From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68A37C432C0 for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 12:33:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33D96205ED for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 12:33:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="gq6+NIkP" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 33D96205ED Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:35056 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ibktk-0002Mc-Bh for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 07:33:52 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51536) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ibkrT-0000jv-EW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 07:31:32 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ibkrS-0002oX-E5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 07:31:31 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:51701 helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ibkrS-0002oL-AC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 07:31:30 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1575289889; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=2Ic3nJqhdf0tuP/k4oPZml9dPK8NJxkiKAlvTlnMWzg=; b=gq6+NIkPhunArLo7z1BdyPlI0xUkeXiuo5+xoirZmPTxlRwUT7e4XLg46fzMWqRzxiKT4O HFUdVx0nUz6Vr72D6oZpk4LhHGy+YmmsvXe62BzyxvhwnOnPu9MqUdc1EfoPMzeSxQdRQ7 3SuIi7wN9rN0KGRgf187LSBnspIXBZg= Received: from mail-wr1-f70.google.com (mail-wr1-f70.google.com [209.85.221.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-32-SYm24msXMsy-6bBe6Y54jA-1; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 07:31:27 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f70.google.com with SMTP id z15so1558649wrw.0 for ; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 04:31:27 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=w5SYgqs2iFKzC0li+V+BKsDheq2A4/lLKctc2SRiMDk=; b=TlhYrCBHf/MTVT24p+jZ1S6MRoS9m5IL7YGGs/dFJW0Mn+OnpErpbGem5/IUirUKQc K2Y/MDQDkhiXeO+1vPT/kAmTMoXRuxzIcjkUXDeCT+zBKzhpPb7R/kRsQqH8AJ9W+Ez8 sPSS0wdl7RMC8W4zYmnSF94cMRUfjGgeM3vjtmLERqD+nEwgZF1VHIGKwkP0CZX4Gal5 NLlsKbnX5BUJrngCh2geHU47+tFDEe7neWbF3BM8brScI5l2k0RJw/n0HJJAzQg+InEx j7gaCbnJkA/MCk2AwD4Qf2tr32jLHy/BIWIhcV51ZLw0BOR95WV+p0SzJt5F1XiObJST m/hA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWcHN9vNGGndkyOnzIXgLNSrDZ6sM5NzMxQEqHUhvb36S6A0TWe 1lokMb1Q/95IGLxvheoeU+R+mjoOgKoGWtbuK8s1qYOdat36br0RTpNExiY8katOADwrsjdBI2k yESflugUFTjWG/3w= X-Received: by 2002:adf:e78a:: with SMTP id n10mr49531854wrm.62.1575289885958; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 04:31:25 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyjrEMNqTNmapoe3NXzh1gYDKqD96RmQ1RQ2jn6KI1RhZ66WeFLc3DycANp6HKYaIvOMlALsw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:e78a:: with SMTP id n10mr49531835wrm.62.1575289885777; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 04:31:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.35] (182.red-88-21-103.staticip.rima-tde.net. [88.21.103.182]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v14sm39511558wrm.28.2019.12.02.04.31.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 02 Dec 2019 04:31:25 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: iPXE: update submodule To: Gerd Hoffmann References: <20191202121853.shigtyrko725vmmg@sirius.home.kraxel.org> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= Message-ID: Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2019 13:31:24 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191202121853.shigtyrko725vmmg@sirius.home.kraxel.org> Content-Language: en-US X-MC-Unique: SYm24msXMsy-6bBe6Y54jA-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 205.139.110.61 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: qemu-devel Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 12/2/19 1:18 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 12:19:50PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9 wro= te: >> Hi Gerd, >> >> 'make -C roms efirom' is failing on Fedora 30. >> >> Can you update the iPXE submodule so we get these buildsys commits: >> >> c742c576 [build] Move predefined all-drivers build shortcut to Makefile >> a4f8c6e3 [build] Do not apply WORKAROUND_CFLAGS for host compiler >> 1dd56dbd [build] Workaround compilation error with gcc 9.1 >> 412acd78 [build] Fix "'%s' directive argument is null" error >=20 > Hmm. Sure, can do that, but the question is for 4.2 or 5.0. Updating > ipxe that close to the release makes me nervous, but shipping a ipxe > version which doesn't build with recent compilers in the release tarball > isn't great either. >=20 > I'd tend to go the 5.0 route. I think 5.0 is OK, because if distributions build it, the are probably=20 already backporting these patches, so they can backport the QEMU patch=20 instead.