From: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
peter.maydell@linaro.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org,
meyering@redhat.com, Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>,
Liu Yuan <namei.unix@gmail.com>,
MORITA Kazutaka <morita.kazutaka@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] sheepdog build warning
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 11:14:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e932f9c2-2466-9063-d441-6de9076ac525@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181217231145-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Hi Michael,
On 12/18/18 5:16 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 11:03:11PM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> mingw32 build on fedora fails with this warning:
>>
>> /scm/qemu/block/sheepdog.c: In function 'find_vdi_name':
>> /scm/qemu/block/sheepdog.c:1239:5: error: 'strncpy' specified bound 256 equals destination size [-Werror=stringop-truncation]
>> strncpy(buf + SD_MAX_VDI_LEN, tag, SD_MAX_VDI_TAG_LEN);
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
>> make: *** [/scm/qemu/rules.mak:69: block/sheepdog.o] Error 1
>> make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>>
>>
>> Reading the code one sees it's working as intended:
>>
>>
>> static int find_vdi_name(BDRVSheepdogState *s, const char *filename,
>> uint32_t snapid, const char *tag, uint32_t *vid,
>> bool lock, Error **errp)
>> {
>> int ret, fd;
>> SheepdogVdiReq hdr;
>> SheepdogVdiRsp *rsp = (SheepdogVdiRsp *)&hdr;
>> unsigned int wlen, rlen = 0;
>> char buf[SD_MAX_VDI_LEN + SD_MAX_VDI_TAG_LEN];
>>
>> fd = connect_to_sdog(s, errp);
>> if (fd < 0) {
>> return fd;
>> }
>>
>> /* This pair of strncpy calls ensures that the buffer is zero-filled,
>> * which is desirable since we'll soon be sending those bytes, and
>> * don't want the send_req to read uninitialized data.
>> */
>> strncpy(buf, filename, SD_MAX_VDI_LEN);
>> strncpy(buf + SD_MAX_VDI_LEN, tag, SD_MAX_VDI_TAG_LEN);
>>
>>
>> .....
>>
>> }
>>
>>
>>
>> so this seems to be the case of GCC developers deciding that
>> strncpy is simply a bad API and a correct use of it should be
>> warned against.
>>
>> I propose either
>>
>> 1. simply adding
>>
>> #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wstringop-truncation"
>>
>> in osdep.
>>
>> 2. adding an inline wrapper with said pragma in there.
>>
>> 3. -Wno-stringop-truncation is the makefile
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> --
>
>
> So here's approach 2. However I note that a newer gcc 8.2.1
> does not give this warning. Maybe detect at configure time
> and suppress (option 3)?
I prepared patches yesterday to fix this issue, I'll send to the list
soon. I used another approach, replacing strncpy() by strpadcpy(pad=0).
> diff --git a/include/qemu/osdep.h b/include/qemu/osdep.h
> index 3bf48bcdec..64d8258529 100644
> --- a/include/qemu/osdep.h
> +++ b/include/qemu/osdep.h
> @@ -134,6 +134,22 @@ extern int daemon(int, int);
> #define assert(x) g_assert(x)
> #endif
>
> +/*
> + * GCC 8.0 declared war on strncpy. Admittedly it's a tricky interface
> + * with unintuitive semantics, but we use it widely.
> + */
> +#if defined(__GNUC__) && __GNUC__ >= 8
> +static inline void qemu_strncpy(char *to, const char *from, int n)
> +{
> +#pragma GCC diagnostic push
> +#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wstringop-truncation"
> + strncpy(to, from, n);
> +#pragma GCC diagnostic pop
> +}
> +
> +#define strncpy qemu_strncpy
> +#endif
> +
> /*
> * According to waitpid man page:
> * WCOREDUMP
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-18 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-18 4:03 [Qemu-devel] sheepdog build warning Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-12-18 4:16 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-12-18 10:14 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [this message]
2018-12-18 10:35 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e932f9c2-2466-9063-d441-6de9076ac525@redhat.com \
--to=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=jcody@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=meyering@redhat.com \
--cc=morita.kazutaka@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=namei.unix@gmail.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).