From: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
To: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com>, groug@kaod.org
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com,
mtosatti@redhat.com, joe.jin@oracle.com, zhenyuw@linux.intel.com,
lyan@digitalocean.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 1/2] target/i386/kvm: introduce 'pmu-cap-disabled' to set KVM_PMU_CAP_DISABLE
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2023 14:58:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e5c13490-00cb-61ba-1f8f-52421140b419@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA3+yLdbMwfBQ-3Ckk4zwLdbwNOQ8M28d2CqLP0+AKkDwC7Ynw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Like,
On 7/2/23 06:41, Like Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 9:39 AM Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@oracle.com> wrote:
>>
>> The "perf stat" at the VM side still works even we set "-cpu host,-pmu" in
>> the QEMU command line. That is, neither "-cpu host,-pmu" nor "-cpu EPYC"
>> could disable the pmu virtualization in an AMD environment.
>>
>> We still see below at VM kernel side ...
>>
>> [ 0.510611] Performance Events: Fam17h+ core perfctr, AMD PMU driver.
>>
>> ... although we expect something like below.
>>
>> [ 0.596381] Performance Events: PMU not available due to virtualization, using software events only.
>> [ 0.600972] NMI watchdog: Perf NMI watchdog permanently disabled
>>
>> This is because the AMD pmu (v1) does not rely on cpuid to decide if the
>> pmu virtualization is supported.
>>
>> We introduce a new property 'pmu-cap-disabled' for KVM accel to set
>> KVM_PMU_CAP_DISABLE if KVM_CAP_PMU_CAPABILITY is supported. Only x86 host
>> is supported because currently KVM uses KVM_CAP_PMU_CAPABILITY only for
>> x86.
>
> We may check cpu->enable_pmu when creating the first CPU or a BSP one
> (before it gets running) and then choose whether to disable guest pmu using
> vm ioctl KVM_CAP_PMU_CAPABILITY. Introducing a new property is not too
> acceptable if there are other options.
In the v1 of the implementation, we have implemented something similar: not
based on the cpu_index (or BSP), but to introduce a helper before creating the
KVM vcpu to let the further implementation decide. We did the
KVM_CAP_PMU_CAPABILITY in that helper once.
[PATCH 1/3] kvm: introduce a helper before creating the 1st vcpu
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221119122901.2469-2-dongli.zhang@oracle.com/
[PATCH 2/3] i386: kvm: disable KVM_CAP_PMU_CAPABILITY if "pmu" is disabled
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221119122901.2469-3-dongli.zhang@oracle.com/
The below was the suggestion from Greg Kurz about to use per-VCPU property to
control per-VM cap:
"It doesn't seem conceptually correct to configure VM level stuff out of
a vCPU property, which could theoretically be different for each vCPU,
even if this isn't the case with the current code base.
Maybe consider controlling PMU with a machine property and this
could be done in kvm_arch_init() like other VM level stuff ?"
Would you mind comment on that?
Thank you very much!
Dongli Zhang
>
>>
>> Cc: Joe Jin <joe.jin@oracle.com>
>> Cc: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
>> ---
>> Changed since v1:
>> - In version 1 we did not introduce the new property. We ioctl
>> KVM_PMU_CAP_DISABLE only before the creation of the 1st vcpu. We had
>> introduced a helpfer function to do this job before creating the 1st
>> KVM vcpu in v1.
>>
>> accel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 1 +
>> include/sysemu/kvm_int.h | 1 +
>> qemu-options.hx | 7 ++++++
>> target/i386/kvm/kvm.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 4 files changed, 55 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
>> index 7679f397ae..238098e991 100644
>> --- a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
>> +++ b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
>> @@ -3763,6 +3763,7 @@ static void kvm_accel_instance_init(Object *obj)
>> s->xen_version = 0;
>> s->xen_gnttab_max_frames = 64;
>> s->xen_evtchn_max_pirq = 256;
>> + s->pmu_cap_disabled = false;
>> }
>>
>> /**
>> diff --git a/include/sysemu/kvm_int.h b/include/sysemu/kvm_int.h
>> index 511b42bde5..cbbe08ec54 100644
>> --- a/include/sysemu/kvm_int.h
>> +++ b/include/sysemu/kvm_int.h
>> @@ -123,6 +123,7 @@ struct KVMState
>> uint32_t xen_caps;
>> uint16_t xen_gnttab_max_frames;
>> uint16_t xen_evtchn_max_pirq;
>> + bool pmu_cap_disabled;
>> };
>>
>> void kvm_memory_listener_register(KVMState *s, KVMMemoryListener *kml,
>> diff --git a/qemu-options.hx b/qemu-options.hx
>> index b57489d7ca..1976c0ca3e 100644
>> --- a/qemu-options.hx
>> +++ b/qemu-options.hx
>> @@ -187,6 +187,7 @@ DEF("accel", HAS_ARG, QEMU_OPTION_accel,
>> " tb-size=n (TCG translation block cache size)\n"
>> " dirty-ring-size=n (KVM dirty ring GFN count, default 0)\n"
>> " notify-vmexit=run|internal-error|disable,notify-window=n (enable notify VM exit and set notify window, x86 only)\n"
>> + " pmu-cap-disabled=true|false (disable KVM_CAP_PMU_CAPABILITY, x86 only, default false)\n"
>> " thread=single|multi (enable multi-threaded TCG)\n", QEMU_ARCH_ALL)
>> SRST
>> ``-accel name[,prop=value[,...]]``
>> @@ -254,6 +255,12 @@ SRST
>> open up for a specified of time (i.e. notify-window).
>> Default: notify-vmexit=run,notify-window=0.
>>
>> + ``pmu-cap-disabled=true|false``
>> + When the KVM accelerator is used, it controls whether to disable the
>> + KVM_CAP_PMU_CAPABILITY via KVM_PMU_CAP_DISABLE. When disabled, the
>> + PMU virtualization is disabled at the KVM module side. This is for
>> + x86 host only.
>> +
>> ERST
>>
>> DEF("smp", HAS_ARG, QEMU_OPTION_smp,
>> diff --git a/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c b/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c
>> index de531842f6..bf4136fa1b 100644
>> --- a/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c
>> +++ b/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c
>> @@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ static bool has_msr_ucode_rev;
>> static bool has_msr_vmx_procbased_ctls2;
>> static bool has_msr_perf_capabs;
>> static bool has_msr_pkrs;
>> +static bool has_pmu_cap;
>>
>> static uint32_t has_architectural_pmu_version;
>> static uint32_t num_architectural_pmu_gp_counters;
>> @@ -2767,6 +2768,23 @@ int kvm_arch_init(MachineState *ms, KVMState *s)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> + has_pmu_cap = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_PMU_CAPABILITY);
>> +
>> + if (s->pmu_cap_disabled) {
>> + if (has_pmu_cap) {
>> + ret = kvm_vm_enable_cap(s, KVM_CAP_PMU_CAPABILITY, 0,
>> + KVM_PMU_CAP_DISABLE);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + s->pmu_cap_disabled = false;
>> + error_report("kvm: Failed to disable pmu cap: %s",
>> + strerror(-ret));
>> + }
>> + } else {
>> + s->pmu_cap_disabled = false;
>> + error_report("kvm: KVM_CAP_PMU_CAPABILITY is not supported");
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -5951,6 +5969,28 @@ static void kvm_arch_set_xen_evtchn_max_pirq(Object *obj, Visitor *v,
>> s->xen_evtchn_max_pirq = value;
>> }
>>
>> +static void kvm_set_pmu_cap_disabled(Object *obj, Visitor *v,
>> + const char *name, void *opaque,
>> + Error **errp)
>> +{
>> + KVMState *s = KVM_STATE(obj);
>> + bool pmu_cap_disabled;
>> + Error *error = NULL;
>> +
>> + if (s->fd != -1) {
>> + error_setg(errp, "Cannot set properties after the accelerator has been initialized");
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + visit_type_bool(v, name, &pmu_cap_disabled, &error);
>> + if (error) {
>> + error_propagate(errp, error);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + s->pmu_cap_disabled = pmu_cap_disabled;
>> +}
>> +
>> void kvm_arch_accel_class_init(ObjectClass *oc)
>> {
>> object_class_property_add_enum(oc, "notify-vmexit", "NotifyVMexitOption",
>> @@ -5990,6 +6030,12 @@ void kvm_arch_accel_class_init(ObjectClass *oc)
>> NULL, NULL);
>> object_class_property_set_description(oc, "xen-evtchn-max-pirq",
>> "Maximum number of Xen PIRQs");
>> +
>> + object_class_property_add(oc, "pmu-cap-disabled", "bool",
>> + NULL, kvm_set_pmu_cap_disabled,
>> + NULL, NULL);
>> + object_class_property_set_description(oc, "pmu-cap-disabled",
>> + "Disable KVM_CAP_PMU_CAPABILITY");
>> }
>>
>> void kvm_set_max_apic_id(uint32_t max_apic_id)
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-03 22:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-21 1:38 [PATCH RESEND v2 0/2] target/i386/kvm: fix two svm pmu virtualization bugs Dongli Zhang
2023-06-21 1:38 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 1/2] target/i386/kvm: introduce 'pmu-cap-disabled' to set KVM_PMU_CAP_DISABLE Dongli Zhang
2023-07-02 13:41 ` Like Xu
2023-07-03 21:58 ` Dongli Zhang [this message]
2023-06-21 1:38 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 2/2] target/i386/kvm: get and put AMD pmu registers Dongli Zhang
2023-07-02 14:15 ` Like Xu
2023-07-03 23:20 ` Dongli Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e5c13490-00cb-61ba-1f8f-52421140b419@oracle.com \
--to=dongli.zhang@oracle.com \
--cc=groug@kaod.org \
--cc=joe.jin@oracle.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=like.xu.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=lyan@digitalocean.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=zhenyuw@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).