From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
pasic@linux.ibm.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org,
david@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, ehabkost@redhat.com,
marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com, philmd@redhat.com, eblake@redhat.com,
armbru@redhat.com, seiden@linux.ibm.com, nrb@linux.ibm.com,
frankja@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 03/13] s390x: topology: CPU topology objects and structures
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 17:22:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ebbd2e46-3abb-2920-fa6c-f1b74fc1c203@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f18cc9b2-c897-d15b-706f-7a2cba2a1484@redhat.com>
On 5/19/22 12:45, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 20/04/2022 13.57, Pierre Morel wrote:
>> We use new objects to have a dynamic administration of the CPU topology.
>> The highest level object in this implementation is the s390 book and
>> in this first implementation of CPU topology for S390 we have a single
>> book.
>> The book is built as a SYSBUS bridge during the CPU initialization.
>> Other objects, sockets and core will be built after the parsing
>> of the QEMU -smp argument.
>>
>> Every object under this single book will be build dynamically
>> immediately after a CPU has be realized if it is needed.
>> The CPU will fill the sockets once after the other, according to the
>> number of core per socket defined during the smp parsing.
>>
>> Each CPU inside a socket will be represented by a bit in a 64bit
>> unsigned long. Set on plug and clear on unplug of a CPU.
>>
>> For the S390 CPU topology, thread and cores are merged into
>> topology cores and the number of topology cores is the multiplication
>> of cores by the numbers of threads.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c | 361 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> hw/s390x/meson.build | 1 +
>> hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 4 +
>> include/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h | 74 +++++++
>> target/s390x/cpu.h | 47 +++++
>> 5 files changed, 487 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c
>> create mode 100644 include/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c b/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000000..b7131b4ac3
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,361 @@
>> +/*
>> + * CPU Topology
>> + *
>> + * Copyright 2021 IBM Corp.
>
> 2022 now?
as time goes by...
>
>> + * Author(s): Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
>> +
>> + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or
>> (at
>> + * your option) any later version. See the COPYING file in the top-level
>> + * directory.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include "qemu/osdep.h"
>> +#include "qapi/error.h"
>> +#include "qemu/error-report.h"
>> +#include "hw/sysbus.h"
>> +#include "hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h"
>> +#include "hw/qdev-properties.h"
>> +#include "hw/boards.h"
>> +#include "qemu/typedefs.h"
>> +#include "target/s390x/cpu.h"
>> +#include "hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.h"
>> +
>> +static S390TopologyCores *s390_create_cores(S390TopologySocket *socket,
>> + int origin)
>> +{
>> + DeviceState *dev;
>> + S390TopologyCores *cores;
>> + const MachineState *ms = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
>> +
>> + if (socket->bus->num_children >= (ms->smp.cores *
>> ms->smp.threads)) {
>
> You can drop the innermost parentheses.
OK
>
> Also, can this situation ever happen? If not, please turn it into an
> assert() instead.
> >> + return NULL;
>
> You return NULL here, but the callers don't check for NULL and use the
> pointer anyway. So either this should not return NULL or you have to
> check the value at the calling site.
It can happen, I must check the return value at the caller.
Thanks
>
>> + }
>> +
>> + dev = qdev_new(TYPE_S390_TOPOLOGY_CORES);
>> + qdev_realize_and_unref(dev, socket->bus, &error_fatal);
>> +
>> + cores = S390_TOPOLOGY_CORES(dev);
>> + cores->origin = origin;
>> + socket->cnt += 1;
>> +
>> + return cores;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static S390TopologySocket *s390_create_socket(S390TopologyBook *book,
>> int id)
>> +{
>> + DeviceState *dev;
>> + S390TopologySocket *socket;
>> + const MachineState *ms = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
>
> You already look up the MachineState pointer in s390_topology_new_cpu()
> ... so to optimize a little bit, you could pass it in as parameter here
> instead.
Yes, thanks
>
>> + if (book->bus->num_children >= ms->smp.sockets) {
>> + return NULL;
>
> Here again - the callers do not check for NULL pointer values, so this
> should either not return NULL or the callers need to be changed.
hum, should never happen so I will change this with an assert.
But searching the answer I found a beautiful bug in the caller.
>
>> + }
>> +
>> + dev = qdev_new(TYPE_S390_TOPOLOGY_SOCKET);
>> + qdev_realize_and_unref(dev, book->bus, &error_fatal);
>> +
>> + socket = S390_TOPOLOGY_SOCKET(dev);
>> + socket->socket_id = id;
>> + book->cnt++;
>> +
>> + return socket;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * s390_get_cores:
>> + * @socket: the socket to search into
>> + * @origin: the origin specified for the S390TopologyCores
>> + *
>> + * returns a pointer to a S390TopologyCores structure within a socket
>> having
>> + * the specified origin.
>> + * First search if the socket is already containing the
>> S390TopologyCores
>> + * structure and if not create one with this origin.
>> + */
>> +static S390TopologyCores *s390_get_cores(S390TopologySocket *socket,
>> int origin)
>> +{
>> + S390TopologyCores *cores;
>> + BusChild *kid;
>> +
>> + QTAILQ_FOREACH(kid, &socket->bus->children, sibling) {
>> + cores = S390_TOPOLOGY_CORES(kid->child);
>> + if (cores->origin == origin) {
>> + return cores;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + return s390_create_cores(socket, origin);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * s390_get_socket:
>> + * @book: The book to search into
>> + * @socket_id: the identifier of the socket to search for
>> + *
>> + * returns a pointer to a S390TopologySocket structure within a book
>> having
>> + * the specified socket_id.
>> + * First search if the book is already containing the S390TopologySocket
>> + * structure and if not create one with this socket_id.
>> + */
>> +static S390TopologySocket *s390_get_socket(S390TopologyBook *book,
>> + int socket_id)
>> +{
>> + S390TopologySocket *socket;
>> + BusChild *kid;
>> +
>> + QTAILQ_FOREACH(kid, &book->bus->children, sibling) {
>> + socket = S390_TOPOLOGY_SOCKET(kid->child);
>> + if (socket->socket_id == socket_id) {
>> + return socket;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + return s390_create_socket(book, socket_id);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * s390_topology_new_cpu:
>> + * @core_id: the core ID is machine wide
>> + *
>> + * We have a single book returned by s390_get_topology(),
>> + * then we build the hierarchy on demand.
>> + * Note that we do not destroy the hierarchy on error creating
>> + * an entry in the topology, we just keep it empty.
>> + * We do not need to worry about not finding a topology level
>> + * entry this would have been caught during smp parsing.
>> + */
>> +void s390_topology_new_cpu(int core_id)
>> +{
>> + const MachineState *ms = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
>> + S390TopologyBook *book;
>> + S390TopologySocket *socket;
>> + S390TopologyCores *cores;
>> + int cores_per_socket, sock_idx;
>> + int origin, bit;
>> +
>> + book = s390_get_topology();
>> +
>> + cores_per_socket = ms->smp.max_cpus / ms->smp.sockets;
>> +
>> + sock_idx = (core_id / cores_per_socket);
>> + socket = s390_get_socket(book, sock_idx);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * At the core level, each CPU is represented by a bit in a 64bit
>> + * unsigned long. Set on plug and clear on unplug of a CPU.
>> + * The firmware assume that all CPU in the core description have
>> the same
>> + * type, polarization and are all dedicated or shared.
>> + * In the case a socket contains CPU with different type,
>> polarization
>> + * or dedication then they will be defined in different CPU
>> containers.
>> + * Currently we assume all CPU are identical and the only reason
>> to have
>> + * several S390TopologyCores inside a socket is to have more than
>> 64 CPUs
>> + * in that case the origin field, representing the offset of the
>> first CPU
>> + * in the CPU container allows to represent up to the maximal
>> number of
>> + * CPU inside several CPU containers inside the socket container.
>> + */
>> + origin = 64 * (core_id / 64);
>> +
>> + cores = s390_get_cores(socket, origin);
>> +
>> + bit = 63 - (core_id - origin);
>> + set_bit(bit, &cores->mask);
>> + cores->origin = origin;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Setting the first topology: 1 book, 1 socket
>> + * This is enough for 64 cores if the topology is flat (single socket)
>> + */
>> +void s390_topology_setup(MachineState *ms)
>> +{
>> + DeviceState *dev;
>> +
>> + /* Create BOOK bridge device */
>> + dev = qdev_new(TYPE_S390_TOPOLOGY_BOOK);
>> + object_property_add_child(qdev_get_machine(),
>> + TYPE_S390_TOPOLOGY_BOOK, OBJECT(dev));
>> + sysbus_realize_and_unref(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(dev), &error_fatal);
>> +}
>> +
>> +S390TopologyBook *s390_get_topology(void)
>> +{
>> + static S390TopologyBook *book;
>> +
>> + if (!book) {
>> + book = S390_TOPOLOGY_BOOK(
>> + object_resolve_path(TYPE_S390_TOPOLOGY_BOOK, NULL));
>> + assert(book != NULL);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return book;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* --- CORES Definitions --- */
>> +
>> +static Property s390_topology_cores_properties[] = {
>> + DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("dedicated", S390TopologyCores, dedicated, false),
>> + DEFINE_PROP_UINT8("polarity", S390TopologyCores, polarity,
>> + S390_TOPOLOGY_POLARITY_H),
>> + DEFINE_PROP_UINT8("cputype", S390TopologyCores, cputype,
>> + S390_TOPOLOGY_CPU_TYPE),
>> + DEFINE_PROP_UINT16("origin", S390TopologyCores, origin, 0),
>> + DEFINE_PROP_UINT64("mask", S390TopologyCores, mask, 0),
>> + DEFINE_PROP_UINT8("id", S390TopologyCores, id, 0),
>> + DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
>> +};
>> +
>> +static void cpu_cores_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
>> +{
>> + DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(oc);
>> + HotplugHandlerClass *hc = HOTPLUG_HANDLER_CLASS(oc);
>> +
>> + device_class_set_props(dc, s390_topology_cores_properties);
>> + hc->unplug = qdev_simple_device_unplug_cb;
>> + dc->bus_type = TYPE_S390_TOPOLOGY_SOCKET_BUS;
>> + dc->desc = "topology cpu entry";
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const TypeInfo cpu_cores_info = {
>> + .name = TYPE_S390_TOPOLOGY_CORES,
>> + .parent = TYPE_DEVICE,
>> + .instance_size = sizeof(S390TopologyCores),
>> + .class_init = cpu_cores_class_init,
>> + .interfaces = (InterfaceInfo[]) {
>> + { TYPE_HOTPLUG_HANDLER },
>> + { }
>> + }
>> +};
>> +
>> +/* --- SOCKETS Definitions --- */
>> +static Property s390_topology_socket_properties[] = {
>> + DEFINE_PROP_UINT8("socket_id", S390TopologySocket, socket_id, 0),
>> + DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
>> +};
>> +
>> +static char *socket_bus_get_dev_path(DeviceState *dev)
>> +{
>> + S390TopologySocket *socket = S390_TOPOLOGY_SOCKET(dev);
>> + DeviceState *book = dev->parent_bus->parent;
>> + char *id = qdev_get_dev_path(book);
>> + char *ret;
>> +
>> + if (id) {
>> + ret = g_strdup_printf("%s:%02d", id, socket->socket_id);
>> + g_free(id);
>> + } else {
>> + ret = g_strdup_printf("_:%02d", socket->socket_id);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void socket_bus_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
>> +{
>> + BusClass *k = BUS_CLASS(oc);
>> +
>> + k->get_dev_path = socket_bus_get_dev_path;
>> + k->max_dev = S390_MAX_SOCKETS;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const TypeInfo socket_bus_info = {
>> + .name = TYPE_S390_TOPOLOGY_SOCKET_BUS,
>> + .parent = TYPE_BUS,
>> + .instance_size = 0,
>> + .class_init = socket_bus_class_init,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static void s390_socket_device_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>> +{
>> + S390TopologySocket *socket = S390_TOPOLOGY_SOCKET(dev);
>> + BusState *bus;
>> +
>> + bus = qbus_new(TYPE_S390_TOPOLOGY_SOCKET_BUS, dev,
>> + TYPE_S390_TOPOLOGY_SOCKET_BUS);
>> + qbus_set_hotplug_handler(bus, OBJECT(dev));
>> + socket->bus = bus;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void socket_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
>> +{
>> + DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(oc);
>> + HotplugHandlerClass *hc = HOTPLUG_HANDLER_CLASS(oc);
>> +
>> + hc->unplug = qdev_simple_device_unplug_cb;
>> + set_bit(DEVICE_CATEGORY_BRIDGE, dc->categories);
>> + dc->bus_type = TYPE_S390_TOPOLOGY_BOOK_BUS;
>> + dc->realize = s390_socket_device_realize;
>> + device_class_set_props(dc, s390_topology_socket_properties);
>> + dc->desc = "topology socket";
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const TypeInfo socket_info = {
>> + .name = TYPE_S390_TOPOLOGY_SOCKET,
>> + .parent = TYPE_DEVICE,
>> + .instance_size = sizeof(S390TopologySocket),
>> + .class_init = socket_class_init,
>> + .interfaces = (InterfaceInfo[]) {
>> + { TYPE_HOTPLUG_HANDLER },
>> + { }
>> + }
>> +};
>> +
>> +static char *book_bus_get_dev_path(DeviceState *dev)
>> +{
>> + return g_strdup_printf("00");
>
> If you just want to duplicate a static string, please g_strdup() instead.
OK, thanks.
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void book_bus_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
>> +{
>> + BusClass *k = BUS_CLASS(oc);
>> +
>> + k->get_dev_path = book_bus_get_dev_path;
>> + k->max_dev = S390_MAX_BOOKS;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const TypeInfo book_bus_info = {
>> + .name = TYPE_S390_TOPOLOGY_BOOK_BUS,
>> + .parent = TYPE_BUS,
>> + .instance_size = 0,
>> + .class_init = book_bus_class_init,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static void s390_book_device_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>> +{
>> + S390TopologyBook *book = S390_TOPOLOGY_BOOK(dev);
>> + BusState *bus;
>> +
>> + bus = qbus_new(TYPE_S390_TOPOLOGY_BOOK_BUS, dev,
>> + TYPE_S390_TOPOLOGY_BOOK_BUS);
>> + qbus_set_hotplug_handler(bus, OBJECT(dev));
>> + book->bus = bus;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void book_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
>> +{
>> + DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(oc);
>> + HotplugHandlerClass *hc = HOTPLUG_HANDLER_CLASS(oc);
>> +
>> + hc->unplug = qdev_simple_device_unplug_cb;
>> + set_bit(DEVICE_CATEGORY_BRIDGE, dc->categories);
>> + dc->realize = s390_book_device_realize;
>> + dc->desc = "topology book";
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const TypeInfo book_info = {
>> + .name = TYPE_S390_TOPOLOGY_BOOK,
>> + .parent = TYPE_SYS_BUS_DEVICE,
>> + .instance_size = sizeof(S390TopologyBook),
>> + .class_init = book_class_init,
>> + .interfaces = (InterfaceInfo[]) {
>> + { TYPE_HOTPLUG_HANDLER },
>> + { }
>> + }
>> +};
>> +
>> +static void topology_register(void)
>> +{
>> + type_register_static(&cpu_cores_info);
>> + type_register_static(&socket_bus_info);
>> + type_register_static(&socket_info);
>> + type_register_static(&book_bus_info);
>> + type_register_static(&book_info);
>> +}
>> +
>> +type_init(topology_register);
>> diff --git a/hw/s390x/meson.build b/hw/s390x/meson.build
>> index 28484256ec..74678861cf 100644
>> --- a/hw/s390x/meson.build
>> +++ b/hw/s390x/meson.build
>> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ s390x_ss = ss.source_set()
>> s390x_ss.add(files(
>> 'ap-bridge.c',
>> 'ap-device.c',
>> + 'cpu-topology.c',
>> 'ccw-device.c',
>> 'css-bridge.c',
>> 'css.c',
>> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
>> index 90480e7cf9..179846e3a3 100644
>> --- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
>> +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
>> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
>> #include "sysemu/sysemu.h"
>> #include "hw/s390x/pv.h"
>> #include "migration/blocker.h"
>> +#include "hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h"
>> static Error *pv_mig_blocker;
>> @@ -88,6 +89,7 @@ static void s390_init_cpus(MachineState *machine)
>> /* initialize possible_cpus */
>> mc->possible_cpu_arch_ids(machine);
>> + s390_topology_setup(machine);
>> for (i = 0; i < machine->smp.cpus; i++) {
>> s390x_new_cpu(machine->cpu_type, i, &error_fatal);
>> }
>> @@ -305,6 +307,8 @@ static void s390_cpu_plug(HotplugHandler
>> *hotplug_dev,
>> g_assert(!ms->possible_cpus->cpus[cpu->env.core_id].cpu);
>> ms->possible_cpus->cpus[cpu->env.core_id].cpu = OBJECT(dev);
>> + s390_topology_new_cpu(cpu->env.core_id);
>
> Why not pass the "ms" MachineState value to s390_topology_new_cpu()
> here, so you don't have to look it up there again?
Yes, will do.
>
>> if (dev->hotplugged) {
>> raise_irq_cpu_hotplug();
>> }
>> diff --git a/include/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h
>> b/include/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000000..e6e013a8b8
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/include/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
>> +/*
>> + * CPU Topology
>> + *
>> + * Copyright 2021 IBM Corp.
>
> 2022 now?
We are not getting younger....
>
>> + *
>> + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or
>> (at
>> + * your option) any later version. See the COPYING file in the top-level
>> + * directory.
>> + */
>> +#ifndef HW_S390X_CPU_TOPOLOGY_H
>> +#define HW_S390X_CPU_TOPOLOGY_H
>> +
>> +#include "hw/qdev-core.h"
>> +#include "qom/object.h"
>> +
>> +#define S390_TOPOLOGY_CPU_TYPE 0x03
>> +
>> +#define S390_TOPOLOGY_POLARITY_H 0x00
>> +#define S390_TOPOLOGY_POLARITY_VL 0x01
>> +#define S390_TOPOLOGY_POLARITY_VM 0x02
>> +#define S390_TOPOLOGY_POLARITY_VH 0x03
>> +
>> +#define TYPE_S390_TOPOLOGY_CORES "topology cores"
>> + /*
>> + * Each CPU inside a socket will be represented by a bit in a 64bit
>> + * unsigned long. Set on plug and clear on unplug of a CPU.
>> + * All CPU inside a mask share the same dedicated, polarity and
>> + * cputype values.
>> + * The origin is the offset of the first CPU in a mask.
>> + */
>> +struct S390TopologyCores {
>> + DeviceState parent_obj;
>> + uint8_t id;
>> + bool dedicated;
>> + uint8_t polarity;
>> + uint8_t cputype;
>
> What's the benefit of using uint8_ts here? Why not simply an "int"?
none, int is OK
>
>> + uint16_t origin;
>> + uint64_t mask;
>> + int cnt;
>> +};
>> +typedef struct S390TopologyCores S390TopologyCores;
>> +OBJECT_DECLARE_SIMPLE_TYPE(S390TopologyCores, S390_TOPOLOGY_CORES)
>> +
>> +#define TYPE_S390_TOPOLOGY_SOCKET "topology socket"
>> +#define TYPE_S390_TOPOLOGY_SOCKET_BUS "socket-bus"
>> +struct S390TopologySocket {
>> + DeviceState parent_obj;
>> + BusState *bus;
>> + uint8_t socket_id;
>
> Again, why uint8_t ?
OK
>
>> + int cnt;
>> +};
>> +typedef struct S390TopologySocket S390TopologySocket;
>> +OBJECT_DECLARE_SIMPLE_TYPE(S390TopologySocket, S390_TOPOLOGY_SOCKET)
>> +#define S390_MAX_SOCKETS 4
>> +
>> +#define TYPE_S390_TOPOLOGY_BOOK "topology book"
>> +#define TYPE_S390_TOPOLOGY_BOOK_BUS "book-bus"
>> +struct S390TopologyBook {
>> + SysBusDevice parent_obj;
>> + BusState *bus;
>> + uint8_t book_id;
>
> dito
yes, right
>
>> + int cnt;
>> +};
>> +typedef struct S390TopologyBook S390TopologyBook;
>> +OBJECT_DECLARE_SIMPLE_TYPE(S390TopologyBook, S390_TOPOLOGY_BOOK)
>> +#define S390_MAX_BOOKS 1
>> +
>> +S390TopologyBook *s390_init_topology(void);
>> +
>> +S390TopologyBook *s390_get_topology(void);
>> +void s390_topology_setup(MachineState *ms);
>> +void s390_topology_new_cpu(int core_id);
>> +
>> +#endif
>
> Thomas
>
Thanks Thomas for the review,
Regards,
Pierre
--
Pierre Morel
IBM Lab Boeblingen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-19 15:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-20 11:57 [PATCH v7 00/13] s390x: CPU Topology Pierre Morel
2022-04-20 11:57 ` [PATCH v7 01/13] Update linux headers Pierre Morel
2022-04-20 11:57 ` [PATCH v7 02/13] vfio: tolerate migration protocol v1 uapi renames Pierre Morel
2022-04-20 11:57 ` [PATCH v7 03/13] s390x: topology: CPU topology objects and structures Pierre Morel
2022-05-19 10:45 ` Thomas Huth
2022-05-19 15:22 ` Pierre Morel [this message]
2022-04-20 11:57 ` [PATCH v7 04/13] s390x: topology: implementating Store Topology System Information Pierre Morel
2022-05-24 10:59 ` Thomas Huth
2022-05-25 8:16 ` Pierre Morel
2022-05-24 11:08 ` Thomas Huth
2022-05-25 8:18 ` Pierre Morel
2022-04-20 11:57 ` [PATCH v7 05/13] s390x: topology: Adding books to CPU topology Pierre Morel
2022-04-20 11:57 ` [PATCH v7 06/13] s390x: topology: Adding books to STSI Pierre Morel
2022-05-24 11:07 ` Thomas Huth
2022-05-25 8:17 ` Pierre Morel
2022-04-20 11:57 ` [PATCH v7 07/13] s390x: topology: Adding drawers to CPU topology Pierre Morel
2022-04-20 11:57 ` [PATCH v7 08/13] s390x: topology: Adding drawers to STSI Pierre Morel
2022-05-24 11:10 ` Thomas Huth
2022-05-25 8:19 ` Pierre Morel
2022-04-20 11:57 ` [PATCH v7 09/13] s390x: topology: implementing numa for the s390x topology Pierre Morel
2022-04-20 11:57 ` [PATCH v7 10/13] s390x: kvm: topology: interception of PTF instruction Pierre Morel
2022-05-24 11:27 ` Thomas Huth
2022-05-25 8:22 ` Pierre Morel
2022-04-20 11:57 ` [PATCH v7 11/13] s390x: topology: resetting the Topology-Change-Report Pierre Morel
2022-04-20 11:57 ` [PATCH v7 12/13] s390x: CPU topology: CPU topology migration Pierre Morel
2022-05-24 11:32 ` Thomas Huth
2022-05-25 8:23 ` Pierre Morel
2022-04-20 11:57 ` [PATCH v7 13/13] s390x: topology: activating CPU topology Pierre Morel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ebbd2e46-3abb-2920-fa6c-f1b74fc1c203@linux.ibm.com \
--to=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).