From: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
To: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-arm@nongnu.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, david@redhat.com,
balaton@eik.bme.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] target/arm: Fix unwind from dc zva and FEAT_MOPS
Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2024 19:24:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e78b2024e22769c4d2cc3203ccfe5748d2e409e5.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <426dbf1d-cfa8-4fd4-b857-8b8a283dd55e@linaro.org>
On Thu, 2024-07-04 at 14:48 -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 7/4/24 08:18, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > On 7/4/24 07:50, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2024-07-02 at 16:41 -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > > > While looking into Zoltan's attempt to speed up ppc64 DCBZ
> > > > (data cache block set to zero), I wondered what AArch64 was
> > > > doing differently. It turned out that Arm is the only user
> > > > of tlb_vaddr_to_host.
> > > >
> > > > None of the code sequences in use between AArch64, Power64 and
> > > > S390X
> > > > are 100% safe, with race conditions vs mmap et al, however,
> > > > AArch64
> > > > is the only one that will fail this single threaded test case.
> > > > Use
> > > > of these new functions fixes the race condition as well, though
> > > > I
> > > > have not yet touched the other guests.
> > > >
> > > > I thought about exposing accel/tcg/user-retaddr.h for direct
> > > > use
> > > > from the targets, but perhaps these wrappers are cleaner. RFC?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > r~
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Richard Henderson (2):
> > > > accel/tcg: Introduce memset_ra, memmove_ra
> > > > target/arm: Use memset_ra, memmove_ra in helper-a64.c
> > > >
> > > > include/exec/cpu_ldst.h | 40 ++++++++++++++++
> > > > accel/tcg/user-exec.c | 22 +++++++++
> > > > target/arm/tcg/helper-a64.c | 10 ++--
> > > > tests/tcg/multiarch/memset-fault.c | 77
> > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > 4 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > > create mode 100644 tests/tcg/multiarch/memset-fault.c
> > >
> > > This sounds good to me.
> > >
> > > I haven't debugged it, but I wonder why doesn't s390x fail here.
> > > For XC with src == dst, it does access_memset() ->
> > > do_access_memset()
> > > -> memset() without setting the RA. And I don't think that
> > > anything
> > > around it sets the RA either.
> >
> > s390x uses probe_access_flags, which verifies the page is mapped
> > and writable, and raises
> > the exception when it isn't. In contrast, for user-only,
> > tlb_vaddr_to_host *only*
> > performs the guest -> host address mapping, i.e. (addr +
> > guest_base).
>
> I should clarify: probe_access_flags verifies that the page is mapped
> *at that moment*,
> but does not take the mmap_lock. So the race is that the page can be
> unmapped by another
> thread after probe_access_flags and before the memset completes.
I see, thanks. I completely overlooked the access_prepare() calls.
Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-05 17:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-02 23:41 [PATCH 0/2] target/arm: Fix unwind from dc zva and FEAT_MOPS Richard Henderson
2024-07-02 23:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] accel/tcg: Introduce memset_ra, memmove_ra Richard Henderson
2024-07-08 14:31 ` Peter Maydell
2024-07-02 23:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] target/arm: Use memset_ra, memmove_ra in helper-a64.c Richard Henderson
2024-07-08 14:33 ` Peter Maydell
2024-07-04 14:50 ` [PATCH 0/2] target/arm: Fix unwind from dc zva and FEAT_MOPS Ilya Leoshkevich
2024-07-04 15:18 ` Richard Henderson
2024-07-04 21:48 ` Richard Henderson
2024-07-05 17:24 ` Ilya Leoshkevich [this message]
2024-07-08 14:25 ` Peter Maydell
2024-07-09 16:17 ` Richard Henderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e78b2024e22769c4d2cc3203ccfe5748d2e409e5.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=balaton@eik.bme.hu \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).