From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fq2jA-000580-Fh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 02:50:16 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fq2j7-00057f-2N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 02:50:15 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fq2j6-00057c-Ri for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 02:50:12 -0400 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1Fq2rz-0007ti-VB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 02:59:24 -0400 Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Fq2iv-0005gV-Vi for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 08:50:01 +0200 Received: from p5084b798.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([80.132.183.152]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 08:50:01 +0200 Received: from peter_remove_this_ by p5084b798.dip0.t-ipconnect.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 08:50:01 +0200 From: Peter =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Sch=FCtt?= Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit Sender: news Subject: [Qemu-devel] Windows 98 as guest under 0.81 and Kqemu 1.3Beta Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 06:50:16 -0000 To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hallo, now I am using 0.80 and Kqemu 0.7 (? the previous Version) under Linux Debian Testing/Unstable (2.6.15) with Windows 98SE as guest systems. Everything works fine and the accelerator give me enough speed. Do I have any advantages when I upgrade to the current version? Does the current version (incl. accelerator) works fine with Windows 98 as guest? Thanks for Help. Ciao Peter Schütt