From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FrklX-0003T4-DD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 17 Jun 2006 20:03:47 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FrklV-0003Oc-KJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 17 Jun 2006 20:03:46 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FrklV-0003OH-Aq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 17 Jun 2006 20:03:45 -0400 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1FrkvS-0000Mm-5e for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 17 Jun 2006 20:14:02 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1FrklM-000553-KE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 02:03:36 +0200 Received: from pool-71-245-101-142.ptldor.fios.verizon.net ([71.245.101.142]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 02:03:36 +0200 Received: from void by pool-71-245-101-142.ptldor.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 02:03:36 +0200 From: "Alex" Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2006 17:03:46 -0700 Message-ID: References: <200606131046.40921.jseward@acm.org> <200606171203.38845.rickv@hobi.com> <200606171824.23986.jseward@acm.org> Sender: news Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: Re: "invisible wall" patch Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org I have not updated my sources this week. But in the past few months I had to manually apply the patch to make Qemu workable. And I use it a lot. Thanks for a great product. -- Alex. "Julian Seward" wrote in message news:200606171824.23986.jseward@acm.org... > On Saturday 17 June 2006 18:03, Rick Vernam wrote: >> On Saturday 17 June 2006 11:32, Alex wrote: >> > This patch has been around for a while but never committed to the >> > mainstream. > > Huh? Fabrice committed it some time around Tuesday. I've been > using it 8+ hours/day since then and it seems fine to me. > > J