From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45649) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjQXK-0001P4-2S for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 08:12:50 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjQXG-0007Qm-4y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 08:12:50 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58710) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjQXF-0007QH-V2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 08:12:46 -0500 References: <41cc9d11-2e28-5b5e-4772-81a118d79111@redhat.com> <20170227101817.11748-1-mmarek@suse.com> <41e6edc0-204b-62b7-93b8-b376a40542d6@twiddle.net> <175599de-8f4f-8d22-d36e-6fb250ec49f4@suse.com> From: David Hildenbrand Message-ID: Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 14:12:42 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <175599de-8f4f-8d22-d36e-6fb250ec49f4@suse.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4] target-s390x: Implement stfl and stfle List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Michal Marek , Richard Henderson , Alexander Graf , Thomas Huth Cc: Eric Bischoff , Miroslav Benes , qemu-devel@nongnu.org >> As it happens, this reminds me that I wrote a version of this several >> years ago but never submitted it upstream. I'll dig it out. > > So, does it make sense for me to post a v5 again not using > s390_cpu_virt_mem_write(), or are you going to refresh your stfle > implementation? > > Thanks, > Michal > A new implementation should definitely take care of the CPU model. -- Thanks, David