From: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel@redhat.com>
To: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.9 07/10] memhp: move GPE handler_E03 into build_memory_hotplug_aml()
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 14:31:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e9ac461e-ad69-bd6c-0127-5dc86af63ab2@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1480980749-182204-8-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com>
On 12/06/2016 01:32 AM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> From this patch all the memory hotplug related AML
> bits are consolidated in one place within DSTD.
> Follow up patches will utilize that to simplify
> memory hotplug related C/AML code.
I didn't quite understand what you mean...
>
> Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
> ---
> include/hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.h | 6 +++---
> hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 7 ++-----
> 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.h b/include/hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.h
> index 6dc48d2..37e2706 100644
> --- a/include/hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.h
> +++ b/include/hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.h
> @@ -49,9 +49,9 @@ void acpi_memory_ospm_status(MemHotplugState *mem_st, ACPIOSTInfoList ***list);
>
> #define MEMORY_HOTPLUG_DEVICE "MHPD"
> #define MEMORY_SLOT_SCAN_METHOD "MSCN"
> -#define MEMORY_HOTPLUG_HANDLER_PATH "\\_SB.PCI0." \
> - MEMORY_HOTPLUG_DEVICE "." MEMORY_SLOT_SCAN_METHOD
>
> void build_memory_hotplug_aml(Aml *table, uint32_t nr_mem,
> - uint16_t io_base, uint16_t io_len);
> + uint16_t io_base, uint16_t io_len,
> + const char *res_root,
> + const char *event_handler_method);
> #endif
> diff --git a/hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.c b/hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.c
> index 18b95f2..49e856f 100644
> --- a/hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.c
> +++ b/hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -308,18 +308,19 @@ const VMStateDescription vmstate_memory_hotplug = {
> };
>
> void build_memory_hotplug_aml(Aml *table, uint32_t nr_mem,
> - uint16_t io_base, uint16_t io_len)
> + uint16_t io_base, uint16_t io_len,
> + const char *res_root,
> + const char *event_handler_method)
> {
> int i;
> Aml *ifctx;
> Aml *method;
> - Aml *pci_scope;
> Aml *sb_scope;
> Aml *mem_ctrl_dev;
> + char *scan_path;
> + char *mhp_res_path = g_strdup_printf("%s." MEMORY_HOTPLUG_DEVICE, res_root);
>
> - /* scope for memory hotplug controller device node */
> - pci_scope = aml_scope("_SB.PCI0");
> - mem_ctrl_dev = aml_device(MEMORY_HOTPLUG_DEVICE);
> + mem_ctrl_dev = aml_device("%s", mhp_res_path);
Will mem_ctrl_dev's name will have an extra "." suffix now?
> {
> Aml *crs;
> Aml *field;
> @@ -610,47 +611,50 @@ void build_memory_hotplug_aml(Aml *table, uint32_t nr_mem,
> }
> aml_append(mem_ctrl_dev, method);
> }
> - aml_append(pci_scope, mem_ctrl_dev);
> - aml_append(table, pci_scope);
> + aml_append(table, mem_ctrl_dev);
>
> sb_scope = aml_scope("_SB");
> /* build memory devices */
> for (i = 0; i < nr_mem; i++) {
> - #define BASEPATH "\\_SB.PCI0." MEMORY_HOTPLUG_DEVICE "."
> Aml *dev;
> - const char *s;
> + char *s;
>
> dev = aml_device("MP%02X", i);
> aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_UID", aml_string("0x%02X", i)));
> aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_HID", aml_eisaid("PNP0C80")));
>
> method = aml_method("_CRS", 0, AML_NOTSERIALIZED);
> - s = BASEPATH MEMORY_SLOT_CRS_METHOD;
> + s = g_strdup_printf("%s.%s", mhp_res_path, MEMORY_SLOT_CRS_METHOD);
Same question here, do we get ".." in the path? Maybe is OK?
Thanks,
Marcel
> aml_append(method, aml_return(aml_call1(s, aml_name("_UID"))));
> + g_free(s);
> aml_append(dev, method);
>
> method = aml_method("_STA", 0, AML_NOTSERIALIZED);
> - s = BASEPATH MEMORY_SLOT_STATUS_METHOD;
> + s = g_strdup_printf("%s.%s", mhp_res_path, MEMORY_SLOT_STATUS_METHOD);
> aml_append(method, aml_return(aml_call1(s, aml_name("_UID"))));
> + g_free(s);
> aml_append(dev, method);
>
> method = aml_method("_PXM", 0, AML_NOTSERIALIZED);
> - s = BASEPATH MEMORY_SLOT_PROXIMITY_METHOD;
> + s = g_strdup_printf("%s.%s", mhp_res_path,
> + MEMORY_SLOT_PROXIMITY_METHOD);
> aml_append(method, aml_return(aml_call1(s, aml_name("_UID"))));
> + g_free(s);
> aml_append(dev, method);
>
> method = aml_method("_OST", 3, AML_NOTSERIALIZED);
> - s = BASEPATH MEMORY_SLOT_OST_METHOD;
> -
> + s = g_strdup_printf("%s.%s", mhp_res_path, MEMORY_SLOT_OST_METHOD);
> aml_append(method, aml_return(aml_call4(
> s, aml_name("_UID"), aml_arg(0), aml_arg(1), aml_arg(2)
> )));
> + g_free(s);
> aml_append(dev, method);
>
> method = aml_method("_EJ0", 1, AML_NOTSERIALIZED);
> - s = BASEPATH MEMORY_SLOT_EJECT_METHOD;
> + s = g_strdup_printf("%s.%s", mhp_res_path, MEMORY_SLOT_EJECT_METHOD);
> aml_append(method, aml_return(aml_call2(
> s, aml_name("_UID"), aml_arg(0))));
> + g_free(s);
> aml_append(dev, method);
>
> aml_append(sb_scope, dev);
> @@ -669,4 +673,12 @@ void build_memory_hotplug_aml(Aml *table, uint32_t nr_mem,
> }
> aml_append(sb_scope, method);
> aml_append(table, sb_scope);
> +
> + method = aml_method(event_handler_method, 0, AML_NOTSERIALIZED);
> + scan_path = g_strdup_printf("%s.%s", mhp_res_path, MEMORY_SLOT_SCAN_METHOD);
> + aml_append(method, aml_call0(scan_path));
> + g_free(scan_path);
> + aml_append(table, method);
> +
> + g_free(mhp_res_path);
> }
> diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> index 690e9a0..b7f4682 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> @@ -1926,7 +1926,8 @@ build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker,
> "\\_SB.PCI0", "\\_GPE._E02");
> }
> build_memory_hotplug_aml(dsdt, nr_mem, pm->mem_hp_io_base,
> - pm->mem_hp_io_len);
> + pm->mem_hp_io_len,
> + "\\_SB.PCI0", "\\_GPE._E03");
>
> scope = aml_scope("_GPE");
> {
> @@ -1941,10 +1942,6 @@ build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker,
> aml_append(scope, method);
> }
>
> - method = aml_method("_E03", 0, AML_NOTSERIALIZED);
> - aml_append(method, aml_call0(MEMORY_HOTPLUG_HANDLER_PATH));
> - aml_append(scope, method);
> -
> if (pcms->acpi_nvdimm_state.is_enabled) {
> method = aml_method("_E04", 0, AML_NOTSERIALIZED);
> aml_append(method, aml_notify(aml_name("\\_SB.NVDR"),
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-21 12:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-05 23:32 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.9 00/10] pc: acpi: memory hotplug cleanup/consolidation Igor Mammedov
2016-12-05 23:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.9 01/10] tests: pc: add memory hotplug acpi tables tests Igor Mammedov
2016-12-20 10:40 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-12-20 16:17 ` Igor Mammedov
2016-12-20 17:00 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-12-05 23:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.9 02/10] tests: pc: acpi: add SRAT and DSDT blobs for memory hotplug variant Igor Mammedov
2016-12-05 23:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.9 03/10] memhp: move build_memory_hotplug_aml() into memory_hotplug.c Igor Mammedov
2016-12-20 10:42 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-12-05 23:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.9 04/10] memhp: move build_memory_devices() " Igor Mammedov
2016-12-20 10:44 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-12-20 16:24 ` Igor Mammedov
2016-12-05 23:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.9 05/10] memhp: consolidate scattered MHPD device declaration Igor Mammedov
2016-12-20 11:00 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-12-20 16:34 ` Igor Mammedov
2016-12-21 11:54 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-12-05 23:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.9 06/10] memhp: merge build_memory_devices() into build_memory_hotplug_aml() Igor Mammedov
2016-12-21 12:10 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-12-21 12:54 ` Igor Mammedov
2016-12-05 23:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.9 07/10] memhp: move GPE handler_E03 " Igor Mammedov
2016-12-21 12:31 ` Marcel Apfelbaum [this message]
2016-12-21 13:39 ` Igor Mammedov
2016-12-22 10:45 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-12-22 15:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.9 v2 " Igor Mammedov
2016-12-05 23:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.9 08/10] memhp: move memory hotplug only defines to memory_hotplug.c Igor Mammedov
2016-12-21 12:32 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-12-05 23:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.9 09/10] memhp: don't generate memory hotplug AML if it's not enabled/supported Igor Mammedov
2016-12-22 10:55 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-12-05 23:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.9 10/10] memhp: move DIMM devices into dedicated scope with related common methods Igor Mammedov
2016-12-22 12:31 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-12-22 13:31 ` Igor Mammedov
2016-12-22 13:53 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-12-22 14:10 ` Igor Mammedov
2016-12-16 9:07 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.9 00/10] pc: acpi: memory hotplug cleanup/consolidation Igor Mammedov
2017-01-09 14:22 ` Igor Mammedov
2017-01-09 14:39 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-01-10 5:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-01-10 12:29 ` Igor Mammedov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e9ac461e-ad69-bd6c-0127-5dc86af63ab2@redhat.com \
--to=marcel@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).