* [PATCH] hax: Windows doesn't like posix device names
@ 2020-03-22 21:02 Volker Rümelin
2020-03-23 8:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Volker Rümelin @ 2020-03-22 21:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Bonzini, Wenchao Wang, Colin Xu; +Cc: Julio Faracco, QEMU
Patch acb9f95a7c "i386: Fix GCC warning with snprintf when HAX
is enabled" replaced Windows device names with posix device
names. Revert this.
Fixes: acb9f95a7c "i386: Fix GCC warning with snprintf when HAX is enabled"
Signed-off-by: Volker Rümelin <vr_qemu@t-online.de>
---
target/i386/hax-windows.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/i386/hax-windows.c b/target/i386/hax-windows.c
index 0ba488c468..863c2bcc19 100644
--- a/target/i386/hax-windows.c
+++ b/target/i386/hax-windows.c
@@ -185,12 +185,12 @@ int hax_mod_version(struct hax_state *hax, struct hax_module_version *version)
static char *hax_vm_devfs_string(int vm_id)
{
- return g_strdup_printf("/dev/hax_vm/vm%02d", vm_id);
+ return g_strdup_printf("\\\\.\\hax_vm%02d", vm_id);
}
static char *hax_vcpu_devfs_string(int vm_id, int vcpu_id)
{
- return g_strdup_printf("/dev/hax_vm%02d/vcpu%02d", vm_id, vcpu_id);
+ return g_strdup_printf("\\\\.\\hax_vm%02d_vcpu%02d", vm_id, vcpu_id);
}
int hax_host_create_vm(struct hax_state *hax, int *vmid)
--
2.16.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] hax: Windows doesn't like posix device names
2020-03-22 21:02 [PATCH] hax: Windows doesn't like posix device names Volker Rümelin
@ 2020-03-23 8:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-04-09 13:24 ` Stefan Weil
2020-04-13 18:17 ` Volker Rümelin
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2020-03-23 8:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Volker Rümelin, Wenchao Wang, Colin Xu; +Cc: Julio Faracco, QEMU
On 22/03/20 22:02, Volker Rümelin wrote:
> Patch acb9f95a7c "i386: Fix GCC warning with snprintf when HAX
> is enabled" replaced Windows device names with posix device
> names. Revert this.
>
> Fixes: acb9f95a7c "i386: Fix GCC warning with snprintf when HAX is enabled"
>
> Signed-off-by: Volker Rümelin <vr_qemu@t-online.de>
> ---
> target/i386/hax-windows.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/i386/hax-windows.c b/target/i386/hax-windows.c
> index 0ba488c468..863c2bcc19 100644
> --- a/target/i386/hax-windows.c
> +++ b/target/i386/hax-windows.c
> @@ -185,12 +185,12 @@ int hax_mod_version(struct hax_state *hax, struct hax_module_version *version)
>
> static char *hax_vm_devfs_string(int vm_id)
> {
> - return g_strdup_printf("/dev/hax_vm/vm%02d", vm_id);
> + return g_strdup_printf("\\\\.\\hax_vm%02d", vm_id);
> }
>
> static char *hax_vcpu_devfs_string(int vm_id, int vcpu_id)
> {
> - return g_strdup_printf("/dev/hax_vm%02d/vcpu%02d", vm_id, vcpu_id);
> + return g_strdup_printf("\\\\.\\hax_vm%02d_vcpu%02d", vm_id, vcpu_id);
> }
>
> int hax_host_create_vm(struct hax_state *hax, int *vmid)
>
Queued, thanks.
Paolo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] hax: Windows doesn't like posix device names
2020-03-23 8:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
@ 2020-04-09 13:24 ` Stefan Weil
2020-04-09 13:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-04-10 9:21 ` Volker Rümelin
2020-04-13 18:17 ` Volker Rümelin
1 sibling, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Weil @ 2020-04-09 13:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Bonzini, Volker Rümelin, Wenchao Wang, Colin Xu
Cc: Julio Faracco, QEMU
Am 23.03.20 um 09:20 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> On 22/03/20 22:02, Volker Rümelin wrote:
>> Patch acb9f95a7c "i386: Fix GCC warning with snprintf when HAX
>> is enabled" replaced Windows device names with posix device
>> names. Revert this.
>>
>> Fixes: acb9f95a7c "i386: Fix GCC warning with snprintf when HAX is enabled"
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Volker Rümelin <vr_qemu@t-online.de>
>> ---
>> target/i386/hax-windows.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/target/i386/hax-windows.c b/target/i386/hax-windows.c
>> index 0ba488c468..863c2bcc19 100644
>> --- a/target/i386/hax-windows.c
>> +++ b/target/i386/hax-windows.c
>> @@ -185,12 +185,12 @@ int hax_mod_version(struct hax_state *hax, struct hax_module_version *version)
>>
>> static char *hax_vm_devfs_string(int vm_id)
>> {
>> - return g_strdup_printf("/dev/hax_vm/vm%02d", vm_id);
>> + return g_strdup_printf("\\\\.\\hax_vm%02d", vm_id);
>> }
>>
>> static char *hax_vcpu_devfs_string(int vm_id, int vcpu_id)
>> {
>> - return g_strdup_printf("/dev/hax_vm%02d/vcpu%02d", vm_id, vcpu_id);
>> + return g_strdup_printf("\\\\.\\hax_vm%02d_vcpu%02d", vm_id, vcpu_id);
>> }
>>
>> int hax_host_create_vm(struct hax_state *hax, int *vmid)
>>
> Queued, thanks.
>
> Paolo
I am rather sure that macOS does not like Windows device names, so just
reverting might be the wrong solution if HAX should work on Windows and
on macOS.
Is this relevant? Or should we drop HAX support for Windows? Personally
I have no experience with hardware acceleration for QEMU on macOS.
Stefan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] hax: Windows doesn't like posix device names
2020-04-09 13:24 ` Stefan Weil
@ 2020-04-09 13:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-04-10 9:21 ` Volker Rümelin
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2020-04-09 13:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Weil, Volker Rümelin, Wenchao Wang, Colin Xu
Cc: Julio Faracco, QEMU
On 09/04/20 15:24, Stefan Weil wrote:
>>> diff --git a/target/i386/hax-windows.c b/target/i386/hax-windows.c
>>> index 0ba488c468..863c2bcc19 100644
>>> --- a/target/i386/hax-windows.c
>>> +++ b/target/i386/hax-windows.c
>>> @@ -185,12 +185,12 @@ int hax_mod_version(struct hax_state *hax, struct hax_module_version *version)
>>>
>>> static char *hax_vm_devfs_string(int vm_id)
>>> {
>>> - return g_strdup_printf("/dev/hax_vm/vm%02d", vm_id);
>>> + return g_strdup_printf("\\\\.\\hax_vm%02d", vm_id);
>>> }
>>>
>>> static char *hax_vcpu_devfs_string(int vm_id, int vcpu_id)
>>> {
>>> - return g_strdup_printf("/dev/hax_vm%02d/vcpu%02d", vm_id, vcpu_id);
>>> + return g_strdup_printf("\\\\.\\hax_vm%02d_vcpu%02d", vm_id, vcpu_id);
>>> }
>>>
>>> int hax_host_create_vm(struct hax_state *hax, int *vmid)
>>>
>> Queued, thanks.
>>
>> Paolo
>
> I am rather sure that macOS does not like Windows device names, so just
> reverting might be the wrong solution if HAX should work on Windows and
> on macOS.
This is hax-windows.c, macOS uses hax-posix.c. These days
Hypervisor.framework is probably a better choice than HAX on macOS, but
IIUC hax-posix.c also supports NetBSD so we're keeping it.
Paolo
> Is this relevant? Or should we drop HAX support for Windows? Personally
> I have no experience with hardware acceleration for QEMU on macOS.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] hax: Windows doesn't like posix device names
2020-04-09 13:24 ` Stefan Weil
2020-04-09 13:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
@ 2020-04-10 9:21 ` Volker Rümelin
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Volker Rümelin @ 2020-04-10 9:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Weil, Paolo Bonzini, Wenchao Wang, Colin Xu; +Cc: Julio Faracco, QEMU
> Is this relevant? Or should we drop HAX support for Windows? Personally
> I have no experience with hardware acceleration for QEMU on macOS.
There's another reason to keep hax for Windows. You can't enable the Hyper-V role on Windows 10 Home. Without hax and whpx there's no usable hypervisor left.
With best regards,
Volker
> Stefan
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] hax: Windows doesn't like posix device names
2020-03-23 8:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-04-09 13:24 ` Stefan Weil
@ 2020-04-13 18:17 ` Volker Rümelin
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Volker Rümelin @ 2020-04-13 18:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Bonzini; +Cc: QEMU
> On 22/03/20 22:02, Volker Rümelin wrote:
>> Patch acb9f95a7c "i386: Fix GCC warning with snprintf when HAX
>> is enabled" replaced Windows device names with posix device
>> names. Revert this.
>>
>> Fixes: acb9f95a7c "i386: Fix GCC warning with snprintf when HAX is enabled"
>> Queued, thanks.
>>
>> Paolo
>>
Hi Paolo,
I would like to remind you that without this patch qemu 5.0 on Windows will not work with HAX. There is already a bug report at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871250
With best regards,
Volker
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-04-13 18:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-03-22 21:02 [PATCH] hax: Windows doesn't like posix device names Volker Rümelin
2020-03-23 8:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-04-09 13:24 ` Stefan Weil
2020-04-09 13:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-04-10 9:21 ` Volker Rümelin
2020-04-13 18:17 ` Volker Rümelin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).