qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
	pasic@linux.ibm.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org,
	david@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com,
	pbonzini@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, ehabkost@redhat.com,
	marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com, philmd@redhat.com, eblake@redhat.com,
	armbru@redhat.com, seiden@linux.ibm.com, nrb@linux.ibm.com,
	frankja@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 03/13] s390x: topology: CPU topology objects and structures
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 17:22:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ebbd2e46-3abb-2920-fa6c-f1b74fc1c203@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f18cc9b2-c897-d15b-706f-7a2cba2a1484@redhat.com>



On 5/19/22 12:45, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 20/04/2022 13.57, Pierre Morel wrote:
>> We use new objects to have a dynamic administration of the CPU topology.
>> The highest level object in this implementation is the s390 book and
>> in this first implementation of CPU topology for S390 we have a single
>> book.
>> The book is built as a SYSBUS bridge during the CPU initialization.
>> Other objects, sockets and core will be built after the parsing
>> of the QEMU -smp argument.
>>
>> Every object under this single book will be build dynamically
>> immediately after a CPU has be realized if it is needed.
>> The CPU will fill the sockets once after the other, according to the
>> number of core per socket defined during the smp parsing.
>>
>> Each CPU inside a socket will be represented by a bit in a 64bit
>> unsigned long. Set on plug and clear on unplug of a CPU.
>>
>> For the S390 CPU topology, thread and cores are merged into
>> topology cores and the number of topology cores is the multiplication
>> of cores by the numbers of threads.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>   hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c         | 361 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   hw/s390x/meson.build            |   1 +
>>   hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c      |   4 +
>>   include/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h |  74 +++++++
>>   target/s390x/cpu.h              |  47 +++++
>>   5 files changed, 487 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c
>>   create mode 100644 include/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c b/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000000..b7131b4ac3
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,361 @@
>> +/*
>> + * CPU Topology
>> + *
>> + * Copyright 2021 IBM Corp.
> 
> 2022 now?

as time goes by...

> 
>> + * Author(s): Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
>> +
>> + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or 
>> (at
>> + * your option) any later version. See the COPYING file in the top-level
>> + * directory.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include "qemu/osdep.h"
>> +#include "qapi/error.h"
>> +#include "qemu/error-report.h"
>> +#include "hw/sysbus.h"
>> +#include "hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h"
>> +#include "hw/qdev-properties.h"
>> +#include "hw/boards.h"
>> +#include "qemu/typedefs.h"
>> +#include "target/s390x/cpu.h"
>> +#include "hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.h"
>> +
>> +static S390TopologyCores *s390_create_cores(S390TopologySocket *socket,
>> +                                            int origin)
>> +{
>> +    DeviceState *dev;
>> +    S390TopologyCores *cores;
>> +    const MachineState *ms = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
>> +
>> +    if (socket->bus->num_children >= (ms->smp.cores * 
>> ms->smp.threads)) {
> 
> You can drop the innermost parentheses.

OK

> 
> Also, can this situation ever happen? If not, please turn it into an 
> assert() instead.
>  >> +        return NULL;
> 
> You return NULL here, but the callers don't check for NULL and use the 
> pointer anyway. So either this should not return NULL or you have to 
> check the value at the calling site.

It can happen, I must check the return value at the caller.
Thanks

> 
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    dev = qdev_new(TYPE_S390_TOPOLOGY_CORES);
>> +    qdev_realize_and_unref(dev, socket->bus, &error_fatal);
>> +
>> +    cores = S390_TOPOLOGY_CORES(dev);
>> +    cores->origin = origin;
>> +    socket->cnt += 1;
>> +
>> +    return cores;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static S390TopologySocket *s390_create_socket(S390TopologyBook *book, 
>> int id)
>> +{
>> +    DeviceState *dev;
>> +    S390TopologySocket *socket;
>> +    const MachineState *ms = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
> 
> You already look up the MachineState pointer in s390_topology_new_cpu() 
> ... so to optimize a little bit, you could pass it in as parameter here 
> instead.

Yes, thanks

> 
>> +    if (book->bus->num_children >= ms->smp.sockets) {
>> +        return NULL;
> 
> Here again - the callers do not check for NULL pointer values, so this 
> should either not return NULL or the callers need to be changed.

hum, should never happen so I will change this with an assert.
But searching the answer I found a beautiful bug in the caller.

> 
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    dev = qdev_new(TYPE_S390_TOPOLOGY_SOCKET);
>> +    qdev_realize_and_unref(dev, book->bus, &error_fatal);
>> +
>> +    socket = S390_TOPOLOGY_SOCKET(dev);
>> +    socket->socket_id = id;
>> +    book->cnt++;
>> +
>> +    return socket;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * s390_get_cores:
>> + * @socket: the socket to search into
>> + * @origin: the origin specified for the S390TopologyCores
>> + *
>> + * returns a pointer to a S390TopologyCores structure within a socket 
>> having
>> + * the specified origin.
>> + * First search if the socket is already containing the 
>> S390TopologyCores
>> + * structure and if not create one with this origin.
>> + */
>> +static S390TopologyCores *s390_get_cores(S390TopologySocket *socket, 
>> int origin)
>> +{
>> +    S390TopologyCores *cores;
>> +    BusChild *kid;
>> +
>> +    QTAILQ_FOREACH(kid, &socket->bus->children, sibling) {
>> +        cores = S390_TOPOLOGY_CORES(kid->child);
>> +        if (cores->origin == origin) {
>> +            return cores;
>> +        }
>> +    }
>> +    return s390_create_cores(socket, origin);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * s390_get_socket:
>> + * @book: The book to search into
>> + * @socket_id: the identifier of the socket to search for
>> + *
>> + * returns a pointer to a S390TopologySocket structure within a book 
>> having
>> + * the specified socket_id.
>> + * First search if the book is already containing the S390TopologySocket
>> + * structure and if not create one with this socket_id.
>> + */
>> +static S390TopologySocket *s390_get_socket(S390TopologyBook *book,
>> +                                           int socket_id)
>> +{
>> +    S390TopologySocket *socket;
>> +    BusChild *kid;
>> +
>> +    QTAILQ_FOREACH(kid, &book->bus->children, sibling) {
>> +        socket = S390_TOPOLOGY_SOCKET(kid->child);
>> +        if (socket->socket_id == socket_id) {
>> +            return socket;
>> +        }
>> +    }
>> +    return s390_create_socket(book, socket_id);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * s390_topology_new_cpu:
>> + * @core_id: the core ID is machine wide
>> + *
>> + * We have a single book returned by s390_get_topology(),
>> + * then we build the hierarchy on demand.
>> + * Note that we do not destroy the hierarchy on error creating
>> + * an entry in the topology, we just keep it empty.
>> + * We do not need to worry about not finding a topology level
>> + * entry this would have been caught during smp parsing.
>> + */
>> +void s390_topology_new_cpu(int core_id)
>> +{
>> +    const MachineState *ms = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
>> +    S390TopologyBook *book;
>> +    S390TopologySocket *socket;
>> +    S390TopologyCores *cores;
>> +    int cores_per_socket, sock_idx;
>> +    int origin, bit;
>> +
>> +    book = s390_get_topology();
>> +
>> +    cores_per_socket = ms->smp.max_cpus / ms->smp.sockets;
>> +
>> +    sock_idx = (core_id / cores_per_socket);
>> +    socket = s390_get_socket(book, sock_idx);
>> +
>> +    /*
>> +     * At the core level, each CPU is represented by a bit in a 64bit
>> +     * unsigned long. Set on plug and clear on unplug of a CPU.
>> +     * The firmware assume that all CPU in the core description have 
>> the same
>> +     * type, polarization and are all dedicated or shared.
>> +     * In the case a socket contains CPU with different type, 
>> polarization
>> +     * or dedication then they will be defined in different CPU 
>> containers.
>> +     * Currently we assume all CPU are identical and the only reason 
>> to have
>> +     * several S390TopologyCores inside a socket is to have more than 
>> 64 CPUs
>> +     * in that case the origin field, representing the offset of the 
>> first CPU
>> +     * in the CPU container allows to represent up to the maximal 
>> number of
>> +     * CPU inside several CPU containers inside the socket container.
>> +     */
>> +    origin = 64 * (core_id / 64);
>> +
>> +    cores = s390_get_cores(socket, origin);
>> +
>> +    bit = 63 - (core_id - origin);
>> +    set_bit(bit, &cores->mask);
>> +    cores->origin = origin;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Setting the first topology: 1 book, 1 socket
>> + * This is enough for 64 cores if the topology is flat (single socket)
>> + */
>> +void s390_topology_setup(MachineState *ms)
>> +{
>> +    DeviceState *dev;
>> +
>> +    /* Create BOOK bridge device */
>> +    dev = qdev_new(TYPE_S390_TOPOLOGY_BOOK);
>> +    object_property_add_child(qdev_get_machine(),
>> +                              TYPE_S390_TOPOLOGY_BOOK, OBJECT(dev));
>> +    sysbus_realize_and_unref(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(dev), &error_fatal);
>> +}
>> +
>> +S390TopologyBook *s390_get_topology(void)
>> +{
>> +    static S390TopologyBook *book;
>> +
>> +    if (!book) {
>> +        book = S390_TOPOLOGY_BOOK(
>> +            object_resolve_path(TYPE_S390_TOPOLOGY_BOOK, NULL));
>> +        assert(book != NULL);
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return book;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* --- CORES Definitions --- */
>> +
>> +static Property s390_topology_cores_properties[] = {
>> +    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("dedicated", S390TopologyCores, dedicated, false),
>> +    DEFINE_PROP_UINT8("polarity", S390TopologyCores, polarity,
>> +                      S390_TOPOLOGY_POLARITY_H),
>> +    DEFINE_PROP_UINT8("cputype", S390TopologyCores, cputype,
>> +                      S390_TOPOLOGY_CPU_TYPE),
>> +    DEFINE_PROP_UINT16("origin", S390TopologyCores, origin, 0),
>> +    DEFINE_PROP_UINT64("mask", S390TopologyCores, mask, 0),
>> +    DEFINE_PROP_UINT8("id", S390TopologyCores, id, 0),
>> +    DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
>> +};
>> +
>> +static void cpu_cores_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
>> +{
>> +    DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(oc);
>> +    HotplugHandlerClass *hc = HOTPLUG_HANDLER_CLASS(oc);
>> +
>> +    device_class_set_props(dc, s390_topology_cores_properties);
>> +    hc->unplug = qdev_simple_device_unplug_cb;
>> +    dc->bus_type = TYPE_S390_TOPOLOGY_SOCKET_BUS;
>> +    dc->desc = "topology cpu entry";
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const TypeInfo cpu_cores_info = {
>> +    .name          = TYPE_S390_TOPOLOGY_CORES,
>> +    .parent        = TYPE_DEVICE,
>> +    .instance_size = sizeof(S390TopologyCores),
>> +    .class_init    = cpu_cores_class_init,
>> +    .interfaces = (InterfaceInfo[]) {
>> +        { TYPE_HOTPLUG_HANDLER },
>> +        { }
>> +    }
>> +};
>> +
>> +/* --- SOCKETS Definitions --- */
>> +static Property s390_topology_socket_properties[] = {
>> +    DEFINE_PROP_UINT8("socket_id", S390TopologySocket, socket_id, 0),
>> +    DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
>> +};
>> +
>> +static char *socket_bus_get_dev_path(DeviceState *dev)
>> +{
>> +    S390TopologySocket *socket = S390_TOPOLOGY_SOCKET(dev);
>> +    DeviceState *book = dev->parent_bus->parent;
>> +    char *id = qdev_get_dev_path(book);
>> +    char *ret;
>> +
>> +    if (id) {
>> +        ret = g_strdup_printf("%s:%02d", id, socket->socket_id);
>> +        g_free(id);
>> +    } else {
>> +        ret = g_strdup_printf("_:%02d", socket->socket_id);
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void socket_bus_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
>> +{
>> +    BusClass *k = BUS_CLASS(oc);
>> +
>> +    k->get_dev_path = socket_bus_get_dev_path;
>> +    k->max_dev = S390_MAX_SOCKETS;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const TypeInfo socket_bus_info = {
>> +    .name = TYPE_S390_TOPOLOGY_SOCKET_BUS,
>> +    .parent = TYPE_BUS,
>> +    .instance_size = 0,
>> +    .class_init = socket_bus_class_init,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static void s390_socket_device_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>> +{
>> +    S390TopologySocket *socket = S390_TOPOLOGY_SOCKET(dev);
>> +    BusState *bus;
>> +
>> +    bus = qbus_new(TYPE_S390_TOPOLOGY_SOCKET_BUS, dev,
>> +                   TYPE_S390_TOPOLOGY_SOCKET_BUS);
>> +    qbus_set_hotplug_handler(bus, OBJECT(dev));
>> +    socket->bus = bus;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void socket_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
>> +{
>> +    DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(oc);
>> +    HotplugHandlerClass *hc = HOTPLUG_HANDLER_CLASS(oc);
>> +
>> +    hc->unplug = qdev_simple_device_unplug_cb;
>> +    set_bit(DEVICE_CATEGORY_BRIDGE, dc->categories);
>> +    dc->bus_type = TYPE_S390_TOPOLOGY_BOOK_BUS;
>> +    dc->realize = s390_socket_device_realize;
>> +    device_class_set_props(dc, s390_topology_socket_properties);
>> +    dc->desc = "topology socket";
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const TypeInfo socket_info = {
>> +    .name          = TYPE_S390_TOPOLOGY_SOCKET,
>> +    .parent        = TYPE_DEVICE,
>> +    .instance_size = sizeof(S390TopologySocket),
>> +    .class_init    = socket_class_init,
>> +    .interfaces = (InterfaceInfo[]) {
>> +        { TYPE_HOTPLUG_HANDLER },
>> +        { }
>> +    }
>> +};
>> +
>> +static char *book_bus_get_dev_path(DeviceState *dev)
>> +{
>> +    return g_strdup_printf("00");
> 
> If you just want to duplicate a static string, please g_strdup() instead.

OK, thanks.

> 
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void book_bus_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
>> +{
>> +    BusClass *k = BUS_CLASS(oc);
>> +
>> +    k->get_dev_path = book_bus_get_dev_path;
>> +    k->max_dev = S390_MAX_BOOKS;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const TypeInfo book_bus_info = {
>> +    .name = TYPE_S390_TOPOLOGY_BOOK_BUS,
>> +    .parent = TYPE_BUS,
>> +    .instance_size = 0,
>> +    .class_init = book_bus_class_init,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static void s390_book_device_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>> +{
>> +    S390TopologyBook *book = S390_TOPOLOGY_BOOK(dev);
>> +    BusState *bus;
>> +
>> +    bus = qbus_new(TYPE_S390_TOPOLOGY_BOOK_BUS, dev,
>> +                   TYPE_S390_TOPOLOGY_BOOK_BUS);
>> +    qbus_set_hotplug_handler(bus, OBJECT(dev));
>> +    book->bus = bus;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void book_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
>> +{
>> +    DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(oc);
>> +    HotplugHandlerClass *hc = HOTPLUG_HANDLER_CLASS(oc);
>> +
>> +    hc->unplug = qdev_simple_device_unplug_cb;
>> +    set_bit(DEVICE_CATEGORY_BRIDGE, dc->categories);
>> +    dc->realize = s390_book_device_realize;
>> +    dc->desc = "topology book";
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const TypeInfo book_info = {
>> +    .name          = TYPE_S390_TOPOLOGY_BOOK,
>> +    .parent        = TYPE_SYS_BUS_DEVICE,
>> +    .instance_size = sizeof(S390TopologyBook),
>> +    .class_init    = book_class_init,
>> +    .interfaces = (InterfaceInfo[]) {
>> +        { TYPE_HOTPLUG_HANDLER },
>> +        { }
>> +    }
>> +};
>> +
>> +static void topology_register(void)
>> +{
>> +    type_register_static(&cpu_cores_info);
>> +    type_register_static(&socket_bus_info);
>> +    type_register_static(&socket_info);
>> +    type_register_static(&book_bus_info);
>> +    type_register_static(&book_info);
>> +}
>> +
>> +type_init(topology_register);
>> diff --git a/hw/s390x/meson.build b/hw/s390x/meson.build
>> index 28484256ec..74678861cf 100644
>> --- a/hw/s390x/meson.build
>> +++ b/hw/s390x/meson.build
>> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ s390x_ss = ss.source_set()
>>   s390x_ss.add(files(
>>     'ap-bridge.c',
>>     'ap-device.c',
>> +  'cpu-topology.c',
>>     'ccw-device.c',
>>     'css-bridge.c',
>>     'css.c',
>> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
>> index 90480e7cf9..179846e3a3 100644
>> --- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
>> +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
>> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
>>   #include "sysemu/sysemu.h"
>>   #include "hw/s390x/pv.h"
>>   #include "migration/blocker.h"
>> +#include "hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h"
>>   static Error *pv_mig_blocker;
>> @@ -88,6 +89,7 @@ static void s390_init_cpus(MachineState *machine)
>>       /* initialize possible_cpus */
>>       mc->possible_cpu_arch_ids(machine);
>> +    s390_topology_setup(machine);
>>       for (i = 0; i < machine->smp.cpus; i++) {
>>           s390x_new_cpu(machine->cpu_type, i, &error_fatal);
>>       }
>> @@ -305,6 +307,8 @@ static void s390_cpu_plug(HotplugHandler 
>> *hotplug_dev,
>>       g_assert(!ms->possible_cpus->cpus[cpu->env.core_id].cpu);
>>       ms->possible_cpus->cpus[cpu->env.core_id].cpu = OBJECT(dev);
>> +    s390_topology_new_cpu(cpu->env.core_id);
> 
> Why not pass the "ms" MachineState value to s390_topology_new_cpu() 
> here, so you don't have to look it up there again?

Yes, will do.

> 
>>       if (dev->hotplugged) {
>>           raise_irq_cpu_hotplug();
>>       }
>> diff --git a/include/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h 
>> b/include/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000000..e6e013a8b8
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/include/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
>> +/*
>> + * CPU Topology
>> + *
>> + * Copyright 2021 IBM Corp.
> 
> 2022 now?

We are not getting younger....

> 
>> + *
>> + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or 
>> (at
>> + * your option) any later version. See the COPYING file in the top-level
>> + * directory.
>> + */
>> +#ifndef HW_S390X_CPU_TOPOLOGY_H
>> +#define HW_S390X_CPU_TOPOLOGY_H
>> +
>> +#include "hw/qdev-core.h"
>> +#include "qom/object.h"
>> +
>> +#define S390_TOPOLOGY_CPU_TYPE    0x03
>> +
>> +#define S390_TOPOLOGY_POLARITY_H  0x00
>> +#define S390_TOPOLOGY_POLARITY_VL 0x01
>> +#define S390_TOPOLOGY_POLARITY_VM 0x02
>> +#define S390_TOPOLOGY_POLARITY_VH 0x03
>> +
>> +#define TYPE_S390_TOPOLOGY_CORES "topology cores"
>> +    /*
>> +     * Each CPU inside a socket will be represented by a bit in a 64bit
>> +     * unsigned long. Set on plug and clear on unplug of a CPU.
>> +     * All CPU inside a mask share the same dedicated, polarity and
>> +     * cputype values.
>> +     * The origin is the offset of the first CPU in a mask.
>> +     */
>> +struct S390TopologyCores {
>> +    DeviceState parent_obj;
>> +    uint8_t id;
>> +    bool dedicated;
>> +    uint8_t polarity;
>> +    uint8_t cputype;
> 
> What's the benefit of using uint8_ts here? Why not simply an "int"?

none, int is OK

> 
>> +    uint16_t origin;
>> +    uint64_t mask;
>> +    int cnt;
>> +};
>> +typedef struct S390TopologyCores S390TopologyCores;
>> +OBJECT_DECLARE_SIMPLE_TYPE(S390TopologyCores, S390_TOPOLOGY_CORES)
>> +
>> +#define TYPE_S390_TOPOLOGY_SOCKET "topology socket"
>> +#define TYPE_S390_TOPOLOGY_SOCKET_BUS "socket-bus"
>> +struct S390TopologySocket {
>> +    DeviceState parent_obj;
>> +    BusState *bus;
>> +    uint8_t socket_id;
> 
> Again, why uint8_t ?
OK

> 
>> +    int cnt;
>> +};
>> +typedef struct S390TopologySocket S390TopologySocket;
>> +OBJECT_DECLARE_SIMPLE_TYPE(S390TopologySocket, S390_TOPOLOGY_SOCKET)
>> +#define S390_MAX_SOCKETS 4
>> +
>> +#define TYPE_S390_TOPOLOGY_BOOK "topology book"
>> +#define TYPE_S390_TOPOLOGY_BOOK_BUS "book-bus"
>> +struct S390TopologyBook {
>> +    SysBusDevice parent_obj;
>> +    BusState *bus;
>> +    uint8_t book_id;
> 
> dito

yes, right

> 
>> +    int cnt;
>> +};
>> +typedef struct S390TopologyBook S390TopologyBook;
>> +OBJECT_DECLARE_SIMPLE_TYPE(S390TopologyBook, S390_TOPOLOGY_BOOK)
>> +#define S390_MAX_BOOKS 1
>> +
>> +S390TopologyBook *s390_init_topology(void);
>> +
>> +S390TopologyBook *s390_get_topology(void);
>> +void s390_topology_setup(MachineState *ms);
>> +void s390_topology_new_cpu(int core_id);
>> +
>> +#endif
> 
>   Thomas
> 

Thanks Thomas for the review,

Regards,
Pierre

-- 
Pierre Morel
IBM Lab Boeblingen


  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-19 15:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-20 11:57 [PATCH v7 00/13] s390x: CPU Topology Pierre Morel
2022-04-20 11:57 ` [PATCH v7 01/13] Update linux headers Pierre Morel
2022-04-20 11:57 ` [PATCH v7 02/13] vfio: tolerate migration protocol v1 uapi renames Pierre Morel
2022-04-20 11:57 ` [PATCH v7 03/13] s390x: topology: CPU topology objects and structures Pierre Morel
2022-05-19 10:45   ` Thomas Huth
2022-05-19 15:22     ` Pierre Morel [this message]
2022-04-20 11:57 ` [PATCH v7 04/13] s390x: topology: implementating Store Topology System Information Pierre Morel
2022-05-24 10:59   ` Thomas Huth
2022-05-25  8:16     ` Pierre Morel
2022-05-24 11:08   ` Thomas Huth
2022-05-25  8:18     ` Pierre Morel
2022-04-20 11:57 ` [PATCH v7 05/13] s390x: topology: Adding books to CPU topology Pierre Morel
2022-04-20 11:57 ` [PATCH v7 06/13] s390x: topology: Adding books to STSI Pierre Morel
2022-05-24 11:07   ` Thomas Huth
2022-05-25  8:17     ` Pierre Morel
2022-04-20 11:57 ` [PATCH v7 07/13] s390x: topology: Adding drawers to CPU topology Pierre Morel
2022-04-20 11:57 ` [PATCH v7 08/13] s390x: topology: Adding drawers to STSI Pierre Morel
2022-05-24 11:10   ` Thomas Huth
2022-05-25  8:19     ` Pierre Morel
2022-04-20 11:57 ` [PATCH v7 09/13] s390x: topology: implementing numa for the s390x topology Pierre Morel
2022-04-20 11:57 ` [PATCH v7 10/13] s390x: kvm: topology: interception of PTF instruction Pierre Morel
2022-05-24 11:27   ` Thomas Huth
2022-05-25  8:22     ` Pierre Morel
2022-04-20 11:57 ` [PATCH v7 11/13] s390x: topology: resetting the Topology-Change-Report Pierre Morel
2022-04-20 11:57 ` [PATCH v7 12/13] s390x: CPU topology: CPU topology migration Pierre Morel
2022-05-24 11:32   ` Thomas Huth
2022-05-25  8:23     ` Pierre Morel
2022-04-20 11:57 ` [PATCH v7 13/13] s390x: topology: activating CPU topology Pierre Morel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ebbd2e46-3abb-2920-fa6c-f1b74fc1c203@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=philmd@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).