From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Da8Cq-0004CN-1t for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 May 2005 04:22:40 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Da8Cm-0004Aa-AP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 May 2005 04:22:32 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Da8Bu-0003k7-UF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 May 2005 04:21:39 -0400 Received: from [64.233.170.202] (helo=rproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Da84O-0002bf-18 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 May 2005 04:13:52 -0400 Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id j1so1196416rnf for ; Mon, 23 May 2005 01:04:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 10:04:27 +0200 From: Pascal Terjan Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: [Qemu-devel] snapshots Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org hello, qemu has -loadvm and -snapshot but I don't like having to take care of using the right vm dump with the snapshot, and having to think to savevm to the right file when I commit the disk. What do you think of snapshot/commit (or an additionnal equivalent command) working with full state ?