
2019-12-05 12:21 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-12-04 17:05 ` [PATCH for-5.0 6/8] acpi: cpuhp: spec: add typical usecases Igor Mammedov
2019-12-05 12:29 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-12-04 17:05 ` [PATCH for-5.0 7/8] acpi: cpuhp: add CPHP_GET_CPU_ID_CMD command Igor Mammedov
2019-12-05 13:03 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-12-06 15:15 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-12-06 15:46 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2019-12-04 17:05 ` [PATCH for-5.0 8/8] acpi: cpuhp: spec: document procedure for enabling modern CPU hotplug Igor Mammedov
2019-12-05 14:07 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-12-06 10:40 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-12-06 12:02 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-12-06 13:49 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-12-06 15:06 ` Laszlo Ersek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e3752033-f407-aab2-61b3-a304b15a4e6e@redhat.com \
--to=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).