From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50764) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fAgTC-0002AE-1v for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 14:45:46 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fAgT8-0002Ar-W4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 14:45:46 -0400 Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:39900 helo=mx1.redhat.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fAgT8-0002Ah-Rt for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 14:45:42 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6ADA3401DEB2 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 18:45:42 +0000 (UTC) References: <20180420231246.23130-1-lersek@redhat.com> <20180420231246.23130-2-lersek@redhat.com> <87tvs2ntar.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> From: Laszlo Ersek Message-ID: Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 20:45:35 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87tvs2ntar.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [qemu RFC v3 1/3] qapi: add SysEmuTarget to "common.json" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Markus Armbruster Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, libvir-list@redhat.com, Thomas Huth , Kashyap Chamarthy , Gerd Hoffmann , Paolo Bonzini , David Gibson On 04/23/18 11:52, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Laszlo Ersek writes: > >> We'll soon need an enumeration type that lists all the softmmu targets >> that QEMU (the project) supports. Introduce @SysEmuTarget to >> "common.json". >> >> Cc: "Daniel P. Berrange" >> Cc: David Gibson >> Cc: Eric Blake >> Cc: Gerd Hoffmann >> Cc: Kashyap Chamarthy >> Cc: Markus Armbruster >> Cc: Paolo Bonzini >> Cc: Thomas Huth >> Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek > > Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster > Thanks! I think I'll post a PATCH (not RFC) series next, with patches #1 and #2 from this set (addressing your comments for patch #2), and I'll try to add patch #3 for your earlier comments here: http://mid.mail-archive.com/87k1t1sujh.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org And we can keep the firmware.json RFC separate, and dependent on that set. Thanks! Laszlo