From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FboLv-0007DL-Nm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 May 2006 20:39:27 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FboLr-0007D1-9a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 May 2006 20:39:26 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FboLr-0007Cy-33 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 May 2006 20:39:23 -0400 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1FboLt-0008Sn-Oo for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 May 2006 20:39:25 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1FboLn-00010u-0o for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 05 May 2006 02:39:19 +0200 Received: from dslb-084-061-141-110.pools.arcor-ip.net ([84.61.141.110]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 05 May 2006 02:39:19 +0200 Received: from skoehler by dslb-084-061-141-110.pools.arcor-ip.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 05 May 2006 02:39:19 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sven_K=F6hler?= Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 02:39:12 +0200 Message-ID: References: <445A0480.7010001@cnpbagwell.com> <445A4520.9040300@bellard.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig5FDA457C1BBE0218091691B2" In-Reply-To: <445A4520.9040300@bellard.org> Sender: news Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: Unknown PCI Bridge Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig5FDA457C1BBE0218091691B2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Yes, ACPI adds a new PCI device so it is normal. I am interested by any= > regression found using the current CVS with ACPI... I think, this answer is fairly useless for the OP. So perhaps the OP wanted to ask: how do i tell my Win2k to properly use the new PCI device? I'm especially interested in this question: is qemu's current ACPI PCI device so normal, that it would be recognized and properly used by a newly installed Win2k? qemu's ACPI PCI device doesn't seem to be _that_ normal/known. At least a recent Knoppix lists it as "Bridge: Intel Corp.: Inknown device 7013". BTW: how can i test ACPI with Linux? At least "cat /proc/acpi/info" works fine and shows: version: 20050309 Greetings Sven --------------enig5FDA457C1BBE0218091691B2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEWp6w7Ww7FjRBE4ARAoqPAJ9X5LQDh/VZ0e3ZA3L44IJVTzCcMACg4jLF KaiDeFIuN3YpeuCV/FGlLNs= =3kgz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig5FDA457C1BBE0218091691B2--