From: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
To: Ashijeet Acharya <ashijeetacharya@gmail.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>, Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>,
Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>,
QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Peter Wu <peter@lekensteyn.nl>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] DMG chunk size independence
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 17:19:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e91d0cfe-407a-ab3b-ee9a-e32d570668a4@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAC2QTZbz1isnu-SKRoe8PcEfzV5Yz5Rf82_7zTXqvEKB7NUJJQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 04/23/2017 05:03 AM, Ashijeet Acharya wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Great news!
> I have almost completed this task and the results are looking
> promising. I have not yet attended to the DMG files having bz2
> compressed chunks but that should be easy and pretty similar to my
> approach for zlib compressed files. So, no worries there.
>
> For testing I am first converting the images to raw format and then
> comparing the resulting image with the one converted using v2.9.0 DMG
> driver and after battling for 2 days with my code, it finally prints
> "Images are identical." According to John, that should be pretty
> conclusive and I completely agree.
>
Yes, comparing a sample.dmg against a raw file generated from the 2.9.0
qemu-img tool should be reasonably good evidence that you have not
altered the behavior of the tool.
> Now, the real thing I wanted to ask was, if someone is aware of a DMG
> file which has a chunk size above 64 MiB so that I can test those too.
> If yes, please share the download link with me.
> Currently I am testing the ones posted by Peter Wu while submitting
> his DMG work in 2014.
> Here -> https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-12/msg03606.html
>
Are any of those over 64MB? I assume you're implying that they aren't.
Maybe Peter knows?...
> Expect v1 soon...
>
> Ashijeet
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-24 21:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-15 8:38 [Qemu-devel] DMG chunk size independence Ashijeet Acharya
2017-04-17 20:29 ` John Snow
2017-04-18 10:21 ` Ashijeet Acharya
2017-04-18 17:05 ` John Snow
2017-04-18 17:43 ` Ashijeet Acharya
2017-04-23 9:03 ` Ashijeet Acharya
2017-04-24 21:19 ` John Snow [this message]
2017-04-25 5:20 ` Ashijeet Acharya
2017-04-25 9:50 ` Peter Wu
2017-04-18 10:29 ` Kevin Wolf
2017-04-25 10:48 ` Ashijeet Acharya
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e91d0cfe-407a-ab3b-ee9a-e32d570668a4@redhat.com \
--to=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=ashijeetacharya@gmail.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=peter@lekensteyn.nl \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).