From: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
To: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.m.mail@gmail.com>
Cc: "Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
"Aleksandar Markovic" <amarkovic@wavecomp.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL v3 47/55] linux headers: update against Linux 5.2-rc1
Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 14:58:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e3ce17c4-c1d6-20b4-0e7c-6c23e6a08e48@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e01100bc-50ee-5cc2-2802-a098acc720ac@vivier.eu>
On 5/23/19 2:30 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> On 23/05/2019 13:56, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>> On Wed, 22 May 2019 15:22:23 +0200
>> Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.m.mail@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The alternative way of invoking via IPCV6 (else part of “ifdef
>>> __NR_MSGSND”) should work for MIPS in the present stage of headers and
>>> kernel.
>>
>> I tried to do that so that we have at least a workaround for now; but
>> this fails building on my x86 laptop (the safe_syscall6 for ipc
>> complains about missing __NR_ipc). Maybe I'm holding it wrong (should
>> that be conditional on the host?), but I think that really needs to be
>> done by the mips maintainers...
>>
>
> Perhaps a simple workaround could be:
>
> diff --git a/linux-user/syscall.c b/linux-user/syscall.c
> index e311fcda0517..5b431736032c 100644
> --- a/linux-user/syscall.c
> +++ b/linux-user/syscall.c
> @@ -761,14 +761,8 @@ safe_syscall2(int, nanosleep, const struct timespec *, req,
> safe_syscall4(int, clock_nanosleep, const clockid_t, clock, int, flags,
> const struct timespec *, req, struct timespec *, rem)
> #endif
> -#ifdef __NR_msgsnd
> -safe_syscall4(int, msgsnd, int, msgid, const void *, msgp, size_t, sz,
> - int, flags)
> -safe_syscall5(int, msgrcv, int, msgid, void *, msgp, size_t, sz,
> - long, msgtype, int, flags)
> -safe_syscall4(int, semtimedop, int, semid, struct sembuf *, tsops,
> - unsigned, nsops, const struct timespec *, timeout)
> -#else
> +
> +#ifdef __NR_ipc
> /* This host kernel architecture uses a single ipc syscall; fake up
> * wrappers for the sub-operations to hide this implementation detail.
> * Annoyingly we can't include linux/ipc.h to get the constant definitions
> @@ -783,14 +777,30 @@ safe_syscall4(int, semtimedop, int, semid, struct sembuf *, tsops,
>
> safe_syscall6(int, ipc, int, call, long, first, long, second, long, third,
> void *, ptr, long, fifth)
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifdef __NR_msgsnd
> +safe_syscall4(int, msgsnd, int, msgid, const void *, msgp, size_t, sz,
> + int, flags)
> +#else
> static int safe_msgsnd(int msgid, const void *msgp, size_t sz, int flags)
> {
> return safe_ipc(Q_IPCCALL(0, Q_MSGSND), msgid, sz, flags, (void *)msgp, 0);
> }
> +#endif
> +#ifdef __NR_msgrcv
> +safe_syscall5(int, msgrcv, int, msgid, void *, msgp, size_t, sz,
> + long, msgtype, int, flags)
> +#else
> static int safe_msgrcv(int msgid, void *msgp, size_t sz, long type, int flags)
> {
> return safe_ipc(Q_IPCCALL(1, Q_MSGRCV), msgid, sz, flags, msgp, type);
> }
> +#endif
> +#ifdef __NR_semtimedop
> +safe_syscall4(int, semtimedop, int, semid, struct sembuf *, tsops,
> + unsigned, nsops, const struct timespec *, timeout)
> +#else
> static int safe_semtimedop(int semid, struct sembuf *tsops, unsigned nsops,
> const struct timespec *timeout)
> {
>
Works for me!
I have no idea if this is the proper fix, but this fix my test setup.
Can you send a proper patch?
Thanks :)
Phil.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-23 13:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-21 15:28 [Qemu-devel] [PULL v3 00/55] s390x update Cornelia Huck
2019-05-21 15:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL v3 46/55] update-linux-headers: handle new header file Cornelia Huck
2019-05-21 15:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL v3 47/55] linux headers: update against Linux 5.2-rc1 Cornelia Huck
2019-05-22 11:47 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-05-22 12:07 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-05-22 12:10 ` Laurent Vivier
2019-05-22 12:24 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-05-22 13:22 ` Aleksandar Markovic
2019-05-22 13:28 ` Aleksandar Markovic
2019-05-22 13:42 ` Alex Bennée
2019-05-22 13:50 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-05-23 21:15 ` Aleksandar Markovic
2019-05-23 11:56 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-05-23 12:30 ` Laurent Vivier
2019-05-23 12:58 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [this message]
2019-05-23 19:16 ` Alex Bennée
2019-05-23 19:18 ` Laurent Vivier
2019-05-22 13:33 ` Alex Bennée
2019-05-21 16:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL v3 00/55] s390x update Peter Maydell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-05-22 13:50 [Qemu-devel] [PULL v3 47/55] linux headers: update against Linux 5.2-rc1 Aleksandar Markovic
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e3ce17c4-c1d6-20b4-0e7c-6c23e6a08e48@redhat.com \
--to=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=aleksandar.m.mail@gmail.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=amarkovic@wavecomp.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=laurent@vivier.eu \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).