From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GHU79-0000iu-Ed for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 27 Aug 2006 19:32:27 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GHU78-0000ii-07 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 27 Aug 2006 19:32:27 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GHU77-0000if-Tu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 27 Aug 2006 19:32:25 -0400 Received: from [64.233.166.177] (helo=py-out-1112.google.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GHUFx-0003a3-8E for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 27 Aug 2006 19:41:33 -0400 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id x31so2029644pye for ; Sun, 27 Aug 2006 16:32:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 01:32:23 +0200 From: "Pascal Terjan" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] cdrom hardcoded index In-Reply-To: <200608242131.3231@centrum.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200608242131.3231@centrum.cz> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 8/24/06, drtyc@centrum.cz wrote: > Hello. > > How about finally not having cdrom hardcoded? [...] > not speaking about more then one images as cdrom What about something like -hdX test.iso,hw=cdrom with default hw being disk ?