From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37965) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1epDTU-0003TP-4N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 08:33:20 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1epDTP-0003ZQ-88 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 08:33:20 -0500 References: <1519241752-28083-1-git-send-email-walling@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <3b160f2d-8c32-7b0a-3afc-0519c02cee81@de.ibm.com> <5fd04c0d-ad1e-13a7-4e5a-5f28662479a7@redhat.com> <68148fff-0c6e-0470-a0e5-0379ecfd3dd8@linux.vnet.ibm.com> From: Thomas Huth Message-ID: Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 14:33:10 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <68148fff-0c6e-0470-a0e5-0379ecfd3dd8@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 00/13] Interactive Boot Menu for DASD and SCSI Guests on s390x List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Viktor Mihajlovski , Christian Borntraeger , "Collin L. Walling" , qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com, cohuck@redhat.com, david@redhat.com, alifm@linux.vnet.ibm.com, eblake@redhat.com On 23.02.2018 12:50, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote: > On 23.02.2018 11:17, Thomas Huth wrote: >> On 23.02.2018 09:53, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >>> Hmmm, on my ubuntu 16.04 guest, I get the boot menu with no timeout even if I do not >>> specify loadparm or boot menu: >>> >>> qemu-kvm -drive file=/var/lib/libvirt/qemu/image.zhyp140,if=none,id=d1 -device virtio-blk-ccw,drive=d1,bootindex=1 >> >> I can reproduce this now, too. FWIW: It only happens with >> virtio-blk-ccw, not with virtio-scsi-ccw (that's why I did not notice it >> first). Collin, can you reproduce this, too? >> >> Thomas >> The idea is to support the zipl boot menu on ECKD disks (which have a timeout by themselves) > even without switching the boot menu on. This is to have the same behavior as one would see > on LPAR or z/VM. > The issue is that the boot code tries to interpret the program table of SCSI bootmaps as if > a boot menu has been specified. Ok, thanks for the explanation, makes sense now. Collin, could you please spin a v9 with the required changes included? Thanks, Thomas