From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5D56C4708F for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 16:10:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 438ED61623 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 16:10:55 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 438ED61623 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:55092 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1loTSI-0000qN-Ek for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 12:10:54 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58230) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1loTRT-0008Kx-Pa for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 12:10:03 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:27749) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1loTRP-0001ke-K4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 12:10:01 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1622650197; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=qZv/+RIYvFZtgKtAFQkFPVqR/oGPZdRqvjs0z3TykMA=; b=Yv70Qbd6Oky3FZPleZCf0FSgERP1Om9bzYTHQLOO8ywbrW1iq3qBjDYLFgeuRxBj2Nl6ue jDTqUuMpOqIQ5iaY4L972dPekNF1WnrQ5jyBNxL8Z9LDjQ9XW1j9CVvs3w56sew6lR9Is/ VPEL8T1xp6A94zHB4jEZ/moUDtunEmM= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-196-NbUTTDDqNsSM70gkxRaZNQ-1; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 12:09:53 -0400 X-MC-Unique: NbUTTDDqNsSM70gkxRaZNQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8D61107ACFE; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 16:09:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.10.116.137] (ovpn-116-137.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.116.137]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B6B860BE5; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 16:09:48 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] GitLab: Add "Bug" issue reporting template To: Stefan Hajnoczi References: <20210521173818.255817-1-jsnow@redhat.com> <20210521173818.255817-2-jsnow@redhat.com> From: John Snow Message-ID: Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 12:09:47 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=jsnow@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=jsnow@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -37 X-Spam_score: -3.8 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.371, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.613, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Maydell , Thomas Huth , Peter Krempa , =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_P=2e_Berrang=c3=a9?= , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini , =?UTF-8?Q?Alex_Benn=c3=a9e?= Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 6/2/21 5:22 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 01:38:17PM -0400, John Snow wrote: >> diff --git a/.gitlab/issue_templates/bug.md b/.gitlab/issue_templates/bug.md >> new file mode 100644 >> index 00000000000..67a02a3ffcf >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/.gitlab/issue_templates/bug.md >> @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ >> + >> + >> +## Host environment >> + - Operating system: (Windows 10 21H1, Fedora 34, etc.) >> + - OS/kernel version: (For POSIX hosts, use `uname -a`) >> + - Architecture: (x86, ARM, s390x, etc.) >> + - QEMU flavor: (qemu-system-x86_64, qemu-aarch64, qemu-img, etc.) > > Is this necessary since we ask for the command-line below? > Not strictly, IF the entire form is filled out. I had noticed some bugs in gitlab where reporters seem to be aware of what kind of QEMU they are running, but are unable to procure the command line invocation. (it is being launched through docker, virsh, etc.) * It's redundant, but I am operating on the belief that the CLI may not always be available. I don't expect people to not file a bug because they can't find it. I think of it as a prompt to get a more detailed report on the first try. Is it worth keeping? *(Aside: maybe a wiki "how to report a bug" page could have a small section on identifying the command line arguments when QEMU is being launched via vmm/boxes/virsh/docker and so on.) >> +