From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37585) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c9Gwg-0005fB-9j for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 14:41:35 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c9Gwd-0000w8-6o for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 14:41:34 -0500 Received: from mail-wj0-x243.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c01::243]:35857) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c9Gwc-0000uK-Vn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 14:41:31 -0500 Received: by mail-wj0-x243.google.com with SMTP id jb2so7075626wjb.3 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 11:41:30 -0800 (PST) Sender: Paolo Bonzini References: <1479808693-30234-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <99e2e550-dad4-335f-e2d7-8a286863f57c@redhat.com> <8871cadb-3edf-5a3f-2da5-8981c12b79a0@redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 20:41:27 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8871cadb-3edf-5a3f-2da5-8981c12b79a0@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] drm: update MAINTAINERS for qemu drivers (bochs, cirrus, qxl, virtio-gpu) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake , Thomas Huth , Gerd Hoffmann , David Airlie , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: open list On 22/11/2016 19:54, Eric Blake wrote: >>> >> DRM DRIVER FOR BOCHS VIRTUAL GPU >>> >> M: Gerd Hoffmann >>> >> -S: Odd Fixes >>> >> +L: qemu-devel@nongnu.org >> > >> > qemu-devel list already has very high traffic - not sure whether it >> > makes much sense to route even more additional patches here. Maybe >> > rather create a separate mailing list like qemu-graphics@nongnu.org ? > In practice, ALL patches should already be going to qemu-devel, even if > they are ALSO going to some other list. For example, qemu-block and > qemu-trivial are definitely cases where we have separate lists, but > where posters are reminded to include qemu-devel in cc if they want a > patch applied. The difference is that these would be kernel patches. Paolo